User talk:RALmath/sandbox

Peer Review for Rachel (from Shannon)
I think that you've done a great job with your article! It is relatively easy to follow and adds A LOT to the original. My biggest suggestion would be to link to more Wikipedia articles and/or describe some of the concepts more. For instance, I know that the original stub included a link to the medial triangle, but I think it would be useful to link to it when you first mention it in Construction, especially because it is a new section. Some other places I suggest you link: 1. Under 9 point circle and Euler line- link duals to the Duality (mathematics) article, and link Nine-point circle, circumcenter, and Euler lines to their proper articles. 2. Under Nagel points and lines, Nagel points are not properly linked to the article (not sure why, maybe because the original article is "Nagel Point" and not "Nagel points"?)

Overall, I think you did a great job! It would just be easier to follow if the articles were linked to Wikipedia articles that readers could click on if they did not know the concept. Smctefft (talk) 18:49, 13 December 2018 (UTC)Shannon