User talk:RDXL

Hi, I was the IP adding criticism to the Fairphone page. Please let me know what kind of quotes you need and I will give you links to posts in the the FP forum. Thanks. But the information there is pretty controlled and most of the info I got was through private messages.

Here is a modified version. Could you point out what is missing or goes against WPs rule of citing verifiable information? The problem of pointing out that a company is not giving out information as it promised to do as a project is difficult because they do not give out information in the first place. But I think it is valid criticism because their goals where different before.

https://www.fairphone.com/roadmap/social-entrepreneurship/

"Give consumers a better understanding of where their products come from and how they are made", "Engage directly with consumers to start discussions about fairness.", "Reveal every step of the process in making a phone, from materials and production to cost breakdowns."

Although promised to be different, Fairphone controls information and related to their products strongly.

Therefore deep discussions about future hardware, unsolved problems, their supply chain , working conditions there and how they get check, Fairphone's cooperation with Google, or the design of modules are not possible, beacuse Fairphone does not answer questions related to this issues. Thus making the promise of a movement that shares information with their customers about how phones are getting produced and to also incorporate their users' knowledge and ideas void. All that is left to the users in the forum is the discussion of DIY fixes for the existing hardware, aimless speculation and to explain to each other how to use Android.

hi have a cat
never used this thing

SpiderVice (talk) 13:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC) 

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)