User talk:RCraig09/Archive 3 (2021-2022)

Useful links, notes, templates, etc.
——— COLLAPSIBLE TEXT

——— BASIC PATENT CITE:

———COMPLETE PATENT CITE:

——— REFLIST for TALK PAGES

——— MULTIPLE IMAGE template


 * Template:Multiple image

——— PROGRESSIVE WARNINGS TO OTHERS RE VANDALISM:

———— article

Information icon Hello, I'm Example. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks.

———— article

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

———— article

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

———— article

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia.

———— article

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Administrator intervention against vandalism

——— WIKITABLE


 * {| class="wikitable"
 * ! style="background: green; color: white" | Strong support
 * ! style="background: #a2cca2; color: black" | Mild support
 * ! style="background: pink; color: black" | Mild oppose
 * ! style="background: red; color: white" | Strong oppose
 * | a || b || c || d
 * | e || f || g || h
 * |}
 * | e || f || g || h
 * |}
 * |}

——— SVG:
 * SVG colors at etetoolkit.org
 * Web colors
 * Wikimedia Commons / Help / SVG Fonts
 * SVG help
 * Commons Template:Created with Inkscape
 * Commons:SVG marker templates
 * Wikimedia Commons Help:Inkscape
 * meta Wikimedia SVG fonts lists all installed fonts on Wikimedia servers available to SVG rendering
 * TEST: wmf tools SVG test
 * CHECKER: Commons SVG Checker
 * SVG Workaround Bot
 * Graphics Lab/Resources/PDF conversion to SVG

����� Hallo! Howdy! Wotcha! G'day! Hello! Hola! Bonjour! こんにちは Привет! ☺

——— Wikimedia graphics & video:
 * Web colors
 * SVG colors at etetoolkit.org
 * Wikikimedia Commons Graphics Lab
 * en.Wikipedia Graphics Lab
 * Video-to-Commons video converter
 * Help:Creation and usage of media files ...  parameter for videos, etc.
 * Template:Color ...  Hello, world

——— Wikipedia graphics:
 * Extended_image_syntax
 * Manual_of_Style/Images
 * Template:Graph:Chart
 * Maps for Wikipedia
 * Template:Graph:Chart

——— MISC.
 * Editor's index to Wikipedia
 * Wikipedia abbreviations
 * Extended image syntax
 * Reliable sources/Perennial sources
 * WP:UNCHALLENGED at Arguments to avoid on discussion pages
 * List of web archives on Wikipedia and Help:Archiving a source — and Village pump (technical)/Archive 198 re WebCite failure
 * Help:Footnotes
 * Help:Table
 * Template:Citation
 * Template:Harvard citation
 * Template:Sfn
 * User Agent Breakdowns — Wikimedia Foundation
 * MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist — and — meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Spam_blacklist





———

———

———

Five pillars:
 * 1) Wikipedia is an encyclopedia
 * 2) Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view
 * 3) Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute
 * 4) Wikipedia's editors should treat each other with respect and civility
 * 5) Wikipedia has no firm rules

Excel .xlsx spreadsheets that automatically generate XML code for .SVG graphics

 * Transcluded:


 * Transcluded

Is there any way to get a licensed picture of actresses/ famous people?
I really wish that the pages had pictures of the women. Is there any way to get a licensed picture of them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KaitlynneLimberg (talk • contribs) 08:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You simply have to find images, from somewhere, that are either in the public domain or under a suitable Creative Commons license. There is no "one place" you can find such pictures. Sometimes flickr.com users publish pictures with an adequate CC license. Follow the copyright links at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Contents to learn more. To upload non-free-use images can be a violation of federal copyright law, which Wikipedia and Wikimedia of course want to avoid. — RCraig09 (talk) 18:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Help on Wikiproject Climate change project
Hi,

any chance you want to help out on increasing coverage and info on this ? Carbon sink upscaling additional info on carbon sink upscaling (missing info) --Genetics4good (talk) 16:36, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

All American
Hey, I noticed that you reverted my edit on All American (aircraft). There seems to be a conflict between different sources on whether the name is "Boyd" or "Engel." I'm inclined to believe this one because its source for the name is more than just a guess at bad handwriting. Additionally, this source addresses the misidentification of the co-pilot as "Boyd." LeBron4 (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I took the safe route, and reported both sides by saying the co-pilot's name is "disputed". I hope this is agreeable. — RCraig09 (talk) 18:32, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
 * P.S. A 2016 version of the Disciples of Flight reference doesn't have the disputes that are in the 2020 version that I archived in the citation. The source evolved over those four years and I'm not sure how that affects reliability in this field which doesn't have heavyweight newspapers doing the research. So, I think it's safest to keep both sides of the story in our Wikipedia article. I'm copying this discussion to Talk:All American (aircraft) — RCraig09 (talk) 18:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Climate Change Performance Index
Hey! I just made a request in Graphics Lab here Graphics_Lab/Map_workshop. Also wanted let you know since you have done a lot of climate change-related graphics as well, like the scientific consensus graph, in case you are interested Bogazicili (talk) 11:49, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

svg files
Hey, RCraig! I saw an edit summary from you go by that said something about using Excel files to create SVG files? Someone on Commons requested I convert (line-drawing graphics? can't remember) to SVG files and they might as well have asked me to glomack the korpel via nuddensterm digropics. I wonder if you could tell me where to go to start to figure out what they're asking me to do? —valereee (talk) 17:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello again! Long time no click. My reply and explanation are here, on your User Talk page at Commons. — RCraig09 (talk) 18:20, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I am definitely not going to try to figure that out lol... —valereee (talk) 18:58, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

1972 in Climate Change

 * The Limits to Growth was published in 1972, and the projections in it have become prescient. Could you start a 1972 article? I'll be happy to add to it :) Victor Grigas (talk) 02:22, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I could see that if there were a 1972 in climate change article, that book might be worthy of mention. However, that mention would mainly involve saying that the book was published in that year. I've seen the recent reviews of how prescient the book was, but I purposely didn't include such reviews in 2021 in climate change because the book's prescience is not specific to 2021; it's ongoing. Probably, the best place for the current favorable reviews is in The Limits to Growth article itself, of course citing reliable current references. — RCraig09 (talk) 03:03, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Fair use
"Fair use" of promotional materials like posters used to promote films and the actors appearing in films provided by motion picture studios and film distribution companies are normally not challenged for "fair use". They are provided for public use in order to promote the films and the actors. If you are looking for a one sentence addition on Wikemedia commons then you can add in whatever one sentence 'fair use' comment you feel is needed. I have added two different promotional images now which you have reverted. I think the promotional poster from her new film for Jodie Comer is already on Wikimedia commons and appears to be adequate until better images become available. Either one of the 2 promotional images for her I have presented on her page can be restored. ErnestKrause (talk) 16:10, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
 * On Wiki P edia, there must be a specific non-free-use rationale provided for each use of an image. Separately, Wiki M edia accepts images only if they are in the public domain or are properly licensed—which is very different from Wiki P edia. — RCraig09 (talk) 16:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Teşekkürler! They say "A picture is worth a thousand words". — RCraig09 (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Jodie Comer infobox image
Hi! I believe that I have finally finally found some images that are suitable to be used on Jodie Comer's article. I just wanted to run it by you first, since you have been keeping on top of making sure there aren't any copyright violations on the page. The images are screenshots from YouTube videos with a CC license, it all seems legitimate to me. If you have any qualms with the images or if I have missed something, please let me know because I want to be certain that everything is A-okay before actually adding them to the article. I have already uploaded the images to Commons, so if there are any problems I will delete them as soon as possible. Anyways here are the images: Thanks
 * 1) c:File:Jodie Comer during an interview, August 2021.png
 * 2) c:File:Jodie Comer during an interview, September 2021.png

SINGmeAsadSONG (talk) 06:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)


 * 1) Leganerd.com is mentioned or used as a source on Italian Wikipedia about 20 times, and seems to be a genuine—albeit extremely sparsely viewed—entertainment website that appears to make its own original interview videos.
 * 2) Cinestera is barely mentioned on Portuguese-language Wikipedia, but has 46.7 thousand YouTube subscribers and appears to generate its own original videos.
 * Both videos state "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)", which is not very specific and I don't know if it qualifies under Wikimedia Commons' CC licensing requirements. I'll investigate there, but things look hopeful for the very first time. — RCraig09 (talk) 14:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * It seems a bit suspicious, however, that the subject has the same blue background in both videos. — RCraig09 (talk) 14:45, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * SINGmeAsadSONG, I've submitted my question to Wikimedia Commons here, where you can follow any response and explanation. — RCraig09 (talk) 14:40, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I've received the following reply already:
 * Yes, YouTube's Creative Commons licensing is okay for Commons. According to, the specific license is CC BY 3.0. We even have a template for it: YouTube CC-BY. Make sure to also tag the upload with a license review template so the license can be verified. Derivatives of such videos, like screenshots, are also okay on Commons so long as they specify the original source and use the same license or a compatible one. clpo13(talk) 15:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Small request image
I'm slowly going over all aspects of climate change to make sure it's main page ready. One of the issues with the current article is that there is a bit of sandwiching of images. I was wondering if you could cut off the empty bit of image, which could start from -0.6C rather than -1C. I don't think it will solve the issue entirely, but it's a start and the image will be prettier as well :). FemkeMilene (talk) 08:28, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Will do. I hope you're feeling better. — RCraig09 (talk) 11:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks! should be back to normal in six weeks. Mostly doing low-brain editing in the mean time. FemkeMilene (talk) 11:46, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Version 7 of the Cherry Picking GIF is now uploaded. I changed the aspect ratio from 1200:900 to 1200:800 to reduce height, and reduced size to  in the CC article itself. (2020 datum is included in update.) I did not want to change the aspect ratio more, because I discovered that making the height too small makes it look like temperature change has not been as rapid as it has been. — RCraig09 (talk) 21:15, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Thank you very much, Pyrrho the Skeptic. Your choice of barnstar is excellent! — RCraig09 (talk) 21:19, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Help Climate Communication Article
Hi RCraig09, I'm a student working on the Climate Communication article, and I have recently added my edits to the main space. I was wondering if you could help me incorporate and organize the existing article into my edits because there is some overlap. I'm a little at a loss of how to do it myself because I'm new to Wikipedia editing. I see that have some experience and are pretty active on this article. Any advice you may have would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! Upuslay (talk) 00:41, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Upuslay

Merger discussion for Electricity generation
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Electricity generation&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays

 * ˙ʇƃuǝɹq ǝıƃɹǝuǝ ǝzolǝzuǝɹƃ uǝ pıǝɥpuozǝƃ ǝƃıpǝlloʌ ǝɾ 2202 ʇɐp dooɥ ʞı ¡ǝʞɯǝɟ ʇʞuɐpǝq ƃɹǝ lǝǝɥ — RCraig09 (talk) 21:16, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Effects of climate change on humans
Greetings!

I mentioned you at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Effects_of_climate_change_on_humans#Change_in_life_expectancy

Baxter329 (talk) 16:08, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Brazil. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Moxy - 22:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

An Inconvenient Truth (Reply)
Thanks for your feedback on my (large) edit to An Inconvenient Truth. I've written a fuller reply on my talk page (TL;DR point taken) but I wanted to follow up with you more proactively here.

I had a look as you suggested at 2020 in climate change, and it seems like an apt comparison because in both cases over half of the article markup is citations.

However what I need help with how to choose appropriate names for the ref's, as they're currently unnamed; is there any guidance on that or do I just use my own best judgement?

Martin Kealey (talk) 01:24, 20 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't know of any specific "rules" for naming references. I use the source followed by a "_" followed by a date. :For example:
 * If you have embedded spaces, you must use quotes:
 * This system almost always avoids conflicts between different citations, and gives useful information when it's invoked within the narrative text with the slash "/":
 * — RCraig09 (talk) 01:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If you use the cite template located in the drop-down box at the top of the edit box, it automatically puts in quotes " " for you. — RCraig09 (talk) 01:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * — RCraig09 (talk) 01:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If you use the cite template located in the drop-down box at the top of the edit box, it automatically puts in quotes " " for you. — RCraig09 (talk) 01:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If you use the cite template located in the drop-down box at the top of the edit box, it automatically puts in quotes " " for you. — RCraig09 (talk) 01:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

hello - Inclusion criteria re 2022 in climate change
Thanks for caring about climate, I do too. To keep the hounds at bay, we have to use WIKI WP:P&G but that means living by it ourselves. This frustates me at times, but list articles still need to comply with NPOV and WP:LISTCRIT  NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 02:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The section you cite, WP:LISTCRIT, recites "While notability is often a criterion for inclusion in overview lists of a broad subject, ,..." Please reconsider so we can avoid an edit war. I'm open to different wording, but using the term "significant" does not violate WP:NPOV as your edit comment claims. — RCraig09 (talk) 02:29, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * In view of the foregoing WP:LISTCRIT quote, do you seriously think Wikipedia should limit that article to items warranting separate articles?? Your 14 June revert technically violated WP:BRD, and I want to avoid an edit war but will change back within a day or two unless I hear from you. Again, I'd be very willing to consider serious suggestions for wording of inclusion criteria. — RCraig09 (talk) 21:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Ouch my eyes. Answered here []   Note I used History of climate change science as a hopefully good spot for central discussion. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 00:28, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Ouch my eyes. Answered here []   Note I used History of climate change science as a hopefully good spot for central discussion. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 00:28, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:20, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for making the world a better place. I hope all is well with you. — RCraig09 (talk) 22:25, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Overview effect
I get that you don't like the edit summaries from that IP, but quotes supported by Goodreads and Medium shouldn't be in any Wikipedia article. Drmies (talk) 15:35, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Your point re sourcing is well taken. My more complete response is at Talk:Overview effect. — RCraig09 (talk) 20:11, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Re Veracity of statements by Donald Trump
What a rubbish revert and statement, apart from the fact my spell-checker did not find any errors, which if there was, correct them, which is so minor in this context, it is the Title, not the contents that determine what the article should cover. Note, it does cover, in part, both prior e.g. the art of the deal and post, e.g. 2020 lies, maybe it needs expanding or change the title and "restrict it" to your narrow definition that does not correspond with the current title.The Original Filfi (talk) 08:02, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * My reply is posted at Talk:Veracity of statements by Donald Trump. — RCraig09 (talk) 15:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Overview effect/Bimm
A personal thank you for your work of raising the quality of my addition! A short apology for not citing more nuanced and mixing in some unrefed statements which spilled over from critical discussions of The Blue Marble. I wrote it a bit hurried. I love the elaboration of the source, I was wondering if you knew Bimm, since you elaborated the source so nicely? Nsae Comp (talk) 19:08, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No, I don't know Bimm. I just sat at my computer and read his paper and found it to be very thoughtful and rich in content. It took me several hours to digest and organize and write. I'm happy that you consider my edits to be an improvement. Thank you for sharing that material. — RCraig09 (talk) 19:14, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)