User talk:RüHeRi

August 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 19:08, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Tell me the reason why you name ufology as a whole 'pseudoscientific'. RüHeRi (talk) 19:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The status as a field section of Ufology explains it. Notfrompedro (talk) 20:13, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Issues with the UFOlogy article
Hi there, - I was just trying to understand your issues with the UFology page? I thought it better to discuss it here rather than spamming a talk page section. Deathlibrarian (talk) 12:41, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

"spamming a talk page section" this sound really arrogant RüHeRi (talk) 13:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hey, I was talking about *everyone* spamming the talk page, not just you. Sorry if if that came across as arrogant. Its ok for you to show dissent for about content in wikipedia (its good to have people's opinions on the content) but there are general rules to follow. So if you have problems with the content, its best to discuss the content, and not attack the people so much. There are rules for how things are done. So for instance, if you believe the article says UFOLOGY is a pseudoscience, and that's not true, you need to link to an article (which is a reliable source) that says that. If there are enough articles, then the article would be changed. But we need to see articles that support your comments. In any case, I'm happy to give you a hand if you need it, if you need a hand, just ask on my talk page Deathlibrarian (talk) 23:14, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Dear Deathlibrarian, Thank you, this is really friendly of your part. Me too, I want to apologize, you are right. Sorry! - Obviously the subitem "Protoscience" in the main-article on Ufology is missing. And you are right: There is a need for a reliable source. So I will eventually start searching for it - or even better write an essay to be published in one of these peer-reviewed magazins (e.g. by reference on Kuhn, Mack, Vallée, Jung, Pauli). There's still a lot to do to get things right. Best regards, Rüdiger RüHeRi (talk) 02:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * No problems there Rüdiger, Wikipedia can be frustrating at times, and there's a lot of rules that are not obvious to new people coming in... its unfortunately quite complicated, but I guess considering it's open source content, that anyone can edit, there needs to be rules to keep the quality of the content up. Ultimately, we all just want to make it better and improve content. It's an area I'm very interested in, so let me know if you are going to put something in if you like, I'd be happy to assist. Deathlibrarian (talk) 07:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

No Personal Attacks
Hello, I'm JoJo Anthrax. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Pentagon UFO videos that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Comments like the ignorance of some narrow-minded mods (here), YOU are Wikipedia. How ridicule is this (here), and this sound really arrogant (here) are assumptions of bad faith that, if they continue, are likely to result in you being topic-banned or blocked. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 15:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

This is wikipedia works today. You are nothing but a clique of ignorant dogmatics (sic!). RüHeRi (talk) 15:47, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm going to go out on a limb here and observe that responding to a personal attack template with a personal attack might not be the best strategy. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 17:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

You're really a smart guy 👍😁✅ RüHeRi (talk) 17:47, 25 August 2021 (UTC)