User talk:RDP67029

June 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to British Rail Class 43 (HST) has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Minkus (talk) 20:55, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

July 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --DAJF (talk) 09:45, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --DAJF (talk) 09:47, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

September 2009
Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Tad Lincoln (talk) 19:15, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. HLE (talk) 19:30, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Crewe Heritage Centre, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Crewe Heritage Centre was changed by RDP67029 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-10-24T16:13:23+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 16:13, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Crow nest junction 2010.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Crow nest junction 2010.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:06, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to British Rail Class 47 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 20:16, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to British Rail Class 47 constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 20:20, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to British Rail Class 390. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 20:21, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to British Rail Class 390. L Kensington (talk • contribs) 20:23, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:28, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

I had several years as a Guard, working 47-hauled goods & passenger trains, & never had one breakdown or burn. Please substantiate your claims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Archolman (talk • contribs) 02:55, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to British Rail Class 47 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 18:22, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 18:24, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Crow Nest Junction for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crow Nest Junction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Crow Nest Junction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:08, 21 September 2022 (UTC)