User talk:Qzd/Archive 3

Question
Just wondering, why did you revert my edit on your talk page? I was just giving you information about warning templates and I was not vandalizing or attacking you. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 22:01, 21 April 2022 (UTC)


 * You may want to see Don't template the regulars. I obviously know about the templates and choose not to use them on vandals most of the time, at least with SWViewer. Manually templating based on the severity is fine. Qzd (talk) 22:06, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Albanian Gangs
Hey,whats the reason to delate my edits? 2A02:908:D93:7680:5940:482A:5A8E:D14D (talk) 06:07, 27 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The article is titled "Albanian mafia" and you're going through and find-replacing every instance of "mafia" with "gangs". Doesn't really make sense; probably something you should discuss on the article talk page first. Qzd (talk) 06:17, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Albanian gangs
I had in plan,your delating was not right. 2A02:908:D93:7680:5940:482A:5A8E:D14D (talk) 06:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Ahir clans
On the page Ahir clans the user is doing disruptive edits please have a look. He is the adding sources with no relation to Ahir clans. We have a spearate page for Ahir caste This should not be mixed with the same. The user editing history shows how disruptuve he is and he is also continuously removing all the warnings from his talk page! Please have a look before editing Baidy540 (talk) 08:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Why is there a separate article? Perhaps it should redirect to Ahir? Qzd (talk) 08:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

, there is continuous new accounts being created on the Ahir clans page by possible sock ( suspected sock master not identified as yet), the only aim is fake glorification on the page. The content added by me is well sourced and referenced and is appropriate on the page to make reader understand about this sanskritisation process through which communities made new claims in just last 120 yrs.RS6784 (talk) 08:44, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

There are no sock accounts. All the user is doing to glorify a particular community and his most of the edits are related to same topic. His other edits are only to divert administration Baidy540 (talk) 08:54, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

your account is just 1 hr old, I don't need to say anything more here. Please stop making false accusations. RS6784 (talk) 09:07, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Its my choice whenever i make account, please be polite and if your account is 8 months old it will not justify your disruptive edits Baidy540 (talk) 09:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

An apology and a thank you for your assistance
Hi Qzd. I just wanted to thank you for your help and apologize for accidentally reverting your counter-vandalism activity on the Josh Duggar and sending a warning to you. The user was using so many different names and reverting and posting so quickly that I got confused and accidentally reverted and warned you in the process. Thanks again for you help! Wikipedialuva (talk) 04:44, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

A message from Seriousnes
Seriousnes (talk) 12:17, 17 May 2022 (UTC) Hi,this is Seriousnes. Thanks for the warning and helping me.I am new in this whole thing.Could you please help me if you can. I would appreciate that.


 * I would suggest not deleting references without a valid reason, since the wiki relies on those for verifiability. Mass deletion of internal links is also not appropriate, although pruning might be; see MOS:OVERLINK. Qzd (talk) 16:09, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

LP
I am adding a source now!! Why are you guys still removing it? Let&#39;s unite malta as one (talk) 01:03, 1 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Obviously not WP:NPOV. Qzd (talk) 01:09, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

That one IP
Don't worry, I also reported him for personal attacks. Dinosaur TrexXX33 (chat?) 19:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Unexplained removal
Why did you remove the entire 2022 monkeypox outbreak in the United Kingdom to replace it with a redirect? (I was still working on it, btw) Chaotic Enby (talk) 19:16, 2 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Mistake; only saw the deletion here. Qzd (talk) 19:20, 2 June 2022 (UTC)


 * No worries! Chaotic Enby (talk) 21:54, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Breezy (album)
why did you delete what i added on Breezy (album)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tinder ginger (talk • contribs) 18:55, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Reverted but at first glance seems like an inappropriate POV substitution of sources given the context in the article. Qzd (talk) 19:12, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Malvika Iyer
Hello! I noticed you had undid certain changes on the page “Malvika Iyer”. Thank you for that!

There have been several attempts to vandalize the subject’s (Malvika) page by Wikipedia user Raghuleeds without verifiable sources. More than 300-400 articles are published on the subject and the Wikipedia article is written using them.

The user Raghuleeds has made only 6 edits till date and they are all on the page of Malvika Iyer for the sole purpose of creating confusion? I’m not sure.

Can you please help in any way? Appreciate your support. Disabilityawareness (talk) 12:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Osiris


What's up with this? You have reverted the article to a form that violates the section you yourself referenced: Use either the BC–AD or the BCE–CE notation consistently within the same article. The mix of BCE and AD, as present in your preferred version, is one of the things prohibited by this section. 175.39.61.121 (talk) 21:11, 16 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry for not being clear. I think the BCE notation was already established by frequency of use given the topic; AD is used only a few times. Those instances should be changed to CE. Qzd (talk) 21:22, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

A message from Keithbarnold2
If you read the article in its entirety you will see that the definition of a massacre is not met. The core objective to accurately represent history and facts to best degree possible. All the official sources refer it as a riot. Only sources that are trying inflame or create ideological bias are mis-using the term Massacre. Please explain why you think this tragic event was a massacre before you just revert my edits again. Thank you. Keithbarnold2 (talk) 03:05, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Gor Minasyan Nationality change upcoming Asian Championships
Gor Minasyan switched countries and is currently representing Bahrain and competing in a couple of weeks in the Asian Championships since he is on the start list and upcoming commercial promos. PricePRICE (talk) 21:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC)


 * https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1127243/europe-south-america-bahrain
 * https://www.panarmenian.net/eng/news/301486/Armenian_weightlifter_Gor_Minasyan_to_represent_Bahrain PricePRICE (talk) 21:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Please WP:CITE those in the article. Qzd (talk) 22:05, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

A message from SmsTechIT
SmsTechIT (talk) 01:49, 19 October 2022 (UTC) Hey, Im a teacher At southmoreland of 27 Years and i keep getting my edits deleted and i know what im talking about, this needs to stop.


 * You may know what you're talking about when you edit the Southmoreland page, but the problem is that you don't know how Wikipedia works. -- Cosmic (talk) 01:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

XXXXVIII
why have you changed the name back? the correct roman spelling for 48 is XLVIII FinnX2 (talk) 21:09, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Doesn't matter what the 'correct' numbering is; we use the notation sources use i.e. Wehrmacht and historians. Qzd (talk) 21:16, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

edit warring
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Tdshe /her 19:46, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Tdshe /her 20:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

A message from 160.72.167.84
Hello!After my resaerch, I do think that including his money would give a sense of pride, and it is fact-checked!

160.72.167.84 (talk) 18:24, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi
i did read everything, but the whole article is complete bullshit, it’s literally fake history, only putting biased sources, that’s why I requested it’s removal FF0010 (talk) 18:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * You need to use the templates to request removal, per those instructions. It's not really obvious why the sources are unreliable, so you would need to explain more. PROD is for obvious cases. Qzd (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Clayton Samuel White's page
Hi Qzd,

I have been helping my friend Meredith White edit her father's Wikipedia page, which contains many errors and incomplete information. Please make sure that the edits I've made are reinstated, as it took us a few hours to do this, and we were in the process of adding the references (and editing the bio box) when you stepped in and reverted the entire thing to the original. I would be happy to be more specific about each and every edit, but that could take a very long time. Please advise. All best, Katie  ~  KatieHafner (talk) 01:00, 14 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Please consider WP:CONFLICT policy, which discourages writing about family members. Your edits are still in page history and can be restored by anyone. However, without any sources they will likely be reverted. If you want to basically rewrite the article from scratch and add reliable sources later, create a WP:DRAFT of the article instead and edit that to a place where it can be substituted into the main article (with citations to reliable sources). Also please don't post personal info here like phone numbers. Qzd (talk) 02:06, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

ghost
Hello??? please respond to me about your fake pulling of my facts 2600:1004:B17D:4F10:B1C5:B664:5665:6E7B (talk) 05:42, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

A message from Wolfquack
Hello Qzd Recently I noticed that you reverted my edit here, if that not is considered adhering to the WP:NPOV, then why is this is? I’m not a “intelligent-designist” but this ID “documentary” article doesn’t seem so NPOV either in content perhaps? It seems like a double standard.

Wolfquack (talk) 19:03, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The other article has numerous citations and an explanatory note for that descriptor, plus years of talk page consensus; your edit has none of that. Qzd (talk) 20:29, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the reply, I take the reproof. I’m very new to Wikipedia and I don’t edit here often. I’m familiar with some of the rules but not most of them. If you could perhaps send me some WP pages on the rules that be of gratitude from my side. Wolfquack (talk) 01:19, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:NPOV, WP:ABIAS, WP:FRINGE; Wikipedia has a pro-academic bias and relies on mainstream sources so on topics of science and medicine in particular, you'll find direct language like "pseudoscience" or (rarely) "propaganda", if supported by many reliable sources. It should be even more rare for political documentaries, where sources differ widely. Qzd (talk) 03:58, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok thank you (: Wolfquack (talk) 20:38, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

What do you do on Igdir article?
What do you do on Igdir article? OÇ KYRGYZ (talk) 23:04, 23 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I've reverted the other changes but prefixing "so-called" could be seen as WP:POV commentary, especially in conjunction with something labelled as genocide. Qzd (talk) 23:16, 23 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Oh okay I am sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by OÇ KYRGYZ (talk • contribs) 03:40, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It’s ok I also did the same mistake too on, which Qzd (thankfully) reminded me. You can read the discussion above of which he linked some pretty good WP articles. As quoted above:
 * “@Wolfquack: WP:NPOV, WP:ABIAS, WP:FRINGE; Wikipedia has a pro-academic bias and relies on mainstream sources so on topics of science and medicine in particular, you'll find direct language like "pseudoscience" or (rarely) "propaganda", if supported by many reliable sources. It should be even more rare for political documentaries, where sources differ widely.”
 * Hope that helps you out (Wolfquack (talk) 02:57, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * ^ Well this was sure a waste of time wasn’t it? Wolfquack (talk) 17:42, 27 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, Qzd,
 * I reverted edits by this sockpuppet on Iğdır. Could you check the current state of the article and ensure it is not politicized and biased? Many thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 02:43, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Liz this is a shame for sure, I thought this user(s) had some real potential in Wikipedia. Sad Wolfquack (talk) 17:44, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Liz I’m not the OP of this talk page but I just checked the article and nothing appears to be out of the ordinary, everything on the surface is reliably sourced (although I must admit I’m not incredibly familiar with this articles or the referred city). Wolfquack (talk) 17:51, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Maybe add a archive index?
@Qzd Perhaps include an archive index because it almost got me in trouble for a past reproof we had, which the editor did not know of. I noticed you have several unlisted archives so maybe put them up so people can see & look through them instead of “sweeping” the sections. Wolfquack (talk) 16:07, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

A message from 104.35.104.215
104.35.104.215 (talk) 20:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC) I'm getting angry guys. IM YOUNG SCRAP I AM THEE ARTIST. I CAN PROVIDE MY ID AND OTHER INFORMATION I'VE ASKED FOR YOU GUYS TO CHANGE THIS 27 TIMES IVE CHANGED IT MYSELF AND IVE EVEN PAID YOU GUYS TO MAKE THE CHANGE. ALL OF THESE BIRTHDAY WEBSITES ARE GOING OFF OF WHAT YOU GUYS ARE STATING ONLINE I WAS BORN 1994 NOT 1989 1980 LI9KE YOU GUYS KEEP CHANGING IT TOO. IVE NEVER ONCE TOLD ANYBODY I WAS 30 A NYTHING AND NOW PEOPLE ARE WISHING ME A HAPPY 35TH AND 40TH BIRTHDAY BECAUSE OF YALL. I COULDN'T BE MORE ANNOYED. IM YOUNG SCRAP. MY NEW ARTIST NAME IS SKRIZZY. BUT EVERYBODY KNOWS ME BY THIS NAME. HAVING THIS SIMPLE MISTAKE FOLLOWING ME IS CRAZY. PLEASE FIX ASAP AND STOP CHANGING IT BACK. I AM THE SOURCE. DO NOT TOUCH MY AGE AGAIN


 * Best to just delete the birth date if there isn't a source. "I'm the source" is not really valid here; it has to be in a published source anyone can verify. Qzd (talk) 21:24, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

A message from 195.191.163.27
195.191.163.27 (talk) 16:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Hi Below are two sources for the changes I made. https://dynamo.kiev.ua/pl/news/536903-metalist-1925-moe-dzi-ogosi-powoanie-viktora-skrypnyka-na-stanowisko-gwnego-trenera https://fakty.com.ua/ua/sport/20231220-metalist-1925-zminyv-trenera-harkivyan-ocholyv-vidomyj-ukrayinskyj-fahivecz/ https://www.ua-football.com/ua/ukrainian/high/1703079577-oficiyno-viktor-skripnik-noviy-trener-metalista-1925.html

A message from Theoryisn'tfactuntilproven
You are absolutely incorrect. My corrections were unbiased and neutral and more accurate than AIPAC's (pro-Israel lobby) recommended euphemism "Israel/Palestinian Conflict" - to hide the FACT (from the American public) that Palestinians have been living under Israel's illegal occupation since 1967 (after Israel took land by force in 1948, forcing the removal of Palestinians who were living on that land at the time). Most Wikipedia pages related to Palestine misinform US readers by ignoring factual history to represent the State of Israel in the best light.

Most Wikipedia biographies list professional titles and experience first. For Noura Erakat, you diminish her professional credentials by listing "activist" first, as if that is what Wikipedia wants readers to remember most about this person.

I've tried to correct other Wikipedia pages when I come across similar misrepresentations of historical fact and biography. The last time, I was accused of "vandalism" by one of you "contributors?" "editors" - you who obviously decide which facts you want to present, which facts you want to ignore and which facts you want to misrepresent with obfuscating language. Before that experience, I naively trusted that Wikipedia was correct because corrections were universally allowed. Now I know that isn't true.

So....you people who actively hide the facts about the origins of the State of Israel, the illegal occupation and the horrifying situation of the Palestinian population - you are complicit in the genocide taking place at this moment. Lie to yourself and readers. But decades from now, when all Palestinians have been killed or forced off the land that the State of Israel has claimed since 1948 (all of it), your children will wonder why you allowed that genocide - why you helped to hide the truth from American readers. Hurrah for you.

Theoryisn&#39;tfactuntilproven (talk) 22:28, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

Regarding your recent revert on Madhyadesha
Hey @Qzd, I want you to crosscheck the sources and information i added on article Madhyadesha. Can you tell me exactly what non constructive edit i made? Information i added is backed by authentic sources. Brahaspatya (talk) 00:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Weird maybe a misclick, apologies. Qzd (talk) 00:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
 * No problem. :) Brahaspatya (talk) 01:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

A message from 96.238.46.108
Here's the context: https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZPRTgFuBt/

No reason to take down a tongue-in-cheek joke that does not lie or defame someone

96.238.46.108 (talk) 19:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)