User talk:RFN98

August 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tampa Bay Rays has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:22, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tampa Bay Rays was changed by RFN98 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880208 on 2017-08-27T14:22:18+00:00.

August 2017
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Tampa Bay Rays. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Echoedmyron (talk) 21:44, 27 August 2017 (UTC) Your recent editing history at Tampa Bay Rays shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tampabay721 (talk) 01:59, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Echoedmyron (talk) 14:54, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring at Tampa Bay Rays
You've been warned for edit warring per a complaint about your edits at the edit warring noticeboard. I hope that the current rewording of the lead will be satisfactory to all parties. ("..St. Petersburg, Florida, part of the Tampa Bay Area.") If you revert again without first getting a consensus on the talk page you may be blocked from editing. If you still don't like the lead, make your objection known on the talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC)