User talk:RCMadShane

Flugelbinder
Firstly, you don't insert content into redirects while leaving the redirect in the article. Secondly, Wikipedia is not for FAQs or movie quotes or dictionary definitions of words; it's an encyclopedia, and its content needs to be written in encyclopedic style. Thirdly, you haven't presented any reliably sourced evidence that the word is actually in real-world use; just because a word was used in a movie or TV show doesn't necessarily make it a legitimate article topic for an encyclopedia if you can't demonstrate that a large number of people are actually using it in the real world. And fourthly, I don't have a problem; I'm a Wikipedia administrator who's just doing my damn job. Bearcat (talk) 16:06, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

if thats the case then how come there is the word Flugelbinder in wiki in the first place!! i never created the origional page just updated it... as you can see i am no expert but i belive you are wrong in this case. ok so you dont need to leave the redirect why not aglet is the correct term?? secondly no its not an FAQ.. the page was neve set as an faq the word apears in the urban dictionary and other points in the internet.. i only addecd the rubbish bucause you did not believe me. finaly i was under the impresion that Wiki was the peoples encyclopedia who gives you the right the just delete articals where they have not breached any rules.. i sugest you reenstate the page and put a marker on it to alow people to complain if the believe it to be incorrect or wrong i do not belive you should be both judge and jury