User talk:RBauder/sandbox

William's Peer Review
Hey Reuel! I've chosen your article and your contributions to peer evaluate. Looking at the original article, it actually seems to have already some sort of structure, which is promising. It seems mainly it needs just some fleshing out. I think your idea about expanding on the Five Clocks and registers is going to be good for giving this article more substance. I think it will be interesting and beneficial to the article when you to give more information about what he argued for in the book, and what specifically he said about registers and style. I think you've got a really good start with your sources. Also I don't think your sources have to be accessible outside of the UTA Libraries server thing, so don't limit yourself to just "google-able" stuff. Your original article, though it is well structured, does not have many structures haha. You mentioned you wanted to add some contributions he's made to sociolinguistics, I think that would make a great new section for this article. I think you've got some great ideas for this article! -William P Kirton Willkirton (talk) 01:27, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Response to Peer Review
Thank you for your review William! We really appreciate it! Also thanks for the tip about using the UTA library sources. I think the UTA database would be a great place to find reliable sources. 64.189.1.61 (talk) 15:33, 5 April 2018 (UTC)