User talk:REGENT123456

April 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Richard Keen, Baron Keen of Elie, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 06:44, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ... disco spinster  talk  16:32, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

REGENT, I agree with the edit itself, but your edit summary was false, and it seems pretty clear to me that you are not a neutral party here. Drmies (talk) 16:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello, I'm WikiDan61. I noticed that you recently removed content from Richard Keen, Baron Keen of Elie without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:10, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Richard Keen, Baron Keen of Elie, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Kpddg  (talk)  15:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, REGENT123456. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Richard Keen, Baron Keen of Elie, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Kpddg  (talk)  15:50, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia policy on editing using more than one account
Bearing in mind recent edits at Richard Keen, Baron Keen of Elie from an IP address, and by an editor called, I think it would be a good idea if you read Sockpuppetry, which is a Wikipedia policy. Sweet6970 (talk) 12:40, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Brattice (talk) 16:48, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/RUSTINGTON. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 10:50, 14 August 2022 (UTC)