User talk:Róbert Gida

If you want leave here a message for me!

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. ~ DC (Talk&#124;Edits) 02:03, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Noting some issues
Several editors have commented that this account appears to be a WP:SOCK, based on similarity with some other disruptive accounts editing at Talk:Barack Obama. If you have previouly edited under a different account name, please acknowledge, and stop if that account is currently blocked or banned from editing. If not, please be aware that you are taking the wrong approach as a new single purpose account that seems to exist solely for rapid-fire proposals to add to the Obama article negative events from the world at large with an attribution that they are Obama's fault. I am removing this pointless accusation from the talk page. Do not use the Obama talk page to launch accusations against other editors. If you continue, at some point one of us will ask for administrative nintervention and this account will be blocked from further editing the encyclopedia. - Wikidemon (talk) 19:00, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Who is the mentioned several editors????? Please don't lie! Róbert Gida (talk) 19:18, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * "If you continue, at some point one of us will ask for administrative nintervention " And this sentence is also a clear personal attack. Róbert Gida (talk) 19:21, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Please name another user who claimed sockpuppet case! Róbert Gida (talk) 22:45, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

It's a clear typo. Beyond that, I won't play that game. The subject is your editing, not me. Please stop adding stuff like this to the talk page. The talk page is not for posting your random pot-shots at the president, it is for discussing viable proposals to improve the article. Have you edited under any of these accounts? // removed - Wikidemon (talk) 05:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * No, but this is again a simple personal attack. Please keep the wikipedia rules. Róbert Gida (talk) 08:50, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for As a probable sockpuppet, contentious SPA, who certainly responds poorly to reasoned inquiries.. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Jclemens (talk) 19:39, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Non-admin comment Because he, like you, have only edited the Talk:Barack Obama page, with a few other edits on other users talk page. As well, both of your edits to that page have questioned the quality of the article, about it not including some "important" details. Based on this evidence, there is no doubt in my mind that you are Multiplyperfect.--Iner22 (talk) 16:23, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I think you may have missed the second half of my response, in which I said that, even if you aren't the same user, you merit blocking just for the edits from this account. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:27, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh I am so glad this guy has been permanently blocked. Good riddance to a sock-troll with a disgraceful agenda/attitude. No doubt he will be back.--Misortie (talk) 17:09, 28 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Is that word a variation of chump Jéské?--Misortie (talk) 22:05, 28 December 2009 (UTC)