User talk:Qxthy

January 2021
Hello, I'm Tartan357. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2020–21 United States Senate special election in Georgia without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ― Tartan357  Talk 05:03, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I edited that article in order to make it more aesthetically pleasing. Qxthy (talk) 05:06, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , thank you for responding and welcome to Wikipedia. To be perfectly honest, that's one of the most ridiculous reasons I've ever heard for removing verifiable content. You removed two candidates and their results from an election infobox, which seriously harmed the article. Wikipedia does not exist to please you aesthetically. ― Tartan357  Talk 05:12, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2020–21 United States Senate special election in Georgia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ― Tartan357  Talk 05:13, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * I removed them because they didn’t make it to the runoff. If you look at other elections involving runoffs, you’ll see that only the top 2 finishers are mentioned at the top. If people read the entire article, they’ll see the other failed candidates. Qxthy (talk) 05:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , there is a WP:CONSENSUS to include all candidates earning at least 5% of the vote in election infoboxes. Wikipedia relies on discussion-based consensus-building. If you are reverted, you must engage in discussion instead of edit warring. ― Tartan357  Talk 05:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Well then you better go edit the article about the 2018 Mississippi special election to include the guy who got 16% of the vote. Qxthy (talk) 05:20, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at 2020–21 United States Senate special election in Georgia, you may be blocked from editing. ― Tartan357  Talk 05:20, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * You should also check out the 2014 Louisiana senate election and include the guy who got 13% of the vote. Qxthy (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You also need to edit the 2016 Louisiana senate election to include 3 more people Qxthy (talk) 05:27, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is WP:NOTMANDATORY, and I have no interest in editing those articles at this time. You are certainly free to do so if you wish. ― Tartan357  Talk 05:28, 10 January 2021 (UTC)