User talk:RHaworth/2018 Jan 12

Emotional Speech Blocks Deletion Syndrome
[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Symbiosis Institute of Business Managment
As you are the protecting admin, can you please fix the double redirect to Symbiosis International (Deemed University). Also, the spelling of 'management' is wrong in the title so can you please move the page to the correct title. Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 12:18, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect created on correct spelling. Given the past history, no harm in leaving the one on the wrong spelling. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Erfan Kasraie
Hello Sir, Could you explain your deletion of draft:Erfan Kasraie? I think it was your mistake. It was not a copy-paste from somewhere else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scientificfuture (talk • contribs) 13:55, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Yes, mistake. It was a copyvio from erfankasraie.com but in any case kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks you are notable and writes about you here. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

AHEM
I am not using this as a web host, as it's just a group of anti-vandalism editors. &mdash; German Gamer  77  19:56, 20 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Noted. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Restore Garuda (2018) Page
Hi RHaworth, I have create Garuda (2018 film), Kannada movie, which is no where related to the old movie of Garuda and our movie is under post-production and can you please explain what was the issues in deleting the page and how can we restore it. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harendra2640 (talk • contribs) 09:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Kindly have the decency to wait until a) it has actually been released and b) someone with no CoI thinks it is notable and writes about it here. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Impedehim socks
These socks apparently belong to Sockpuppet investigations/Fixer88, so I've tagged them as such. The master has been unblocked by arbcom and may be unrelated, but I'll leave that for the SPI people to sort out. Please make sure everything in Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Fixer88 has their talk page access revoked, as they are still spouting nonsense on talk pages. Thanks! – Train2104 (t • c) 23:46, 21 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Noted. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Deletions
Thank you very much for deleting this page and this page – do you think they need a little salt? Happy Holidays!  Paine Ellsworth   put'r there  02:06, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

And again, thank you very much and Happy New Year!  Paine   02:52, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Salted. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Query on deletion
The page Jaathivyavasthitiyum Keralacharitravum has been deleted. This was a social history published in the early 80s that raised a storm in the historical circles and was widely talked and discussed in the public space. This book debunked the then prevailing half researched histories and is must to any person attempting to study Kerala History or the caste system in Kerala. More details needed to go into the page and I was still looking into how full details and links could be provided. Please restore the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pkjaya (talk • contribs) 06:52, 22 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your book is notable and writes about it here. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

move an article
Hello, i can an article user created draft version article name: Draft:Aap Ke Aa Jane Se can you please move this draft: With a new name like, Aap Ke Aa Jane Se Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Http002 (talk • contribs) 15:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)


 * First, expand it into a proper article written in English. Then click the "submit" link on the AfC tag. If it gets accepted, it will be moved for you. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

ANPR in the UK
Re: Automatic number plate recognition in the united kingdom. Hi, did you see the speedy deletion being contested on the talk page? The amount of copied text was a small part of the page and mich of it was quotes so not a copyvio. I believe your actions were unjustified. What is the procedure to review this? &mdash; Whizz40 (talk) Thank you. We are all volunteers and have a lot of responsibilities outside. Your comments here reflect only on yourself. Whizz40 (talk) 18:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Whizz40, you don't deserve it! You could not get the title right and you did not link to it but I have restored it nonetheless. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:10, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Undelete Talk:ePUAP
RHaworth, please do not delete talk pages without any previous consideration. There's an outgoing undeletion request as the speedy deletion of this article was irrelevant. If the deletion is considered irrelevant and contested, you should not delete its related pages. Besides, you didn't check its links – this talk page contained a message to the other admin about this misunderstanding and was a reference on Requests for undeletion. If we were only using policies (like G8), we would not have admins, but only bots for this job. Please restore it now! --RezonansowyakaRezy (talk &#124; contribs) 00:52, 23 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Restored. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:19, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

South Shore Furniture
Hi RHaworth. I do not consider South Shore Furniture to be "Unambiguous advertising or promotion". Please reconsider your speedy deletion of the article. &mdash; Cunard (talk) 04:42, 23 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Two restores on the trot - am I going soft? Cunard, why did you clutter up the AfD discussion with refs. Why not put them in the article? Please reply. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:19, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Uniranks
Please restore UniRanks Ranking of Rankings of World Universities. I had not had the chance to respond yet about the importance of the article, and it was speedily deleted. In fact the aggregate ranking by UniRanks is quite important and it should not be deleted. The importance of this ranking is discussed in this blog on https://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-search-selection/1960403-uniranks-2017-aggregate-ranking-of-multiple-rankings-of-world-universities.html. There are ranking like the Times Higher Education 'Table of Tables' that aggregate the results of the three main ranking tables in the UK into one ranking table for students to use. This is similarly done for international rankings by UniRanks. Please promptly restore The Ranking of Rankings by Uniranks page as it is very important for some students. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikecurry1 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Take it to DRV or simply re-submit via AfC. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Please have the courtesy to restore this as you have others. I do not know how to go about re-submitting articles. It was erased in a matter of 5 minutes. Other articles such as Imperial College London link to it in their rankings section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikecurry1 (talk • contribs) 10:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Please read this. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:16, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

ho, ho, ho
Hi, Neddy wishes everybody a very merry Xmas (suggestions of direct ancestory with one of the eyewitnesses to the happy event have, so far, proved unfounded). &mdash; Coolabahapple (talk) 23:12, 23 December 2017 (UTC)]]

Sapience
Error in your home page: you state "distinct sub-species of homo sapiens". This is improper form; Genera start with a capital letter, and the whole name should be italicized. &mdash; Tiptopper (talk) 03:49, 24 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Fixed. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Socking abandoned
Hi there. I noticed that you summarily deleted the profiles I created at Ronald P. Schaefer, Steve Babaeko and Draft:Ogaga Ifowodo without giving me a chance to defend myself. The reason was listed as G6 Undisclosed Paid Editing. This issue has been investigated in a sockpuppet investigation and I've been cleared. You can read more about it on my talk page. The profiles you deleted were NOT created via paid editing. The subjects are important and notable academic and professional subjects in African linguistics, entertainment, and literature, and deserve to be profiled. If there is an issue with the profiles, I believe that my attention should have been called to them before a summary delete is executed since both pages had been reviewed and relevant edits made to them by the wikipedia community before now. Therefore, I am writing to request that you please kindly undelete the pages and the draft as soon as you can, so I can continue to improve them. I'll appreciate it. Thank you. Igwatala (talk) 07:58, 24 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Restored. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Stephen Dure
Hi there. Could you please explain why you deleted Stephen Dure as G10? I re-checked it and I still don't see it. Regards  So Why  10:19, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Gosh - four more restores! Oh well, it is Christmas. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:37, 24 December 2017 (UTC)


 * You have restored the article Stephen Dure after it was deleted because of G:10. As an admin I could have deleted this myself because of a potential BLP violation, but I left it to another admin, who concurred with my opinion. I proposed this speedy deletion because of naming and shaming a person who was never convicted and who then took his own life. There is no room for such an despicable article in wikipedia. At this moment this article has been proposed for deletion by User:Cnzx and another user has already removed this naming and shaming.


 * The same goes for the article Dark Justice (group) by the same author User:Reg Hill, where a number of convicted people have been named. The article could well do without naming these people and having just stated that the court has already successfully secured the prosecution of six men. This article can survive on its own merits without naming the convicts. &mdash; JoJan (talk) 13:10, 25 December 2017 (UTC)


 * JoJan, your speedy tag made no indication of what you felt was being attacked. But in any case speedy was the wrong approach - you should have removed the offending material and, if you felt strongly, hidden the edits containing it. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:07, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!


TheSandDoctor (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas6}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Deletion of National English Honor Society
Wondering why that page was deleted? any info appreciated, thanks. Benevmull (talk) 03:53, 25 December 2017 (UTC)


 * A member of the Guild of Copy Editors ought to know: that new messages go at the bottom of a talk page, always to provide a link to the page about which they are talking and should not need to be told to read this. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:07, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Saralization
I want my article back Amrmagdiahmed (talk) 22:50, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Nope. Alex Shih (talk) 02:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC)


 * You cannot be sarious. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:22, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Rhodoquinone Deletion?
Why did ÿou delete Rhodoquinone? Are you going to delete every single other wiktionary redirect? Have they suddenly become forbidden? Please explain, as you did not respond on Talk:Rhodoquinone. &mdash; Nessie (talk) 00:06, 26 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Compare Village pump (proposals). &mdash; Huon (talk) 00:52, 26 December 2017 (UTC)


 * You don't deserve it. "Are you going to delete &hellip;" - ridiculous generalisation - how many similar have I deleted? &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:22, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Marilyn
Hello. Are you able to let me finish my page on Marilyn Monroe's evening gown and shawl? It was protected. I was working on it slowly. I wasn't aware that the page had to be finished before it was published. My apologies and Merry Christmas! &mdash; Uncoveringcelebrityhistory (talk) 05:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC)


 * You seem to have managed it now. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:22, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Unsalting request
Hey, could you unsalt the What Culture Pro Wrestling and WhatCulture Pro Wrestling pages. The article has been recreated at Defiant Wrestling and just survived an AfD, so those two should be redirected to that article. &mdash; REEEEEbbon Salminen   (talk''')  10:00, 26 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirects created. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

LÉ William Butler Yeats - move rationale?
Hiya. In the absence of an edit summ, or a related talk-page discussion, can you help me understand the rationale for this move? I ask primarily as I'd like to understand the implications before addressing any redirection or other changes that may be appropriate on the calling pages and templates (like Samuel Beckett-class offshore patrol vessel, Template:Irish Naval Service, Template:Active Irish Naval Service Vessels). And, indeed, the convention which seems to have been adopted for all of the current and past vessels linked from these targets. Any information you can provide on the rationale or drivers for the move would assist in avoiding re-work or conflicting edits. (I am sure there is a rationale. And I'm sure its sound. I would like however to understand it. So we can consider what to do with the other 16 vessel articles that use a similar naming convention). Cheers. Guliolopez (talk) 18:39, 26 December 2017 (UTC) Hiya. To be honest I don't feel especially strongly about it. And, as you imply yourself, wouldn't normally see the need for a parens suffix - except in the case of a DAB issue. However, that said, the current/previous does seem to be based on some kind of convention (whether well-considered or not), and before seeking to break from that convention, it might be worth a discussion. As you suggest/imply, what I might do is move it back - but then open a thread on some related articles/templates/etc. And see if any consensus can be established. To either justify the status quo. Or to affect a change to it. Guliolopez (talk) 11:18, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * To my disgust, I find that utterly unnecessary suffices are widespread in articles about naval vessels so if you insist on moving it back, I shall take no action. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

RDNG page is work in progress
Hi, I'd like to know why this page is deleted? Regards, Vidhya (Vidvin) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vidvin (talk • contribs) 04:36, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Please read this. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi,
Hi, in response to an OTRS ticket, are you sure about your recent deletion of Pa Sulay Njie. Additionally, can you give the user-name of the creator of the recently deleted material? And wishing your and your's a pleasant 2018! Winged Blades Godric 10:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Assuming that his DoB is not also an hoax, then he has the same birthday as me. Edit history and last state emailed. At a quick glance the text is the result of steady development. Ie. it is not a case that one sometimes sees where a valid article has been replaced by invalid text. If you need more, just ask. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:08, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Near-hoax. But not entirely. See this. I think that is restorable. Pending talks with the guys at FOOTY, will be looking at an AFD. Regards:) Winged Blades Godric 05:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Poking:) Winged Blades Godric 06:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Roger W. Haworth
Hi, could you kindly explain why exactly the article Admitad was deleted? — Preceding Nat.johnson comment added by Nat.johnson (talk • contribs) 14:50, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Please read this. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:02, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Theo Salisbury
I see you have deleted Category:Theo Salisbury he has created a draft Draft:Theo Salisbury with the same promotional content, I’ve declined three times but he’s not getting the message. &mdash; Theroadislong (talk) 20:08, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Note the : trick to create a link to a category instead of placing a page in that category. As long as he confines his activities to draft:Theo Salisbury, I say: keep declining - he will give up eventually. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Need all your help
Hi, RHaworth I just wanted to say thanks for helping me out right there. By the way, I'm just new over here and I guess I might need your help every time when I'm trying to make-up an article or page. But if you're willing to help me, be my guest. Okay, Gontle Galefite (talk) 22:40, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Gontle Galefite (talk) 22:40, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi, people I think I might need your help every time when I'm trying to make-up an article / page. If you're willing to help me out, be my guest. Okay, Gontle Galefite (talk) 22:44, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Gontle Galefite (talk) 22:44, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for all that. By the way, I'm new right here and I guess I might need your help every time when I'm tryin to make-up an article / page. But if you're willing to help me out, be my guest. Okay RHaworth, Gontle Galefite (talk) 22:49, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Gontle Galefite (talk) 22:49, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Noted. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Gainge Management Deleted
Hello, I noticed that you've deleted Gainge Management page. It was a translated page of an existing subject in the Korean Wikipedia. I tried to translate it into objective language and posted it for information purposes only. could you please verify which part seemed promotional? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gainge0691 (talk • contribs) 23:16, 27 December 2017 (UTC) now renamed to
 * Mainly the author's user name! But kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for deleting my flagged pages!
I just wanted to thank you for deleting User:Noah Kastin/custompagetabs and User:Noah Kastin/Achievements, which I had flagged for deletion. Noah Kastin (talk) (🖋) 11:49, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Problematic user
Hi, RHaworth I think this user has some problem, I don't know what should be done now. He kept recreating the AfD page you deleted Articles for deletion/ChristiWilken. After I tagged it first, I welcomed them, but they just recreat the page without understanding anything or any other edit. &mdash; Ammarpad (talk) 14:35, 29 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Problem seems to have been resolved. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Happy New Year, RHaworth!


Happy New Year! RHaworth, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Boomer VialHappy Holidays! • Contribs 07:18, 31 December 2017 (UTC) Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
 * Thank you. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Happy New Year
Hi RHaworth, May this new year bless you in surprising and joyful ways. You are truly a most valued Wikipedian. - Samf4u (talk) 14:59, 1 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Marcel De Graaff.jpg
Hi noticed you removed my image I uploaded, I provided a complete license including the web page detailing it's free use. Care to explain how the image cannot be used? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harry-Oscar 1812 (talk • contribs) 13:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * In what respect is it your image? In its presence on flickr its licence includes the NC and ND clauses. Neither of which is compatible with Wikimedia which demands a cc-by-sa-4.0 or compatible licence. Nor cannot it be uploaded as fair use because, as explained here, since the guy is still living a free image should be readily available. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:20, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Erica Garner
Another Happy New Year, eh? I observe that you deleted File:Erica_Garner.png at 15:13, 2 January 2018 citing F7, even though I contested this speedy deletion. Please revert as everything was in order – the subject was deceased, a search for free images was unavailing and a non-free use rationale was supplied. &mdash; Andrew D. (talk) 16:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Others have explained the issue to me and matters have moved on now. We can perhaps discuss the matter over a beer at the next London Wikimeet.  Cheers!  Andrew D. (talk) 10:42, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Hitchens and the hitchslap
Continuing my post from the December archive, I have added a line to the Christopher Hitchens article that defines "hitch-slap". The edit has been around for a week and has not been disputed. Can we get this (especially the non-hyphenated version) made into a redirect? Thanks. Connor Behan (talk) 17:41, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! Connor Behan (talk) 22:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Done. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Deleting: Draft: Marcello Farabegoli
Dear Mr. Haworth, the page www.marcello-farabegoli.net is now a public domain - at the bottom of the page you can find "The text of this page (home) is released under the Creative Commons Zero Waiver 1.0 (CC0)")". The list of names on the page http://www.mak.at/en/salottovienna_-_brviennese_art_salon_in_trieste is certainly not copy-right protected, because it is the list of personalities that have been presented at the "Salotto.Vienna" and thus, in my opinion, directly conntected to the co-curator (co-author) Marcello Farabegoli of the event. If you wish, I will make a small selection of them. Please let me know if I am allowed to recreate the article. Thanks in advance and best regards, IIO2017 alias Alexander Pallaver — Preceding unsigned comment added by IIO2017 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 2 January 2018 (UTC)


 * You have done it without waiting for my answer. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Talk:𝕆
Hello RHaworth, could you please review Talk:𝕆, seems to be a hoax. Delete and create protect? Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 22:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Done. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Equidate
Could you please restore this article either to my user page or the original article space? I've been working on it, and would be happy to continue working to overcome any ADVERT issues. I need to see the revision history to know what happened, though, and to access my previous edits that were designed to improve sourcing and encyclopedic tone. Thanks, - Wikidemon (talk) 23:07, 3 January 2018 (UTC) Thanks much! - Wikidemon (talk) 01:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Restorated. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

EyesOnALZ (Alzheimer's research project)
Dear RHaworth, I would like to ask about the deletion of the article on EyesOnALZ. It used material from the primary source (http://hcjournal.org/wecurealz/) and I have received their verbal permission to use the description (my fault, I did not ask to provide the correct type of copyright to Wikipedia). Different page (http://www.seriousgamemarket.com/2017/10/citizen-science-games-speeding-up.html) also used exactly the same information (parts word to word) from the primary source and therefore it was marked as copyright violation of the latter page. I would like to ask if/how a page can be restored with some parts deleted or rewritten? I do not have draft saved so it would be a shame to lose all citations. Thanks in advance and best wishes, Marschalka (talk) 09:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Please read this. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:16, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Query on deletion
Hi. Is your deletion correct when there're some objections? -- Janggun Dungan (talk) 16:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Stop fussing. If you ever manage to find your way to Deletion Review and get Prapimporn Karnchanda restored, it will take you but a moment to re-create the redirect at Prapimporn Kanjunda. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:16, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Deleted sandbox
Hi there, I'm new to wiki and was doing a draft in user:203.10.43.238/sandbox yesterday and you deleted it - would you be able to explain why? I'd like to get it right rather than be annoying and keep posting the same thing! Any help would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trotters84 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Restored. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:16, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Riverton Lock
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Milan Mathew Kordestani
This feels like an abuse of power. Your initial problems with the page were that it didn't have significant coverage of Milan as an equestrian. But now the article is much cleaner, and everything is cited and unbiased, yet you still nominate it for deletion. Come on, there are tons of references, media coverage, etc. Take a look at the draft Draft:Milan Mathew Kordestani. Actually read it. Compare it to Mary Gaylord McClean. I agree, the first two pages were like an advertisement, but this draft is not, it clearly has references and is written unbiasedly. Don't contest it just because the articles were poorly written in the past. This one passes all of Wikipedia's rules. Come on man what's going on? Please don't just delete pages, I want to fix the problem, not just cut it out, that's not productive and not what Wikipedia is about. All the best to you and I hope we can work this out. 2603:3024:1827:6E00:E5F4:8F40:4726:D8CA (talk) 00:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

BitExpress deleted
Roger, you left a note about deletion of the BitExpress stub. I do not have any problem with your deletion, but I prefer to tell you at least the reason, why I created that stub: I stumbled over a read link on the Digital Radio Mondiale pointing to bitXpress and tried to find out what it might had be the intended place. The only possible solution was BitExpress, which broadcasts in DRM. So I decided to create a stub with a link to their site for more info instead of a dead redlink. I do not have any connections and interest to do any advertising. So I will leave it as you want it. Lets keep links to dead pages in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Treutwein (talk • contribs) 13:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Celtic Collections
Hi RHaworth I'm quite new to Wikipedia can I just ask the reason why our Celtic Collections Wiki page was deleted by you on Jan 1st 2018 the page had been live for nearly 3 months before you it was deleted? &mdash; Andrew Murphy Celtic (talk) 17:15, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , can I check whether you have declared that you a a paid editor yet, as discussed at User talk:Andrew Murphy Celtic? &mdash; Cordless Larry (talk) 06:35, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

, We got it looked at by a local journalist to check the grammar and layout I then gave up myself as I seemed to be going around in circles, an intern in the office gave it ago back in September/October and got it sorted and published so I'm confused to why it was deleted nearly 3 months later. &mdash; Andrew Murphy Celtic (talk) 11:57, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I will leave it to RHaworth to explain that,, but you seem to be dodging the WP:PAID issue. Have any of these editors, including the intern, made the declaration required by the terms of use? &mdash; Cordless Larry (talk) 12:46, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

, I'm not dodging the PAID issue I told you we got a journalist to check it over the intern was on work experience and wasn't paid what more information do you need? I can see now it has been refused which I find very odd considering it was approved back in October and nothing has changed maybe you can explain that? &mdash; Andrew Murphy Celtic (talk) 13:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , WP:PAID states that "Interns are considered employees for this purpose. If they are directed or expected to edit Wikipedia as part of an internship, they must disclose". Moreover, as you explained here, you've been hired to write these articles, so you need to make the disclosure too. It's not hard to do - just follow the instructions at WP:PAID. &mdash; Cordless Larry (talk) 14:14, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * , you certainly are dodging the paid issue. Where is your declaration of paid editing? But kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Big Time Records
Hey I saw you deleted Big Time Records (United States) back in 2011, can you send me the text? Have an awesome day! Aaron Anon308308 (talk) 20:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC) IDK why that needs to be there, but it's there hahaahah I'm confused, I read the link, but it isn't showing that for this page anymore, since I reposted it. It's a true company, does it need more external links to prove that? Some news articles stating some of their shows, just trying to understand why it's being deleted. &mdash; Anon308308 (talk) 22:22, 8 January 2018 (UTC) Aaron
 * Done haha. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Aaron, you ask "was there a reason it was deleted?" Please read this. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:10, 8 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Oh dear, the deletion log entry has now become terribly difficult to find - you have to click on "view history" and then on "view logs for this page". "True company": Wikipedia is not a trade directory. Indeed there are several Wikipedia articles about fictitious companies. Try and get your head round the concept of notability. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Thilliarsingham
Hello again. I noticed that was blocked as a sock of  but that the latter is not blocked. I just wondered if it was an omission or voluntary. Thanks, — Paleo Neonate  – 10:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Intentional. In the highly unlikely event that user;Thilliarsingham wished to write here on subjects other than himself, I would have no object to his doing so. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Submission of Clarence McNair page
Greetings Roger, I have been trying to upload information about myself, which keeps getting deleted. I've re-edited the page several times so that the information doesn't seem ambiguous, however the page continues to get deleted. Can you help me write the page, so that I am within the guidelines? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clarence McNair (talk • contribs) 23:23, 7 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Clarence, help you?! You cannot be serious. You write about yourself on facebook. Here, you wait until a) you become notable and b) someone with no CoI writes about you. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

ThirdLove
I submitted an article for review at Draft:ThirdLove, and when i just checked it shows that you deleted it. The reason given was that it was a copyright violation and a direct copy of an article from Inc.com. I can assure you that i did not copy anything feom Inc.com amd anything included in the article was paraphrased. Also, can you please tell me the specific wording that you belive was a direct copy as I can rewrite or remove it to your satisfaction. Can you please restore the article so that it can be reviewed? Thank you for your time. -- Barkroid (talk) 02:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Surely Brakroid would have been a better user name? Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Botha spamming
Good day RHaworth., Can you please send me the info of the deleted page User:JD Botha/sandbox. My intention is not to bridge the G11 rule, I would like the article to show the technological advantages of new timber products for industrial uses etc. science journals has been written about the product as you will see in the deleted article. I was also not finished with the article, can you please advise on what the main reason is for my G11 rule bridging? Thank you in advance. J.D Botha JD Botha (talk) 10:27, 8 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Please read this. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Done as requested above, Please mail me the deleted article for revision purposes. JD Botha (talk) 10:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)


 * And have you ticked "allow other users to email me" in your preferences? Be aware that &reg; is not required in articles here and that I am liable to delete on sight any article that contains it - especially one that contains it as often as yours did. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Apologies, My email was not confirmed. will redo the article as soon as it is send to me. Thank you so much. JD Botha (talk) 11:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Zaid Ali
Hello Roger, earlier today I moved Draft:Zaid Ali to user NS at User:Zayyam123/Zaid Ali because it was declined. Why would you revert my move? -- Saqib (talk) 12:23, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

OK. Because its submission was declined and the page cited unreliable sources which make it promotional so I thought we need to move it to user userspace. --Saqib (talk) 13:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Why did you do the move to user space? It was perfectly OK in draftspace. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)


 * There was no need to move it. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

bitglass
Hello, regarding the Wikipedia page for bitglass. This was created as a stub a year ago Jan 2017, and deleted before it was not populated. Last week, I created a complete page with over a dozen press and patent references. sent a note to the original Admin who deleted it, but he has not yet responded. please check the contents of the page you deleted. "bitglass wiki" is a popular search on google. and here is a list of articles on the Wall Street Journal on the company. Thanks for restoring this page in full. &mdash; Bnkausik (talk) 15:25, 8 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Please read this. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Don't understand your link. Company has hundreds of mentions just in the Wall Street Journal. Gather that does not merit a wikipedia page? I do have an email set up if you want to communicate directly. &mdash; Bnkausik (talk) 21:32, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

thanks for emailing content. as for re-submitting the article, how is that different from my first attempt last week? will be deleted by another admin? Bnkausik (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Text emailed. I suggest re-submit via AfC. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)


 * If you do not improve the references, then it is likely to be deleted again. But if you post in draftspace then it stands a good chance of surviving for six months. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Bobby Kalotee
Hello Mr. Haworth, You recently deleted by wikipedia page on Bobby Kalotee. Kindly help me fix the issues on the page so that I can either remove or edit them for the page to pass your and Wikipedia's criteria. Kindly feel free to email me to discuss further. Seems like you also deleted by sandbox page. Kindly let me know what and how can I fix it do retrieve my info back. If possible for both my page on Bobby and also my sandbox page kindly list 1. what text/link should I remove from it? 2. How can I restore my sandbox back with its previous contents? Thanks vaibhav — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sagar vaibhav (talk • contribs) 17:45, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Ask at DRV if you must. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Now at Deletion review/Log/2018 January 10. —Cryptic 18:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

about my account deletion
respected sir, I want ask to you why you deleted my account krishn kumar mishra from wikipedia what you fond wrong in my post and without providing any intial information how can you delete my account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.212.210.84 (talk) 06:47, 9 January 2018 (UTC)


 * It is not possible to delete accounts. Please read this and this. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Dennis Nagpal
Hi Admin, Can you please unprotect the draft which I need to create. The draft is by name Draft:Dennis Nagpal. I assure you that previous concerns are no longer a problem. Can you please fix the issue. The article which i need to create will be of proper referencing and will no longer have concerns in denying of article. Thanks in advance. Will be very grateful. &mdash; Hbunnylife (talk) 10:33, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi RHaworth, I am grateful to you for that. But i would request you to kindly allow me to edit the article and undelete it. I have already mentioned in my user that how am i connected to the person. I am gonna provide whatever detail, it will be with validated references. And will mention the resources accordingly. Will try to work on the article in the criteria of Wikipedia. And, sir i need to tell that i am not writing about the person to promote him. I just want make a article in which i do mention his work and how he made it to the position with all available references. So please i will request you to undelete it and give me a chance to improve the article. &mdash; Hbunnylife (talk) 14:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Hbunnylife, try not to be so long-winded. If you really can create a proper article, do so at draft:Dennis Nagpal (2). &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Pa Sulay Njie
Hello sir, I sent an email to your support team and they directed me here. In the past I created an article in draft called Pa Sulay Njie which was letter accepted but I found few days back you removed the page as G3 Pure vandalism and blatant hoaxes which is totally incorrect. The information in page was fully supported by sources from renown websites. The player has played for Gambian national team under 17 and under 20, played for Worchester city FC and also played for some other clubs. I have included some links in this email supporting his career so would like to request you please have a look at the page and fresh link below and restore the article. You can also search on Google. Thanks. Template:Unsigned IP --> — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.148.73.61 (talk) 15:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Please read this. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Sir I have created new account now can you please undelete the page. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elijahgraham26 (talk • contribs) 08:55, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Vice Media sexual harassment scandal
The article was an enhanced version of the subsection on the Vice Media article. Had more information - specifically details and more references. There are plenty of sub-sections to the Vice Media article that got their own articles via initiating exactly this method. I thought it deserved its own article. Any chance of restoring it? &mdash; Reaper7 (talk) 17:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)


 * It was not worth putting in a separate article so I have put your text into the main article. Also I am not sure whether "scandal" violates Wikipedia's neutral language rules. The media today report what they are calling the "Catherine Deneuve letter". Certainly some of the accusations levelled at the Vice Media executives sound like exactly the things that Deneuve and the other 99 are complaining about. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)


 * You don't think it it is worth putting in a separate article - however I think it is worth an article - especially as the story continues to evolve streaming into many new categories and parameters. You state that the use of the word scandal could violate wiki's neutrality language rules. I think it is past the stage of trying to lace with ambiguity what has happened by concentrating on the word 'scandal.' There have already been payouts and suspensions at the very top of Vice media. I mean CNBC put the word scandal in their headline and CNN and Business Insider described it as a scandal in their respective articles too to name but a few but I found in a 10 second google search, you could have solved that one if you had looked but I know passions can run high on a frshly deleted article. There may be an inadvertent neutrality issue on your side however. The "Catherine Deneuve letter" and the other 99 French women who signed it is an opinion on what has happened in general, could have happened and what may be happening. Whether an article should stay or not based on that opinion and its implications is beyond partisan. We simply need to report what has happened and again - the accusations have already resulted in pay outs over $100,000 by VICE Media. To what point the money was deserved or the severity crimes against the women was well represented is not for me or any other wikpedian to debate in the confines of the topic surely. Clearly you feel by what you have posted many of these women who worked for Vice may have exaggerated claims as the backlash against the Deneuve letter boils over - but is wiki anyplace to air that view? I am happy to link the article to the Me Too (hashtag) article. I mean by a fire sipping sherry - I am happy to debate the ethical sexual harassment consequences - for both men and women - and what should indeed be classed as sexual harassment but surely that is just for a debate outside wiki at this point and in the future. I am even curious to whether you think those 99 women in France who signed the letter did so themselves in a #MeToo frenzy! We could even debate what oil I rub into my beard twice a weak to make it more subtle. I joke of course to keep this good natured. However please could you reconsider the article's worth and potential and dare I say - even help me build the article from the ground up - a lot of your work is very impressive. I have noted the work you have a done on wiki and having read for some of the archives - I can clearly see how much dedication you have kindly lent to the project. Please reconsider - or at least give the article some breathing time to evolve. If you feel after a period the article is superfluous after that period, I am happy to concede. Thanks for your attention, Reaper7 (talk) 01:54, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Alcohol Concern
Hi Roger, I'm planning to write an article on Alcohol Concern (https://www.alcoholconcern.org.uk/) which is "the national agency on alcohol misuse for England and Wales" (source) and the org behind Dry January. I saw you speedy-deleted an article on it in September so I just wanted to check before starting if there's anything I should know about why that was. Was it just that the article was too empty to stay, or something I should take into account? Thanks! Mortee (talk) 22:02, 9 January 2018 (UTC)


 * They were both very short stubs. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Grand, thanks for confirming. I've written the article now. Hopefully it's an improvement. Mortee (talk) 00:26, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Swifty

 * ...does anyone fancy a swifty?!  ;)    >SerialNumber  54129 ...speculates 22:18, 9 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Wtf? &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * (joking response to Alcohol Concern, I think – swift == swift half) Mortee (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

About my articles
Hi, How are you? (Hussain Alakraf) Bahraini singer and songwriter. I added more than six sources What is the purpose of deleting the article??? Also Salwan Al Nasri, Ahmed AlSaadi, Jafar al-Kashmi & Nazar AlQatari. No need to delete such articles!.Can I request a return of the articles or is this a final decision? -- Regards -- IamIRAQI (talk) 23:43, 9 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The decision is certainly not final. Work on one person at a time . Create a well-referenced article and preferably do so via AfC. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Lisa Guillermin Gable
I wanted to discuss why Gable's page was deleted. I understand it was flagged for deletion due to being deemed promotional; however, Gable has been an influential person in the US government and private sector. I think she deserves to have a page. If there are edits you recommend to her page, I would gladly take them and make the edits. The page has been deleted making it impossible to do so at this point though. If you can provide a draft, I will work on it. Thanks! Beckylynn1219 (talk) 21:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Please read this. Re-create in draft space, submit it for review and wait for someone else to make it live. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Pericentral and other redirects
Hi. If you disagree with wiktionary redirect please comment at Village pump (proposals) before you delete those pages. --Nessie (talk) 23:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If you re-create, I will not touch them. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion of Æther Realm band page
Æther Realm page was deleted due to: "does not credibly indicate the importance or significance".

I had provided links to sources that demonstrate (a) the band had professionally produced 2 full-length albums, (b) the 2nd of which was voted album of the year by multiple members of an esteemed arbiter of the genre.

I also stated that the band had been on a real global tour with a band considered important/significant, whom I linked to, and that they had headlined a music festival (were well-known enough to do so).

I believe this covers both "credibility" and "significance" required by Credible_claim_of_significance. Other suggestions appreciated. -Galtenberg (talk)