User talk:RESeletsky

Welcome!
Hi RESeletsky! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Nardog (talk) 16:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Paris 05:59: Théo & Hugo, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 16:16, 7 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you. My observations about the incorrect running time/speed of the BluRays of this film are indeed from personal experience. Being a scholar, it is a problem, as all of them list a correct running time while being, in actuality, inaccurate. Communication with the actual companies yielded nothing because they have refused to acknowledge the speed/pitch errors.
 * As for 'welcoming' me, that is rather odd, as I have made many contributions over the years. Perhaps I forgot to sign in when making them. RESeletsky (talk) 16:26, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Paris 05:59: Théo & Hugo. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 18:43, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

You may also want to read PAL speedup, Television standards conversion, Three-two pull down, etc. Nardog (talk) 18:52, 7 December 2022 (UTC)


 * This is tough. I am very well-versed in the areas of PAL vs. NTSC, 4:3 pull-down, etc., but none of it applies because we are dealing with a theatrical frame rate of 24fps, both for film and BluRays. It isn't all that common to find BluRays that had been created from PAL masters and ran 4% fast and a semitone sharp. Here we are dealing with the opposite situation. The discs run 4% slow and, in the case of the Peccadillo issuance, a semitone flat (Wolfe having corrected the pitch). I am not even certain how this error was achieved. Moreover, at least the American company that released the disc won't even admit it. Thus, most sources for the discs as well as the film list a running time of 97 minutes, which does not hold true for the disc releases. RESeletsky (talk) 19:34, 7 December 2022 (UTC)