User talk:RAJIVVASUDEV/Archive 1

Your submission at Articles for creation: Performance fabrics has been accepted
 Performance fabrics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Mz7 (talk) 20:55, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Performance_fabrics help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

RAJIVVASUDEV, I spent a good amount of time trying to clean up the article and add sources. I also spent a decent amount of time debating with myself over whether to accept the submission or decline it. In the end, I decided the encyclopedia could be improved if I chose to accept, but I also decided to add a refimprove maintenance tag to the new article. Currently it has a lot of unsourced content, which is highly undesirable because as an encyclopedia our content should be verifiable. As a result, I strongly encourage you to continue to improve the article by adding sources—not general sources that just mention the subject, but sources which go in and actually verify or show to readers that the content you wrote in the article is true. I also wanted to let you know that I moved a bunch of sources you added to the article's talk page, because I wasn't sure where they belonged. If you need help, feel free to contact me on my talk page or ask a question at the Teahouse. Best of luck, Mz7 (talk) 21:00, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Performance fabrics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acrylic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Incorrectly changing your user name
User account "Rajiv Vasudev" is not registered. If you wish to use "Rajiv Vasudev" as your username, please make a request at Changing username. Otherwise this page will be deleted. - üser:Altenmann >t 05:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Question
What is your connection with ? I strongly suggest you stop playing around in each other's user space and focus on building an encyclopedia. --Neil N  talk to me 13:06, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Close-knit conductor.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Close-knit conductor.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
== Rajiv Sharma (talk) 11:00, 7 August 2018 (UTC)Sensors for fabricsRajiv Sharma (talk) 11:00, 7 August 2018 (UTC) ==

Rajiv Sharma (talk) 11:00, 7 August 2018 (UTC)Dear Sir, please check if this page will be useful for textiles( industry people). need advice to check initial page. regards Rajiv11:00, 7 August 2018 (UTC)Rajiv Sharma (talk)

Comment on Talk:Textile
Hi Rajiv Vasudev, I saw that you placed a comment at the top of talk:Textile. Did you perhaps mean for this comment to be placed at the bottom under the merge discussion? If so, please move it down so that everyone can see it. Currently it is in a section that was added over 10 years ago. Leschnei (talk) 13:00, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, RAJIVVASUDEV. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Leschnei (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Dyeing
Rajiv Vasudev, I can see that you are enthusiastic about editing Wikipedia which is terrific, however, I think that you need to pause and spend a little time learning about how to edit properly. Here are some specific steps for you to take. And please don't be discouraged, this is a learning curve that every editor goes through.
 * 1) Please read the links above to learn general editing.
 * 2) When you add a comment to any talk page, put it at the bottom of the page. If you keep putting comments at the top, no one will see them!
 * 3) Don't change things like hatnotes without learning about their use first. The inclusion of Dying in the hatnote for Dyeing is to help guide readers who have landed on the wrong page. And proper formatting is important so that you don't 'break' the hatnote.
 * 4) Wikilinks should go in brackets  not.
 * 5) English grammar is important, including proper punctuation and word use. Perhaps starting your edits in a word processor would be helpful.

I have reverted your edits to Dyeing and put some of your text back in with proper formatting. Please ask if you have further questions. Leschnei (talk) 13:36, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I think that the 'cleanup' tag refers to the entire article and not just the lead paragraphs. Leschnei (talk) 13:48, 8 August 2018 (UTC)


 * I moved 'Selection of dyes' under 'Methods'. I think that it fits in better there. Leschnei (talk) 14:02, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Innovations in textiles (August 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * User:RAJIVVASUDEV/Innovations in textiles may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:RAJIVVASUDEV Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:RAJIVVASUDEV reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Declined submission of Innovations in Textiles
I appreciate the observations and declined decision but curious to know about the possibility of continuing for chasing the same or I should concentrate on something else. In my opinion it will be useful for Textile community and fashion industry to cope up with the latest innovations and wikipedia should not be behind by others for the sake of the information,it becomes more important for the wiki project of wiki fashion. Lots of innovations in textiles are happening and accessibility is not sufficient.Through wikipedia we can make the things more visible to large user base.

Kindly advise Regards rajivvasudev@outlook.com RAJIVVASUDEV Rajiv Sharma (talk) 12:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Performance fabrics
I'm a little bit worried that your latest addition (the table) is not supported by sources, and more importantly that the subject itself is unencyclopeadic.

What is the difference between a so-called "performance Fabric" and a fabric?

I don't want you to spend lots of time and effort on this, and then have me come along and remove your hard work as unsourced or unencyclopeadic. -Roxy, the dog. barcus 14:58, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * (moved from Roxy the dog's Talk page) Hi Roxy, appreciate your observations.i have added the required references to the chart, The basic difference between Fabric and Performance fabric is performance.which is enhanced in these fabrics. Don't hesitate to ask me again ThanksRajiv Sharma (talk) 17:44, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * So exactly what performance do you mean? ... and enhanced from what state? -Roxy, the dog. barcus 19:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * None of the sources of that table support your claim that those fabrics are "performance fabrics." Have you got any sources related to "performance fabrics"? -Roxy, the dog. barcus 19:36, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 14:21, 12 August 2018 (UTC) SuggestBot Hi there i appreciate your kind words and thankful to the wiki family who are sincerely doing hard and honest efforts for our next generations .I am always there for my contributions.Sincere thanks and regards to the Wikipedia family Rajiv Sharma

Disambiguation link notification for August 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Performance fabrics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sportswear ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Performance_fabrics check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Performance_fabrics?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Functional clothing Draft
From your first reference -

"Functional clothing in fact has never really been systematically defined or classified,"

Roxy, the dog. barcus 07:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Roxy, the dog. barcus Hi ! but you can help me to define, the name Functional clothing have wider spectrum which is limited in Performance fabrics .ThanksRajiv Sharma (talk) 04:31, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Functional clothing (August 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Functional clothing may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:RAJIVVASUDEV Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Waggie&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:RAJIVVASUDEV reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Waggie (talk) 16:44, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

The contents were removed immediately after the observations came in notice, kindly review and advise further.Thanks and regards. Rajiv Sharma (talk) 03:43, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ZDHC (August 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ZDHC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ZDHC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:ZDHC Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:ZDHC reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 11:42, 25 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Relevant refs.are added.ThanksRajiv Sharma (talk) 08:16, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: ZDHC (August 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ZDHC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ZDHC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:ZDHC Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:ZDHC reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:ZDHC
Draft:ZDHC, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:ZDHC and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Draft:ZDHC during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:08, 28 August 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 06:14, 29 August 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 09:57, 29 August 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 03:35, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Appeal.2 for review the block
There is nothing more I can do for you. You are welcome to share the information you emailed me here, but I have already reviewed and declined your unblock request. Please stop emailing me and please stop pinging admins. --Yamla (talk) 10:56, 1 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Removed pinging and required information is added in the request.Rajiv Sharma (talk) 05:11, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Dear Admins. Please help me out of this situation, if my request need any further clarification from my side. ThanksRajiv Sharma (talk) 03:36, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * You have an open unblock request, it will eventually be reviewed by an administrator. Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 08:19, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
 * 331dot ThanksRajiv Sharma (talk) 10:13, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Respected Admins, Please see if I deserve a 2nd chance .Kindly review my request. Thanks and regardsRajiv Sharma (talk) 07:41, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * This is a checkuser block, so only a checkuser can unblock you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:22, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Diannaa Appreciate your reply, I am waiting for the checkuser and a favourable action. ThanksRajiv Sharma (talk) 02:49, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I am sorry to bother you again and again, Please try to understand my situation ~ My only objective was to defend an article and in process a father is helped by his own son. ThanksRajiv Sharma (talk) 03:42, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Respected Admin, Kindly suggest should I keep on waiting or give up? ThanksRajiv Sharma (talk) 03:37, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Help
I made a mistake and admitted it. The circumstances and my pieces of evidence are worthy, please do not ignore them completely. My aim was constructive. Nominator provoked me, and I was inexperienced to deal with things. Moreover, I am not the only victim of the nominator. Don't be biased and please reconsider this case/ request as an exception. If possible guide me how I can contribute till this block ends. Thanks,Rajiv Sharma (talk) 03:23, 13 September 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 12:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 10:38, 31 May 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 12:32, 6 June 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 09:55, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Plsss unlock my account user radu9990. Ilegall ban, i don't have multiply network id, it's a mistake.
Plsss unlock my account user radu9990. Ilegall ban, i don't have multiply network id, it's a mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.26.163.100 (talk) 23:51, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Appeal for review the block
talk Dear Admin, Kindly reconsider my block. I shall not repeat my mistake and will contribute positively to the Wikipedia community. RegardsRAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 08:16, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

=Help=

=Help=

=Help=

=Help=

=Help=

=Help=


 * My personal view is that whatever you may have done almost two years ago, there is no reason not to give you another chance, so I am in favour of unblocking you. However, I am not a checkuser, and adminsitrators who are not checkusers are not allowed to undo checkuser blocks without consulting a checkuser. I would normally consult the checkuser who placed the block in the first place, but he is retired. Perhaps one or both of and, who have both modified your block at one time or another, would like to comment, or any other checkuser who is willing to help. JBW (talk) 21:14, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * No objection from a CU standpoint to unblocking. No opinion otherwise. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:48, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
 * In case you missed this, CU has no objection to unblocking from a technical standpoint. Do you still want to consider unblocking? only (talk) 10:56, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Please note
I shall be watching any edit you make in Textiles related areas of the project, as I believe that you lack competence in English language and textiles. WP:CIR applies to ability to understand and write in english too. You failed to answer any of my questions relating to "Performance Fabrics" before you were blocked, please do not return to those areas where we interacted, as I will not allow your lack of competence to affect this project. regards -Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 18:16, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Reply to grudgingly written welcome note by Roxy the inedible dog . wooF
Self-declared scholar, you made three mistakes in your three-line note" Sorry, I am disqualifying your mentorship.

''I shall be watching any edit you make in Textiles related areas of the project, as I believe that you lack competence in English language and textiles. WP:CIR applies to the ability to understand and write in English too. You failed to answer any of my questions relating to "Performance Fabrics" before you were blocked, please do not return to those areas where we interacted, as I will not allow your lack of competence to affect this project. Regards''

Better you stay polite. Any bullying will be reported. I am not here for any revenge. Let me do the productive work that is already declared. Thanks RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 12:07, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Finishing (textiles), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Synthetic. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Your recent editing history at Textile shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 08:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Finishing (textiles), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shrinkage.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
 * @DPL bot It is corrected  ThanksRAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 11:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Letting you know
I removed your post from the reference desk because you copied wholesale, including my signature and timestamps making it look as if I had posted. Please dont do that, thanks. -Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 17:22, 17 September 2020 (UTC)


 * @Roxy the inedible dog . Hey dog, do you think whatever you do [] is right and others are wrong? Do not dare to mess with me. And reply on the article talk page only, do not spread your shit here.RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 08:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The purpose of an article's talk page (accessible via the talk or discussion tab) is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or WikiProject. Stick to the content[].


 * Communicate: If in doubt, make the extra effort so that other people understand you. Being friendly is a great help. It is always a good idea to explain your views; it is less helpful for you to voice an opinion on something and not explain why you hold it. Explaining why you have a certain opinion helps to demonstrate its validity to others and reach consensus.
 * Stay on topic: Talk pages are for discussing the article, not for general conversation about the article's subject (much less other subjects). Keep discussions focused on how to improve the article. If you want to discuss the subject of an article, you can do so at Wikipedia: Reference desk instead. Comments that are plainly irrelevant are subject to archival or removal.
 * Stay objective: Talk pages are not a place for editors to argue their personal point of view about a controversial issue. They are a place to discuss how the points of view of reliable sources should be included in the article so that the end result is neutral. The best way to present a case is to find properly referenced material.
 * Deal with facts: The talk page is the ideal place for issues relating to verification, such as asking for help finding sources, discussing conflicts or inconsistencies among sources, and examining the reliability of references. Asking for a verifiable reference supporting a statement is often better than arguing against it.

Is that clear, You can find more here[] RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 10:44, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I understand it, but clearly, you do not. -Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 12:04, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * You understand deleting only and projecting them as vandalism, and you are proud of the same. You are not sparing the Reference desk in your pursuit. Why are you not discussing the article on its talk page?

I am still waiting for you on the article talk page. Understand that newcomers are also necessary and valuable to the community.

Thanks and regardsRAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 12:49, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Kasturi cotton for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kasturi cotton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kasturi cotton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 10:55, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok, lets discuss over there at the Articles for deletion/Kasturi cotton. ThanksRAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 12:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Cotton into Kasturi cotton. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:48, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the help and guiding me. I will correct it and follow the same. Best regards RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 12:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Diannaa, I hope the correction is acceptable. Thanks and regards RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 15:52, 9 October 2020 (UTC)