User talk:RA0808/Archives2012/June

RE: Turkish Angora
Why do you accuse me of vandalism, when someone else is using the "undo" function as I am? In fact that poster is violating Wikipedia policy. His posts are NOT original work, they are controversial without noting same (he is disputing the result of a team of geneticists) and he is not presenting neutral information. He is posting as fact a fundamentally flawed interpretation - which is scientifically verifiable. So why is he not blocked and accused of vandalism? Why is he permitted to promote his blog and personal agenda, and accuse others of fraud? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnkaraTUA (talk • contribs) 22:06, 31 May 2012 (UTC)


 * You both are in violation of the Three Revert Rule. Please stop your edit warring now or you will be reported. RA  talkcontribs 22:20, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Turkish Angora - Wikipedia/Vandalism
Hello RA0808,

A member of non profit Angora cat association, Turkey, which tries to protect Turkish Angora cats and also does excessive research about anything related to Turkish cats. I am a volunteer and gain nothing by sharing my conclusions on Wikipedia.

It was said I engaged in an edit war, I am sorry for that. Unfortunately one user Ankara TUA repeatedly removes my contribution to Wikipedia page Turkish Angora. I hope I am not wrong to call it as vandalism. This person accuses me of lying and promoting personal agenda, however I have to say I have done a serious research on this subject, have all needed information showing inconsistencies and misinterpretations of genetics of Turkish Angora cat. Some users including AnkaraTUA are aware that evidence presented by me can be harmful for them, because I guess these persons are breeders of Turkish Angora cats and I am claiming that these are not real Angora cats (not related genetically to Angora cats in Turkey). Unfortunately this is not out of my head, but a result of research and critical thinking.I am aware many Angora cat breeders abroad will be unsatisfied with my editions. All I do I rely on science and try to point out what is wrong about it.

Please take a look at evidence I represented and decide yourself, is this logical or not. I am preparing an article about this genetic study and I am going to analyze everything, every DNA sample, conclusions etc.

I am planning to improve Turkish Angora Wikipedia article even further, as I have some interesting information from broader perspective, using as many sources as possible.

I would like to ask you a temporary page protection if its possible.

Please correct me if I am wrong about something.

Thank you very much.

Kind Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankarakediler (talk • contribs) 22:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC)


 * You both are in violation of the Three Revert Rule. Please stop your edit warring now or you will be blocked. RA  talkcontribs 22:20, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello!
Would you like the edits by the IP to your userpage to be removed?--5 albert square (talk) 22:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Lol, I just noticed you were offline so I've just removed it as it was prettttyyyy nasty x--5 albert square (talk) 22:55, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * No, I'm actually online and just forgot to update the status. Thank you for reverting! RA  talkcontribs 23:06, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Would you like your pages protected?--5 albert square (talk) 23:07, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * No thank you. I don't see the need to protect my userpages, since I personally don't give much notice to the semi-literate insults IP vandals leave. Just click, revert, and add to my counter. Thank you for offering, though! RA  talkcontribs 23:10, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * No probs, let me know if you change your mind :)--5 albert square (talk) 23:16, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: Joseph Marello Institute
Greetings, RA0808, I see that you tagged the above referenced new article as needing additional citations but I see no references at all. Is there something I am missing? If I was there first, I would have tagged this as completely unreferenced. Please let me know if this is just a difference in editing styles or a policy I have missed. - UnbelievableError (talk) 04:33, 6 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Now that I look at it again it seems like I've mistagged it. I've changed the tag to . Thanks for pointing it out!  RA  talkcontribs 16:58, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Paul Holmes edit
I wanted to add  something  positive to a  mostly  negative  article

marty — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martymuke (talk • contribs) 09:48, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: Mike Callton
I am concerned that the Mike Callton page is being continually vandalized with respect to a section called "Vagina," which does not accurately reflect any facts in the issues about the context to which the comments were made, which is also potential libel. Also, there are opinions continually inserted into sections that are directly insulting to the person that the article is about. I would request the article be restored to its original form from before the frenzy of edits, which would be about last week, and locked temporarily to avoid defamation and biased political attacks.

-NickWake99


 * There isn't enough vandalism from multiple IPs or users for me to ask an Administrator to protect the page, I would suggest continue to revert the vandalism. If the specific IP persists in adding those sections you can give them a WP:3RR warning. RA  talkcontribs 19:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: Chika ike
Hello. I noticed that you prod'ed the above article. Why not CSD: A7?keystoneridin! (talk) 23:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I think you may be mistaken, I've never seen that article before now. You must have me confused with another user. RA  talkcontribs 02:04, 23 June 2012 (UTC)