User talk:Qx2020

September 2012
Hello, I'm Calu2000. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Disjunctive graph, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Calu2000 (talk) 17:41, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Open Shop Scheduling problems
Hello Qx2020,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Open Shop Scheduling problems for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Danrok (talk) 09:52, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Online-optimization"
Dear David.moreno72,

Can you please specify the exact reason for deletion of the useful information on "Online-optimization" ?

Kindly appreciate the significant time we spent for finding, creating, providing this useful information "Online-optimization". Rather than deleting this, kindly consider expanding it or shifting/ integrating this information with other articles.

Thanks Amit 01:49, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Online-optimization, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, you requested deletion.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. David.moreno72 (talk) 10:59, 23 March 2016 (UTC),

September 2017
Hello, I'm Muhandes. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 07:53, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Scott's formula moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Scott's formula, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 22:32, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Scott's formula


Hello, Qx2020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Scott's formula".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:59, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of National Freight Index in India for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Freight Index in India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/National Freight Index in India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Jen yir e2  06:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)