User talk:Rémy Ryan Robert

Nomination of The Space Between (2017 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Space Between (2017 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Space Between (2017 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 20:26, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of The Order (2017 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Order (2017 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Order (2017 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 01:54, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Death Beach (2016 film)


The article Death Beach (2016 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Film appears to fail WP:NFILM as it does not appear to have received any coverage in independent, reliable sources. The sourcing on the page appears to be only routine database listings, which cannot establish notability and some of which are in places that cannot even serve as a WP:PRIMARY or WP:TRIVIAL source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  07:39, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Death Beach (2016 film) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death Beach (2016 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Death Beach (2016 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BOVINEBOY 2008 14:26, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Fighting belle for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fighting belle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fighting belle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Madrenergictalk 10:30, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Braxtons to Towanda Braxton (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:06, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

November 2019
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:21, 3 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Not sure why you still haven't used these regularly, but please implement them as much as possible in the future, especially for any major changes. They help give others a better idea of what your intentions are when editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 12:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mariah Carey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mariah_Carey check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mariah_Carey?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Summer hit, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 17:17, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Summer hit
Could you please stop vandalizing the "Summer hit" article? Whether from this account, or as an anonymous IP. I'm tired of reverting your edits. And I think and  are too. If you persist, you will be blocked. --Moscow Connection (talk)
 * Agree! Alecsdaniel (talk) 23:38, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Summer hit
You have been playing with the article "Summer hit" for months or even years, but now it has to stop. --Moscow Connection (talk) 09:43, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Summer hit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt the article "Summer hit". --Moscow Connection (talk) 20:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Moscow Connection (talk) 20:20, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for gross incompetence and persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 20:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC) • ("Since 1999, "Mi Chico Latino" by Geri Halliwell is of the best summer hit in several countries.") The IP is the same. Could you do something, please? --Moscow Connection (talk) 20:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * He continues to edit unlogged, there was yet another attempt to add the same photo today: . (His IP appears to be static, it hasn't changed since 2018.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 17:23, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * He is back:

April 2021
. Hi! Could you please block for a longer period, for a year or even two or three? The person is back at his usual business, see "Summer hit". --Moscow Connection (talk) 16:00, 21 April 2021 (UTC)