User talk:RAGHU670

Ways to improve Ka and Ki
Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. RAGHU670, thanks for creating Ka and Ki!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. ,

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 20:55, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 4 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 11:39, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Sultan (2016 film) page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=674556369 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F674556369%7CSultan (2016 film)%5D%5D Ask for help])

Proposed deletion of Namaste England


The article Namaste England has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No content other than an infobox, no indication of notability (does not fall into CSD)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Westroopnerd (talk) 23:13, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Ka and Ki


Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Ka and Ki. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Ki and Ka. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Ki and Ka – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. NextGenSam619t@lk 11:16, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Singh Is Bliing.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Singh Is Bliing.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Singh Is Bling.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Singh Is Bling.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Dangal first look.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dangal first look.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:00, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:KKPK first look poster.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KKPK first look poster.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Shandaar First Look.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shandaar First Look.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Welcome- Back- Cover.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Welcome- Back- Cover.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:01, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

"Theatrical Release Poster" and SuperHit
Hi, please note that "Theatrical Release Poster" should not be capitalized. It should be "Theatrical release poster". I've seen you do this a few times including here, here and here. It's not a huge deal, but it does create more work for other editors, so it would be appreciated if you'd keep an eye on this. Also, please do not add statements like "The film was declared 'SUPERHIT' by the box office." into articles. This is promotional fluff that has no business in an encyclopedia. "SUPERHIT" has no encyclopedic meaning, it's someone's opinion. Content should be written from a neutral point of view. Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:21, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dangal first look.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Dangal first look.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:PRDP first look poster.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:PRDP first look poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jon Kolbert (talk) 08:51, 5 March 2017 (UTC)