User talk:RCT/archive on wheels

...

Delete:Unsalvagable leftwing soapbox article
Articles like this make the encyclopedia look bad--RCT 19:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Just curious, but why did you write on my discussion page? Were you calling my attention to your RfD page? Thanks. --Michaelk 09:27, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Help Spread the Word
We're cleaning the bias off of wikipedia, one article at a time, pass it on to your closest friends--RCT 04:45, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

People who might be interested in hearing about the Afd
Heh RCT. If you're interested in spreading the word about the Researchers Afd, take a look at Articles for deletion/Bush Crimes Commission (2nd nomination) -- it was a similarly blatant POV article -- the administrator deleted it, despite his obvious political misgivings, because of the number of people that voted to delete. All sorts of allegations and harassment from the keep crowd, much of it very angry, but the non-encyclopedic article is now gone, and Wikipedia is a better place. One very angry anon-user is now following me around and reverting my edits, so be prepared for some harassment. The keep crowd will try to intimidate you by alleging something they call "vote-stacking", but keep in mind that Wikipedia has no rule against notifying people about articles they would be interested in reviewing -- it's just the POV-pushers attempt to shut you down. I'm pleased that you have undertaken this quest, as Wikipedia needs to rid itself of soap-boxing and advocacy articling so that it can become a true encyclopedia. I will keep track of the vote, and try to help you where I can. Happy editing. Morton devonshire 17:48, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Delete:Unsalvagable leftwing soapbox article
Articles like this make the encyclopedia look bad--RCT 19:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Why is this any of my concern? Эйрон Кинни  (t) 22:50, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Reliable sources
Please keep your personal political biases out of Wikipedia policy discussions. -- ChrisO 23:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Your Recent Edits
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Gdo01 20:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's NPOV policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gdo01 20:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

How is this an attack: "rv where does it imply they believe in conspiracies, they just want more answers". Use templates properly and and also users have to be warned multiple times before they are reported to administators.Gdo01 20:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Bob Mcilvane
The template says this: This article may not conform to the neutral point of view policy. A Wikipedian has nominated this article to be checked for its neutrality. Discussion of this nomination can be found on the talk page.

You have put no discussion on the talk page.Gdo01 20:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Columbus Day
I don't know what you're trying to prove by moving the Columbus Day article back and fourth, this could be considered vandalism. If you want to experiment with page moving, make an article in your userspace and move it around your own area, or try the sandbox. Thanks. --Dual Freq 19:48, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * My problem is you dumped the entire edit history for the article and its talk page, subverted semi-protection and removed 50% of the article. Other than that, I guess there is no problem. --Dual Freq 19:58, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
 * This is completely unacceptable. Moving the page back and forth and practically destroying it to suit your own point of view is vandalism, and if you do this again you may be blocked. Grand  master  ka  20:21, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Conservative notice board
This is a new board for people interested in conservative issues, if you wish to join, just add yourself to --RCT 20:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)


 * A noticeboard with the same title was created back in June and was deleted as it was deemed that WP space should not be used for projects with a particular political orientation. I understand that your project is "for all Wikipedians interested in these issues, regardless of ideology", but there is the concern that such a project may be misused. In June it was decided that Politics notice board should be created instead, so please use that preexisting forum.  Thank you. Gamaliel 21:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)