User talk:Róisín Ruadh

Welcome!
Hello, Róisín Ruadh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Red Tory Party (UK), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Joseph2302 (talk) 00:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Red Tory Party (UK)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Red Tory Party (UK) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:02, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm Nonsenseferret. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Graeme Morrice, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. nonsense ferret  17:11, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Just to add some further explanation. Wikipedia is not the right place to try and raise awareness of things you've seen on social media. Facts added to biographies of living people must be backed up by independent reliable sources such as national newspapers - ignoring these rules often leads to users being blocked. Additionally, you must not continue to attempt to add content that has been reverted without discussing it first - this in itself might also lead to a block. --nonsense ferret  17:15, 16 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Hello Nonsenseferret thank you for making me aware of this, as you maybe able to tell I am new to wikipedia. I have made a better reference to a more reputable source Róisín Ruadh (talk) 13:45, 18 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I have reverted to your change because 1) it was not discussed at the article talkpage as is required, and 2) it is not independently sourced. Think national newspaper for independent reliable source, as coverage in newspapers is one way to judge whether an item is significant enough to be included. Biographies of living people are not for campaigning or scoring political points, the point of a biography is to summarise what people in reliable sources such as national newspapers, well known books etc. And again I would warn you that continuing to make this disputed change without discussing it at the talkpage of the article first is likely to lead to you being blocked. See the rules about this at Edit_warring. --nonsense ferret  14:06, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Red Tory Party (UK)


A tag has been placed on Red Tory Party (UK) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. AFreshStart (talk) 22:11, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

"Red Tory Party (UK)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Red Tory Party (UK) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 6 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. AFreshStart (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2022 (UTC)