User talk:R.Arden

Gerard Depardieu
You don't change your nationality like that. Trust me, i'm in the field. Moreover, you should think about your historical method. There are relevant sources and irrelevant sources. And in this case, you should start with this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons. Good day to you.

R.Arden- I changed his name back to the correct version and you deleted that as non-constructive? You should be taken off Wikipedia. Very irresponsible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.218.74.34 (talk) 15:42, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

"[Kremlin is] an official diplomatic source, with recognized good-faith"… OK, let's play your game: do you have any source to justify this claim? I mean: seriously. You see, sources are one thing. Thinking is another. (87.67.143.211 (talk))

And may I insist: international law is not as easy as reading a website paper. Until France did not take off Depardieu's nationality, you just CAN'T tell anything for now. Point.

Zherar Depardyo
не французский и не русский, а он монгольский, новый актёр — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.69.245.199 (talk) 15:17, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Это что, шутка с большим новым Александр Pistoletov в видеоролик о математических классов? -R.Arden (talk) 15:24, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Это Мордор!--62.69.245.199 (talk) 15:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Putin macht Gérard Depardieu zum Russen
Bitte mal ganz ruhig abwarten (!) was und ob Depardieu selbst dazu sagt.. Eine Enzyklopädie ist doch kein Newsticker. Siehe z.B. auch http://www.spiegel.de/kultur/gesellschaft/filmstar-gerard-depardieu-von-putin-zum-russen-ernannt-a-875537.html :
 * "Die Formulierung des Kreml, wonach Depardieu einen Antrag auf Einbürgerung gestellt hatte, wurde von einem Assistenten des Schauspielers dementiert. Der Neu-Russe selbst meldete sich bisher nicht zu Wort." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.138.126.65 (talk) 15:40, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Note
Also, when doing vandal revision the last template you put on the IP vandalizing Gérard Depardieu Wasn't needed. Good Day! §haun  9∞76   ༆  15:46, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, R.Arden. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! §haun  9∞76   ༆  15:47, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Civility warning January 2013
Please note that this edit is unacceptable. First, what you were reverting was not vandalism]. This is not vandalism, this is content issue, and you are the edit-warring party. Second, the issue is being discussed at the talk page, and has not yet reached consensus. Please stop edit-warring and stop issuing incivil comments, otherwise you will be reported to administrators. Thank you for understanding.--[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter (talk) 16:58, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Since you now accused me of vandalism and incivility, I opened this ANI thread. Hereby the notification.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:13, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Due to your repeated actions at Gérard Depardieu I have filed an addendum to the initial report due to your crusading, bloody-minded and wholly wrong interpretation of policy. You'll find it in the same thread at ANI, hence this notification.  Captain Screebo Parley! 18:34, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 21:55, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


 * You'll notice the other editor involved was blocked for the same period of time, and just had his unblock declined...are you honestly expecting to be unblocked considering that? (✉→BWilkins←✎) 23:02, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't expect to be unblocked. However, i expect to be judged by my actions, not by Captain Screebo's actions and for that to occur, we should not be blocked by the same period of time.
 * Although i do wish to be unblocked, i recognize i indeed took a "battleground behaviour". What i disagree on, is the other charges, as i justified above, and for that i ask for a reduction of the time blocked, not a full pardon.
 * Also, i would like to point out that there is a basic difference betwhen my appeal and Screebo's appeal, and that is, that during my appeal not only i detailed the situation entirely and presented a reasonable defense, but i also acted most civilfully in it, while i realize that was not the case in Screebo's defense.
 * What i would like to point out, is that the mistake i did was an exception, and that not only i recognize it but i am also redeeming myself from it. What i can offer in my position is that. The assurance that said behaviour will not repeat itself. And i base that on my previous and impecable past in other languages wikipedia.
 * I understand if you still refuses my plea anyway, but if so, i would like you to tell me in what my appeal is wrong (such as you did to Screebo), and not how long or what is wrong with that other user's appeal.
 * With that, i again apologise for taking your time and for the situation caused by my stances, and await your reply.
 * -R.Arden (talk) 23:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * first, you should not have amended you unblock in the manner you did after it had been commented upon. Second, you're making a bad accusation that I did not judge you based on your own actions: It's insulting to suggest that, and is obviously not the case based on the very different reasons for your blocks.  Considering your block should have been for longer than his, I could make it longer now if you wish. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 23:30, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * What is the propper way to ammend an unblock request?
 * And i did not acused you of judging me by his actions. I asked you to show me my mistakes as you did to him, as so far i haven't seem you pointing out the flaws in my appeal.
 * That is pretty much it. If you believe my block should have been longer than his, then i can only feel disappointed. I do not want that happen, but i strongly believe that at least i tried to act in good faith, despite my battleground behaviour, while the other used just took random insults at me when confronted with references displeasing him. And that in my opinion would render a smaller punishment, not a larger one.
 * But, one can be wrong more than once, and perhaps this is the second time i am wrong in wikipedia today... -R.Arden (talk) 23:42, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry to hear that you was blocked for the same time as other guy. (V4711) -- Victor  • talk   02:35, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * It is okay. Like i said earlier in a discussion, i rather live, BE BOLD and get blocked when my editions or my existance annoys someone than just be a meek editor with a lot of personal lobbying with other editors. That however does not makes me feel less dissapointed by the unfair blocking (unfair in the sense that i should never obtain more or the same ammount of blocked time as a person who clearly lacks any civility to edit wikipedia or partake in a civilized debate), specially given the whole context where i got dragged into the fight. -R.Arden (talk) 03:14, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, it's unfair. Hope you'll be back to Wiki soon. --  Victor  • talk   20:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the kind words, and i hope to be back soon! After my block ends, give me a call for any help or assistance you may need :) -R.Arden (talk) 23:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * OK. In which country are you? -- Victor  • talk   00:58, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taedonggang Brewing Company, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Draught (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 10 January 2013 (UTC)