User talk:REVOSMITTY

Recent edits to Maisy
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Maisy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:15, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Maisy Mouse, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''I did not see any new citations when you undid that revert. Please do not reinstate that edit without providing reliable sources.'' Aasim 00:59, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Recent edit to Ralph Macchio
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Ralph Macchio article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on John Smith (actor). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Also see WP:NPOV  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:01, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at John Smith (actor).  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:18, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

'tis established fact, dear
 * Find a reliable source. also stop removing sourced material from white nationalism.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:21, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your "sourced" material is biased nonsense.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 06:22, 18 February 2020 (UTC)


 * As shown in this edit, you added material that violated Wikipedia's NPOV policy, and added unsourced content in this edit.

Dipshit, I never claimed it wasn't racist. On the page for White Nationalism it states: "White nationalism is a type of nationalism or pan-nationalism which espouses the belief that white people are a race". I removed that idiocy, 'cause... you know... race actually exists; furthermore, the "source" for this comes from a book written by some SPLC clown who isn't a geneticist. Would you not agree this 'source' is questionable at best? Oh and yeah... I'm definitely doing some deep soul searching. Thank you for your concern, random fuck on Wikipedia.
 * And talk page access revoked because Wikipedia requires at least the emotional stability and common sense of the toddlers I work with. Ian.thomson (talk) 10:59, 18 February 2020 (UTC)


 * I saw last night's edits and was considering a block. If I'd been the first to see this morning's I would have blocked. Doug Weller  talk 08:43, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Good to know Doug. *thumbs up*

Really?
Do not create another account.

When you are ready to approach this site like a grown-up, you can use WP:UTRS to appeal your block.

If you try using UTRS to complain about us or the article, or whatever, you're going to lose that privilege.

If you keep trying to make accounts, then you're just going to guarantee that the White nationalism article forever stays the way it is because we'll assume anyone trying to carry out the change you wanted is just another sockpuppet of yours. Ian.thomson (talk) 11:11, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Checkuser block
I've now updated this to a checkuser block. Given the logged-out racist edits made by this account that were vile enough to require rev-deleting, they should not be unblocked.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:27, 24 February 2020 (UTC)