User talk:RAJATPASARI

hey
Hey dude write something here.This can be used for communication between wikipedia users.So go ahead enjoy editing.!!Vaibhavchandak (talk) 16:45, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

hi rajat
when do we have to strt editing the page related to our topic? i have edited some of the topics related to india.will it be fine as per the deadline of 31 aug? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pankaj marghade (talk • contribs) 12:46, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

thanks rajat,for the information.Pankaj marghade (talk) 13:32, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Congrats
Great going Rajat on your Wikipedia editing. Keep making contribution to your as well as other pages also.

Happy editing ..!!!!

Anurag acj (talk) 07:48, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

ansuman (talk) 07:23, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Multiple inheritance
You asked me to remove the Copyvio notice on Multiple inheritance. After looking at the article I do not think I can do that as I still have serious doubts as to the sourcing for most of the article, and the fact that there are barely any citations. The article in that state falls far short of the standards required by wikipedia. I suggest following the steps at CP. It may be possible to move some text - whose source is known - from outside the div tag. Other possibilities are to fully rewrite the article with sufficient sourcing. I have also left a note at Wikipedia talk:India Education Program requesting whether anyone would like to take this matter off my hands. -84user (talk) 12:06, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Rajat. According to the information we have been given, all students at COEP have been firmly requested to stop any further editing on Wikipedia per 2011-11-03. Please have a look here: Wikipedia_talk:India_Education_Program, Wikimedia_Foundation_-_India_Programs/Education_Program, Wikipedia Signpost/2011-11-07/Special report and Wikipedia_talk:India_Education_Program. Can you please explain - from your own perspective - what exactly has been communicated to you personally and your course-mates? What is the position of your instructor on this?
 * On a related note, according to your course page at India_Education_Program/Courses/Fall_2011/Data_Structures_and_Algorithms the final deadline for your assignment has been 2011-10-25T18:00. Is this information not correct? Can you explain this as well, please. Thank you. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 16:27, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Rajat, it's me again. I see that you have been online and complained about removal of contents on the multiple inheritance article. I cannot answer that question, but if there really was no further copyvio (I don't know, since I haven't newly revised the article), it might possibly be a collateral damage, since unfortunately most of the contributions of your course-mates have been copyvios and the top-priority for the community is to remove whatever "seriously smells like a copyvio" as soon as possible in order to avoid legal action of the owner of the copyrights against the publisher as well as the person who uploaded the copyrighted material, and thereby put the whole free content WP project at risk. We have been told that your course has finished working on the articles and even if not, that you all (except for the Macroeconomics course) have been told to immediately stop any further editing on WP for a while until the cleanup efforts have been finished. IMHO, it is okay if you discuss things on talk pages, but from what we have been told, even this would be disallowed, so take care, as I don't want to bring you in trouble. But since you continue to edit on other talk pages anyway, I once again would like to get feedback on your personal perspective on this. What exactly have you been told by IEP organizers on 2011-11-03 (or other dates)? What has been the deadline given to you? Your course page clearly states it was 2011-10-25, so assuming that the course page reflects the most up to date info (as it should), there should be no need whatsoever for you to edit WP right now. What exactly is your instructor's position on this? Please communicate and help us helping you. Thank you. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 19:48, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

copied from User talk:Salix alba, move here to keep discussion in one place-RAJATPASARI (talk) 06:44, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Ok. So you had problem with my image. Fine. But what about the content ? As I already said there was just problem with the definition. So what was the need of removing the entire contents? RAJATPASARI (talk) 08:18, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Your contributions seem to be: in the lead The class inheritance lets you generate a model that is closer to the real-world. The class inheritance lets you derive new classes (called derived classes) from old ones, with the derived class inheriting the properties, including the methods of the old class, known as base class. The most important advantage of inheritance is code reusability. Once a base class is written, it can be used anywhere and any how without having to redefine it or rewrite it. Already checked and previously written codes can be reused. Reusing existing code saves time, money, and efforts and the program becomes more efficient and reliable. Without redefining the old class, you can add new properties to the derived class and this makes Multiple Inheritance a very good structuring tool in C++. When a sub class inherits from multiple base classes, it is known as multiple inheritance. Fig. illustrates multiple inheritance. This is more to do with inheritance in general rather than multiple inheritance in particular. It is also flawed the aim of inheritance is not to be closer to the real world. Then there is a new Need for Multiple Inheritance section
 * Need for Multiple Inheritance

Inheritance is an important concept of object-oriented languages. There are several reasons why inheritance was introduced into object-oriented language. Some major reasons are : One of the reasons is the expression of inheritance relationship which sees that it closely resembles the real-world methods. Another important reason is the idea of reusability. The advantages of reusability are : faster processes, easier maintenance, and easy to extend. One can derive a new class (subclass or derived class) from an existing one and add new features to it. Suppose we have classes called College Students and Science Students and we need to add new class called Engineering Students. We derive the new class Engineering Students from the existing classes College Students and Science Students and then all we do is add the distinguishing features to Engineering Students that differentiates between college, science students and engineering students. This reduces the amount of typing and efforts considerably. One reason is transitive property of inheritance. That is, if a class X is derived from another class W, then all subclasses of X will automatically show the properties of class W. This property is called transitive nature of inheritance. Suppose we derive class X from existing class W. The classes Y and Z inherit from class X. Later on we find that class W has a discrepancy(bug) that must be fixed. After fixing the problem in W, it is automatically reflected across all classes that are derived(inherited) from W. This has indeed reduced the amount of efforts that one would have taken if each class derived from W was to be corrected separately. This makes transitiveness as one of the most important properties of Multiple Inheritance. Again this is mostly about Inheritance in general. The example seems flawed, surely Science Students would be derived from College Students. Engineering and Science would have more a sibling relationship rather the is-a or has-a relationship for inheritance. The current example of a cartoon cat better captures the essence of multiple inheritance. That was not in the article at the time of your edits. The material about transitive relations is off topic. Thats an important but separate issue. Finally you lacking any sources for your material see WP:V.


 * Overall your doing better than most IEP students. WIth an existing article its harder to get material included. The most helpful addition would be to find sources to backup some of the statements in the article.--Salix (talk): 09:47, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I can confirm your work was not a copyvio, there are other issues which mean its not suitable for inclusion in the page which you can see at User talk:Salix alba. You can use the diffs to show your contributions to your instructor and .--Salix (talk): 10:07, 10 November 2011 (UTC)