User talk:REM Monster

Image tagging for Image:Cherry Ghost.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Cherry Ghost.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:06, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

CHERRY GHOST PAGE EDIT:

Hi there. Forgive me if this is incorrect but I believe you deleted the 'Trivia' section on the CG page and I was wondering why you did that? I spent a good deal of time researching CG interviews to create the section, provided article/interview links to support each fact and even checked certain details with Mr CG himself Simon. Stevexyg (talk) 23:21, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Can't Exist.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Can't Exist.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 12:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Red House Painters Retrospective.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Red House Painters Retrospective.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 10:07, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:The Invisible Parade & We Almost Made It.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:The Invisible Parade & We Almost Made It.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 05:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Virgin Megastores store locations
An article that you have been involved in editing, Virgin Megastores store locations, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. -- John (Daytona2 · talk) 13:51, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Mistress (song)
Another editor has added the  template to the article Mistress (song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 21:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

All You Need Is Nothing
You removed the refimprove tag on this article without adding any sources. I do not feel that a brief Billboard mention (and the artist's own press release) is sufficient sourcing. I have restored the tag. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Flag icons
Please don't add flag icons to the release dates for albums. The manual of style discourages the use of flag icons for this kind of date; they are purely decorative and add no information that the name of the country does not provide. Thanks, Gwernol 10:59, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Our Shadows Will Remain
Q: How many legs would a horse have if you called its tail a leg? A: Four. Changing what you call something doesn't change what it is.

Similarly, the trivia section in Our Shadows Will Remain is a trivia section, no matter what you might call it. Heck, it's a trivia section if you remove the section's name.

That the guy who mixed one of the tracks recorded an album four years ago with Arthur, the mixer's pen name and the album and song title constitute a piece of ephemeral trivia, distantly connected to the current topic. Yet you've made it a bullet point under "Singles", because you don't want it labeled trivia or removed.

Let's suppose we're writing about a legislative bill, sponsered by Rep. Smith, Sen. Jones votes for the bill. Rep. Smith clerked for Sen. Jones as a judge several years earlier. Would that fact merit mention in an article on the bill?

Maybe we're writing about Movie X, directed by Smith, written by Johnson, Anderson, Jones and Williams. Four years earlier, Anderson directed a movie that Smith had a role in. Do we put that in an article about Movie X?

All would be obscure, trivial references. Just like the one at issue here.

Mdsummermsw (talk) 15:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Infobox updates
Hi, I appreciate the updates/fixes you are doing to the infoboxes of various articles. However, could you please follow the guidelines for each of the particular infoboxes? For example, the earliest known release date known is the only one that should be entered for Infobox Album or Infobox Single. Also you should use a pipe link for the records labels to remove the word "Records" where necessary. Also you should be aware that the wikilinking of dates is now deprecated as per MOS:SYL. Thanks, --JD554 (talk) 08:59, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletions of several articles related to artist Magnet
Hello. I have proposed deletion for the following articles: Lay Lady Lay (Magnet cover), On Your Side Companion EP, Minus EP, Hold On (Magnet song), Last Day of Summer, The Day We Left Town EP, Chasing Dreams EP, Where Happiness Lives EP, Fall at Your Feet (Magnet_song), Lonely No More EP. None of the above had any assertion of notability. Especially with no reviews or third-party sources, I believe that simply listing these albums and songs on the artist page is sufficient, rather than them having their own articles. Feel free to contest the proposed deletions by removing them, as anyone can do so. Thanks, Raven1977 (talk) 22:51, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Flowers & Football Tops
Hi, I noticed you created the above article and stated it's to be the Glasvegas's next single. Do you have a citation for that? Without one the article is likely to get deleted per WP:NSONGS. Cheers, --JD554 (talk) 09:04, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Redirect
Please do not create malicious redirects. They are disruptive and are considered vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Cheers,Jamiebijania (talk) 08:51, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Eulogies (album)
A tag has been placed on Eulogies (album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cerejota (talk) 07:20, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Here Anonymous
A tag has been placed on Here Anonymous requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cerejota (talk) 07:21, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Here Anonymous
I have nominated Here Anonymous, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Here Anonymous. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cerejota (talk) 18:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Eulogies (album)
I have nominated Eulogies (album), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Eulogies (album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Cerejota (talk) 18:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Kraig and Joseph.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Kraig and Joseph.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 14:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Doves Last Broadcast.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Doves Last Broadcast.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Fred the Oyster (talk) 14:55, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Doves Lost Souls.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Doves Lost Souls.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Fred the Oyster (talk) 14:55, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Serena-Maneesh
Thanks for the cleanup and changes to the Serena-Maneesh pages, I really appreciate it. Cottser (talk) 13:02, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Doves Catch the Sun CD2.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Doves Catch the Sun CD2.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Sherool (talk) 12:29, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Doves Catch the Sun CD2.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Doves Catch the Sun CD2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 23:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:A Brief History of Love.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:A Brief History of Love.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 21:54, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Joseph Arthur
It's been almost a month since this article was reviewed. I'll allot one more week for changes before making a final decision.--Atlantictire (talk) 10:37, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 3 EP Collection


The article 3 EP Collection has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable album, fails WP:NALBUMS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Jay  Jay What did I do? 22:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of ITunes Festival: Live in London (EP) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ITunes Festival: Live in London (EP) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITunes Festival: Live in London (EP) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  → Lil- ℧niquԐ 1 - {  Talk  } -  01:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Image for article
You may wish to add http://www.amazon.com/Nights-LP-12-songs-Kozelek-Versions/dp/B004RP96KO Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:15, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Three More Days


The article Three More Days has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article does not meet standards.  Non-notable, non-single song released on one album.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LongLiveMusic (talk) 07:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The World Was a Mess But His Hair Was Perfect


The article The World Was a Mess But His Hair Was Perfect has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 07:45, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rootless Tree


The article Rootless Tree has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 13:37, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Future Foe Scenarios


The article Future Foe Scenarios has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 16:30, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pieter Nooten and Michael Brook &#34;Sleeps with the Fishes&#34;.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Pieter Nooten and Michael Brook &. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Brook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hybrid. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Odludek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you...
Thank you for your help with Not to Disappear. Great edits and fast updates!! // Psemmler (talk) 18:20, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Opus 40 (song)


The article Opus 40 (song) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 16:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Holes (Mercury Rev song)


The article Holes (Mercury Rev song) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 13:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Opus 40 (song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Opus 40 (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Opus 40 (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Richhoncho (talk) 12:47, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Truelove's Gutter
Hi;

Just a quick note to say that I've amended Truelove's Gutter. The Reference number 2 kept coming up with an error for the Eric Youle copyright text. So I have put the statement (in its entirety) into a QUOTE function in the citation which has cleared the error and stopped it appearing as red text.

Hope this is okay and that all is well with you. Good article by the way. The joy of all things (talk) 21:47, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Doves Places Between Deluxe.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Doves Places Between Deluxe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

help
Great job done on music Wikipedia... could you have a look on Phase_(band) and see if you agree to remove the flags (a user kept on malignantly adding them and removing them) and if you agree for the discography pages to be kept? we need experienced wikipedians to back the matter or not... All the best Asouko (talk) 14:29, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
For adding this info REM. I don't know if you've ever seen the film but I did waaay back in 1968. It is a tour de force of filmmaking so I find this news to be very exciting. Best regards. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 21:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lonely Astronaut Records


A tag has been placed on Lonely Astronaut Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. creffett (talk) 23:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Lonely Astronauts


A tag has been placed on The Lonely Astronauts requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. creffett (talk) 23:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

No Other
So great to see the publicity for this fantastic album, after so many years. Your input is noted and thankedMuso805 (talk) 14:28, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

I would also like to thank you for expanding the article. No Other is easily one of my favorites of all time. I grieve in stereo (talk) 03:14, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited High Violet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/High_Violet check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/High_Violet?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tonight (The Big Pink song)


The article Tonight (The Big Pink song) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not satisfy WP:NSONG. Has been in CAT:NN for over eleven years, hence the PROD."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – DarkGlow • 20:28, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Big Pink Tonight.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Big Pink Tonight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ~ GB fan 10:26, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you!
I saw that you were the main contributor for The Stars of the Lid Page! Thanks for helping make WikiPedia as cool a place as it is <3 EggsnBlakey (talk) 00:40, 13 March 2024 (UTC)