User talk:RAWwebsite

Welcome!
Hello, RAWwebsite, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Rediscovering Art by Women (RAW), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Lavalizard101 (talk) 13:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Rediscovering Art by Women (RAW)


A tag has been placed on Draft:Rediscovering Art by Women (RAW), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Lavalizard101 (talk) 13:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

 Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must: Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text  at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Deb (talk) 13:27, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.


 * Thank you - there are violations of WP:COI. My intentions was not to promote but to educate. In British Art History there are many artists (now deceased) who along with well known artists contributed to major artistic movements. This follows the current movement of re-writing art history to make the balance closer to 50/50 given that most artists that were written out of our historical narrative were women. Therefore my aim is to address this by completing texts with names of historical figures - namely women - who to the detriment of art history have been left out. In what is this promotion? These are not contemporary artists nor people I have any relation to, they are historical figures - I source my information from journals, books and websites. RAW (the website I was trying to promote) in an educational platform on which has recently been launched on Art UK (our national artistic database) who is shining the light on these historical figures mentioned above. I am happy to not launch that page but I don't see why I should be blocked all together as I am not in violation of anything anymore?
 * Thanks,
 * M RAWwebsite (talk) 13:43, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * first line I meant *There are no violations of WP:COI RAWwebsite (talk) 13:43, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sacha Llewellyn (October 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sacha Llewellyn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sacha_Llewellyn Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bonadea&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Sacha_Llewellyn reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 20:01, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sacha Llewellyn
Hello, RAWwebsite. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sacha Llewellyn, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sacha Llewellyn


Hello, RAWwebsite. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sacha Llewellyn".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)