User talk:Qwertyqazqaz1

Regarding edits to Gil Student
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
 * Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
 * The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblogspot\.com' (link(s): http://hirhurim.blogspot.com/2005_10_01_archive.html http://hirhurim.blogspot.com/2007_05_01_archive.html).
 * Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites.	 For more information about me, see my FAQ page.	 Thanks! SquelchBot (talk) 15:37, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Avi (talk) 15:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Avi, I was mistakenly reverted by a BOT. (I did happen to use the talk page.) It isn't a revert war. Please advise.

Thanks for your help!Qwertyqazqaz1 (talk) 15:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * However, others have indicated that your edits may not be in accordance with Policies and guidelines by using non-reliable sources such as blogs and original synthesis in some of your edits. -- Avi (talk) 15:59, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Avi, that was a BOT making a mistake. In fact the very same source I used is authored (indisputably) by the subject of this article. AND the article already has MANY references to this very same blogspot blog. Thanks again. Qwertyqazqaz1 (talk) 16:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * And just another note, this is a new edit; it has no issues regarding original synthesis, just a mistaken auto revert to the blogspot address. Qwertyqazqaz1 (talk) 16:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd have to look into it a bit more to opine as to whether or not I feel it was WP:OR. As for the 3RR, yes, I see it is a bot, but wiki policy, in general, is that if there exists significant contention about certain points, it is best to hammer them out on the talk page first instead of having people "toe the line" of 3RR. If it is obvious a revert/edit war is taking place, measures can be taken even if neither party actually violates the letter of the law; which I hope will not happen by anyone here. Have you tried setting out your arguments on the talk page and engaging others in dialogue there? -- Avi (talk) 16:14, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Avi, the bot just automatically reverted it due to the blogspot address in the reference. But the article has many references to the very same address. Qwertyqazqaz1 (talk) 16:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

I commented on the article talk page specifically vis-a-vis the use of attendance at a Conservative institution as the source for a Conservative belief. -- Avi (talk) 16:22, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The information has been added by Lobojobo. -- Avi (talk) 16:59, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Signing your comments
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:48, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:BobGrant.gif
Hi did you take this pic?Genisock2 (talk) 19:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Fonda-arrested.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Fonda-arrested.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 07:05, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, please see the disclaimer at template:mugshot and the discussion at template talk:mugshot. This image may be protected under copyright despite being a matter of public record. Thanks, ˉˉanetode╦╩ 07:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * okay, done! thanks Qwertyqazqaz1 (talk) 17:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Fonda-arrested.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fonda-arrested.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Thirdship (talk) 00:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:BobGrant.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:BobGrant.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Genisock2 (talk) 13:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay. I've added it. Thanks Qwertyqazqaz1 (talk) 20:54, 17 February 2008 (UTC)


 * and that is you yes?Genisock2 (talk) 20:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Can you confirm that you took this photo?Genisock2 (talk) 12:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Fonda-arrested.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Fonda-arrested.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Done. Qwertyqazqaz1 (talk) 15:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fonda-arrested.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Fonda-arrested.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. ./zro (⠠⠵) 11:31, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:RabbiYehudaLevin.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:RabbiYehudaLevin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:RabbiYehudaLevin.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:RabbiYehudaLevin.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 02:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

File:BobGrant.gif listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BobGrant.gif, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Karppinen (talk) 16:55, 28 December 2010 (UTC)