User talk:RHaworth/2019 Apr 14

Emotional Speech Blocks Deletion Syndrome
[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Main problem
Hi, today I submitted a new Wikipedia article for review and I noticed it has been entirely deleted by you. Looking at the deletion log it shows a G12: copyright infringement related to a reference used for the article. Could you please let me know what I should change before submitting the page for a second opinion? Thanks for your time. With the advice I hope to get my article approved, I have spent a lot of time on it and did quite a lot of research in the area I live, which is where this company was founded and contributed to the majority of employment here, which, as result, developed the art, sports, and so on. A noteworthy company not only for the area, but also internationally as it is the leader for poultry processing, a primary protein for humankind with the lowest CO2 footprint. — Dotsonti Let's Talk! 15:56, 29 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Fix these copyvios and reduce the text to half the current length. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Hi RHaworth, last Friday I submitted a new Wikipedia article for review (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Meyn) and I noticed it has been entirely deleted by you. Looking at the deletion log it shows a G12: copyright infringement related to a reference used for the article. Could you please let me know what I should change before submitting the page for a second opinion? Thanks for your time. With the advice I hope to get my article approved, I have spent a lot of time on it and did quite a lot of research in the area I live, which is where this company was founded and contributed to the majority of employment, which, as result, developed arts, sports, and so on. A noteworthy company not only for the area, but also internationally as it is the leader for poultry processing, a primary protein for humankind with the lowest CO2 footprint. — Dotsonti Let's Talk! 13:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

My mistake, I couldn't find my first post on your page anymore so I re-posted. Your explanation is very clear, I went through the copyvios scan and understand the report, I will make adjustments accordingly. Regarding the length of the article, I will summarize the text under the section Products in just a few sentences by writing about the product categories rather than the products itself in detail. Thanks for your advice, I really appreciate the supportive comments. Also, if there is any way I can contribute to Wikipedia besides writing articles, please let me know. My English grammar is quite up to standard / 'up to par' so I might be able to help in that respect on newly submitted articles. — Dotsonti Let's Talk! 09:14, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * You obviously have not read my reply to your previous message. So what are the chances that you will read this one? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:10, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Other ways if contributing: start by reviewing new pages and recent changes. Reasonably soon you could become an AfC reviewer but read this carefully first. And you can aspire to adminship but think in terms of years to get there! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Copyright
Hey, man. Why did you delete my draft of the West of Scotland Amateur Cup for copyright? The page was mostly a straight copy from that website because it is a list of teams who won the cup. I can't exactly change the team names, can I? — A warm glass of shut the hell up (talk) 16:18, 30 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Learn wikilinks. You could not even manage to create a butlleted list. Take the matter to DRV. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:14, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedied CAD layer name redirects
Hi Roger, I'm sorry to bother you, but you recently deleted a bunch of redirects created by me, which were nominated for speedy deletion. The reason incorrectly given in the nomination by the nominator was WP:R3 "impausible typo or misnomer", which, however, does not apply, as these are neither typos nor misnomers, and also not implausible. The names may look a bit strange to someone not familiar with the corresponding CAD tools (like the nominator), but these redirects are in fact standard terms and abbreviations used in the industry for the CAD layers presenting the solder stop and solder paste/cream mask information discussed in the corresponding target articles. New users of EDA tools such as EAGLE, TARGET or Protel are typically not fully accustomed to how their designs are actually presented in transfer file formats (like Gerber files) or how PCBs are actually produced technically, and consequential often mix up these names. Therefore, I created the redirects so that users running into these terms in PCB design and production will be directed to articles explaining the subject and giving background information. This is one of the very purposes of redirects per WP:RPURPOSE, making such redirects even desirable. Therefore, please undelete them:


 * GBS (Gerber)
 * GBS (Protel)
 * Gerber GBS
 * Protel GBS
 * GTS (Gerber)
 * GTS (Protel)
 * Gerber GTS
 * Protel GTS
 * Gerber Bottom Solder Mask
 * Gerber Top Solder Mask
 * bStop (EAGLE)
 * tStop (EAGLE)
 * EAGLE bStop
 * EAGLE tStop
 * Gerber GBP
 * Gerber GTP
 * Gerber Bottom Paste Mask
 * Gerber Top Paste Mask
 * GBP (Gerber)
 * GTP (Gerber)
 * GBP (Protel)
 * GTP (Protel)
 * Protel GBP
 * Protel GTP
 * TARGET PasteBot
 * TARGET PasteTop
 * PasteBot
 * PasteTop
 * EAGLE bCream
 * EAGLE tCream

Thanks for your time. -- Matthiaspaul (talk) 18:32, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * pinging, who tagged the redirects for deletion. --DannyS712 (talk) 18:34, 30 March 2019 (UTC)


 * They may be standard terms in the industry but are they notable outside the industry. If you can persuade GB fan to ask me to restore them, I will do so. If you recreate them yourself, I will not touch them. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:14, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * EAGLE and even more so TARGET are EDA tools still affordable enough (in some versions) to be in common use among hobbyists and in the education, not only in the professional world. By "industry" I meant both.

Per our established guidelines for redirects (WP:REDIR), redirects do not need to be "notable", they just need to be useful to some of our potential audience (and not conflictive by name with other stuff). Anyway, as a courtesy here is an ad-hoc reference by a large European printed circuits board manufacturer describing these terms as standard layers: "Beispiele für Standardlayer für Schablonendaten: EAGLE: tCream, bCream. Target: PasteTop, PasteBot. Protel: GTP, GTB". [Translation: Examples for standard layers for stencil mask data.] Many more references including the manuals of these tools could be used as further proof, but I don't think this is necessary, as this is an obvious case both on a factual level but also on the procedural one. These redirects should never have been nominated for speedy deletion per R3 in the first place because this criterium does not apply to them. I as much as anyone else knows that GB fan as the nominator is responsible for the deletions (per WP:BEFORE), not you. But he insists on that he did not actually delete the redirects and asked me to ask you as the one who deleted them technically. -- Matthiaspaul (talk) 16:09, 31 March 2019 (UTC)


 * I repeat: what does GB fan think? you can re-create them yourself. I add: you can go to DRV. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Here is what I think, User talk:GB fan. Short answer, I do not believe they are appropriate and believe they meet the intent of WP:R3.  ~ GB fan 10:48, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


 * So, go to DRV. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:10, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

WP:REFUND request
Hello RH: please restore all the Portal: subpages you deleted via WP:CSD G6. Since there are now assessments as to whether the single-page or multi-page versions are better for the encyclopedia, the only way these assessments can proceed is if the subpages are restored. Thanks in advance, UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:25, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I have deleted about 20 pages from the portal: namespace in the past month. Do you mean all of them? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:14, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * No, only the ones that are subpages, and only those that were speedily deleted because of reason G6. BUT unfortunately I need you to go all the way back, not just those you deleted in the last month. Thanks! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:53, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

I put the list at User talk:UnitedStatesian/Portal REFUND/RHaworth. All the parent portal pages still exist. Thanks again! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
 * To show willing I have restored Portal:Food/Selected article/44. But as for the rest I need you to go all the way back, check if they are needed - surely some are where the main portal page has been deleted - and list them for me. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I will work through them. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:10, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Request for undeletion / G13
Hi, I am requesting the undeletion of the Draft:Sebastian Hilli. I would like to edit the page and restore it. — Cupidsgraa (talk) 17:08, 31 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Learn wikilinks. Done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

os and Toolforge Trusty deprecation
Hello, Many thanks for your work on the Ordnance Survey links. Have you seen that the system running the os service group has been shut down: see here? Example of link that no longer works: this. Best wishes, Colin. -- CreagNamBathais (talk) 19:39, 31 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Colin, oh dear! My first reaction is: Help! I need someone to explain why my tool at wmflabs.org has been closed down but the tool with which it is intimately connected https://tools.wmflabs.org/geohack/geohack.php (called by coord) is still running. I am willing to move my tool somewhere else. I consider myself an experienced software developer but when I look at the page to which you link it is quite incomprehensible. I just need someone to talk me through the move. But I will persevere with trying to understand. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:10, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy delete
You deleted an article I created for Mathieu Amiot. I specified that I was waiting for their review. I checked their copy right and it states that the biographies can be copied and recreated for non-commercial use. Please undelete the page. — Jlastowski (talk) 21:15, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * You have answered your own question: the NC clause is not allowed. Please note that we do not shout, we do not transpose surname and given name and, if we want an article reviewed, we do not put it in mainspace. Your new version is more acceptable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:43, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy Delete
Hi, I noticed you've recently deleted my draft page for The Impact Of Hollywood On Australian Cinema. Another user moved it to a draft space where they said it was acceptable to edit and construct my article free from interruption. I am a university student and am completing this page as a part of a project. Can you please clarify why my draft was deleted? Thanks. Dunf10 (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dunf10 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Looking in,, there was no substantial content. Just make it again when you have enough material to start off with.  DGG ( talk ) 01:09, 1 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Your page consisted of: "I am a university student, who is completing this page as part of an assignment. Please do not delete." Wikipedia has no need of placeholders. So get on with your draft at Impact of Hollywood on Australian Cinema - note the capitalisation. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:43, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Can you restore
Category:1896 establishments in Lithuania you've deleted a while ago - I've populated it. More entries will come eventually. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:20, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * You could have re-created it yourself. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:43, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Delete content
hi I need my content my mail ozrenos@gmail.com Question can you send me example how to put my content and football cariere online on wikipedia. And one more thing everithing that i wrote how can i confirm to you because in my contetnt everithing is true and you think diferently. Or there is another way to make wikipedia normal biography page? Can you help me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teiros (talk • contribs) 10:28, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Please provide links to the pages which you would like me to email. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI writes about you here in English and at bs: in Bosnian. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:43, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

User:Rockstone35/list of banned users
Can I have User:Rockstone35/list of banned users sent to via email? I'd like to have it just for my own purposes! Thanks Rockstone  talk to me!   06:23, 3 April 2019 (UTC) Thank you so much! Rockstone  talk to me!   18:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:43, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Deleted sandbox, restore/send please?
Definitely on me for not looking closely enough at what I'd put together prior to submission. Please undelete/send body so I can rewrite properly, certainly using copyvios tool (which I was introduced to elsewhere on this page). — Barracuda1187 (talk) 17:17, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

MUCH appreciated. Barracuda1187 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:09, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Approval of speedy deletion of my recent article
Hello! You appear to have speedily deleted my article (Matt Lowne) under WP:CSD A7. I personally feel that this is unreasonable, as the clear showing of the subscriber counts and view counts of the individual in question are an indication of importance. If or when possible, I would greatly appreciate if you could explain to me why the above mentioned reasons are not sufficient indication of importance, and perhaps expand on what would constitute sufficient indication of importance, so that in future I may write articles of higher standard. Thank you in advance. — Singularities421 (talk) 22:02, 3 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Counts are insufficient. How about links to independent articles about him? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Sofia (Art Academy)
I noticed in the logs that you deleted the abandoned Draft:Sofia. I'm new to AfC reviewing and I'm unsure how to handle the recreation of deleted pages. Please see my review comment and advise. -- mikeu talk 22:10, 3 April 2019 (UTC) Thanks for the feedback, I'm new to AfC reviewing and still familiarizing myself with the process. --mikeu talk 16:20, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * mikeu, I have edited draft:Sofia Art Academy. If you see a previous draft deleted as spam that is a clear warning sign. But an abandoned draft deletion, even if it is about the same subject, is neutral neither giving a warning nor endorsing the subject as possibly notable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Deletion?

 * For earlier parts of this thread, see user talk:RHaworth/2019 Mar 30


 * The two images to which you linked don't prove anything in my view. "Correct" is a strange word to use. All Wikipedia articles must of course be factually accurate. But factually accuracy is not sufficient to make an acceptable article. We will see how your new draft fares. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:08, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

RHaworth: In your view, that's fine; you're more than entitled to your opinon. The photos clearly show a thread attacking him and one of them saying that he's purposely going to screw with his wikipedia and another stating in the comments that they need to "readact him from the annals" (meaning wiki, net etc). The original discussions and edits on his page that was here for years actually show vandalism from these people and even another editor on Wiki agreed with that. If that isn't proof of purposeful vandalism, I don't know what is. Please let me know when this can be resolved and the page can go public, it's really been going on long enough. Thank you, I appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonmaceachran (talk • contribs) 22:19, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Any word on this yet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonmaceachran (talk • contribs) 17:10, 4 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The ball is currently in your court. There won't be any news until you take some action. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:38, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

What action? I linked resources, I added a different bio etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasonmaceachran (talk • contribs) 08:40, 11 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Apologies. No action is currently needed by you. It says "this may take more than two months" - so how long has it been so far? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:58, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Blubles deleted
Dear RHaworth, You recently deleted Draft:Blubles, which I helped to create, due to copyright infringement. I am the owner of the material that was copied, which hosted the first version of the rules. However, the wikipedia page quickly became a better home for the rules, since it has more advanced formatting and viewership. To learn more about Copyright Infringement, I read through this guide to copyvios. If I remove the rules from my site, can you restore the draft page? — Ifyadig (talk) 23:00, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't blame you for wanting a different host from Wordpress: I find it horrible to use. But Wikipedia is not a free host. Post your rules on Wikia or another of these hosts. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:38, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Ruslan Sabirli
Hello, I am Azerbaijani mentalist and actor Ruslan Sabirli (Ruslan Sabirly). You deleted my page. I want to ask you to undelete it, and help me to make corrections on text. Best regards, Ruslan Sabirli — Preceding unsigned comment added by Russolini1979 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 5 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks you are notable and writes about you here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Polo G
This article you deleted should be reinstated. He has a song charting at number 95 on the Billboard Hot 100 this week, which definitely provides some notability. Also found some sources:. -- N  Ø  16:54, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Sampalpuri Odia
Sambalpuri language was at this title because of an RM discussion at the talk page; and editor has recently moved it to a new POV title, and when I when I tried to revert their move (using the summary: "rv: this was already discussed (see talk page); "Sambalpuri Odia" is probably not necessarily wrong, but it's not the most common term; if you would like to challenge the current consensus, you can start a new RM discussion: WP:RM"), I wasn't able to because in the meantime you had bizarrely decided to fully protect the former title. Would you be able to remove the protection from Sambalpuri language and revert the move? Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 15:23, 6 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Moved. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Request for Page Undeletion
Hi! I recently saw that a page I created called Linking Exoplanet Detection and Habitability was deleted by you saying that it duplicated another page exoplanet. The exoplanet page only talks about the characteristics and features of exoplanets, but does not go into detail about the methods of exoplanet detection and how these methods help in detection of life of these planets. Is it possible to undelete the page so that I can get the recovered content and make some changes to it before publishing it again? It is my first wikipedia article so I am still learning. — Sgadgil6 (talk) 17:10, 6 April 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgadgil6 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Your piece looked like a student essay instead of a Wikipedia article. Most of its content is already fully covered in methods of detecting exoplanets. Try adding the habitability section to the exoplanet article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:17, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the response. Can you send me the article content via email? — Sgadgil6 (talk) 23:42, 6 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Heidelberg‒Wiesloch Electric Railway
Please could Draft:Heidelberg‒Wiesloch Electric Railway be WP:REFUNDED to User:Sladen/Heidelberg‒Wiesloch Electric Railway. Many appreciations in advance — Sladen (talk) 22:09, 6 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Re: User:Digixhub
Hi, there seems to be some misunderstanding in one of your recent blocks. User &mdash;who I mistakenly reported to UAA then quickly 'reverted' myself—hasn't made any edit since the creation of their account in 2018 (log). The promotional edits in the sandbox of Digixhub were done by, so I suppose that doesn't warrant a block for. — RainFall (talk) 05:59, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The block of Digixhub was fully warranted and if Sruthitg123 tries again, I will block that account as a sock puppet. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Re: User:Lightsourcer
A draft which you recently deleted for reasons of copyright infringement has been recreated by the user Lightsourcer in the form of Robert M. Goldman. I deleted the copyrighted information that I could find in it, but more may still remain. FYI. Regards, Spintendo  17:01, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Seems OK now copyvio-wise. Not sure about notability-wise! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

why did you delete my draft
why did you delete my draft smashy bros the comic series add reason below. — Captain Yoshi (talk) 17:35, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:40, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Anesthesic problem
Hi, today I submitted a new Wikipedia article for review and I noticed it has been entirely deleted by you. Looking at the deletion log it shows a G12: copyright infringement. I put a lot of work into using peer reviewed references and have never heard of those websites, so not quite sure how it could be such clear case. Further, I started with a cut and paste from Local_anesthetic. To then delete all the work I did to improve that is quite rude. Further, how do I find the text? I probably put several hours in, so it is really disheartening to have it so speedily deleted. This is not very welcoming to people contributing. It should not have been hard to determine that none of my edits were a copyright violation.— Huckfinne (talk) 01:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:14, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Víctor Manzanilla
What was this moved from mainspace to draft please? GiantSnowman 13:32, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Especially now, as a result, we have a parallel history at Víctor Manzanilla Schaffer after overwrote the redirect to the Víctor Manzanilla... GiantSnowman 13:35, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Not an answer to your initial question, but there was no reason not to use both his surnames in the article title, since that is custom in the Spanish speaking world, and the references use both surnames. I propose to delete the draft articles, as the proper redirects are now in place (to Víctor Manzanilla Schaffer). -- Marbe166 (talk) 13:51, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

if you want to rename a page then use WP:RM, do not overwrite another article/redirect. GiantSnowman 13:54, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * You're right, that was a brain fart from my side. The reason I found this was because had moved Víctor Manzanilla to draft without a redirect, which lead to the redirect that was in place on Victor Mantzanilla Schaffer pointed to a redlink, and it was linked that way from the Deaths in 2019 page. -- Marbe166 (talk) 13:57, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * What are you doing? Restore the page, it is a stub, not a draft. --Marbe166 (talk) 13:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Yes I'm very confused. The person is clearly notable, no need for it to be in draft space (now at Draft:Víctor Manzanilla Schaffer). GiantSnowman 14:01, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I was puzzled by this curious edit and decided that it might survive better in draft space. Despite the assertions of notability, I think it is too stubby for mainspace but if 他删之石 can assure me that they will re-apply any speedy tag, I will move it to mainspace. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:09, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

I've literally never heard something being 'too stubby' for mainspace. How are people meant to find it to expand it? What matters is notability. GiantSnowman 14:30, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

We're still waiting... GiantSnowman 09:15, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I've added another broadsheet obituary and moved it back to mainspace. I don't speak Spanish well enough to work with the sources, so I'm afraid that's all I can really do. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  09:55, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * (also ping ) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  09:58, 9 April 2019 (UTC))

- thanks! I've restored some redirects as well. GiantSnowman 10:02, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I would still like to hear from 他删之石. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

draft: Marlon Mullen - deletion
Hi, I see you deleted the Marlon Mullen draft. Did you see my comments left in the talk page? -- Wil540 art (talk) 15:50, 8 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Learn to provide links. Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Paralikkunnu Juma Masjid
why did you delete my page Paralikkunnu Juma Masjid? what is the reason? what went rong with that page? plz explain and help --Asmkparalikkunnu (talk) 10:00, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I changed my mind for two reasons: if the Catholick church is allowed its own article then the masjid is also and although both the church and masjid articles are awfully stubby, they do have useful categories which do not belong in the village article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Speedy Delete - Undelete Request
Hi, you deleted the page Australian Dog Lover under the speedy delete provisions A7 and G11. I saw the tag come up and edited the page to demonstrate credible claims of significance or importance with references to a number of third party links that discussed the subject. I also edited the page to remove the perception of it being promotional in nature and reworded to be neutral and factual. I also disputed the original Speedy Delete tag in the talk section of the article and outlined how I edited/improved the page on the talk page, but it was deleted before anyone discussed this further with me... was happy to see notes to further adjust the article. — Printjockey (talk) 10:39, 9 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Learn wikilinks. Extremely dubious notability but restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Deletion
I see you have deleted a duplicate article:La compétence et la performance. Was the article in English or not? — <b style="color:#00205B">Woshiyiwei</b><b style="color:#0077C0">zhongguo</b><b style="color:#00205B">ren</b> (<b style="color:#0077C0">🇨🇳</b>) 13:04, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It was in French. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of Draft:Daniel P Dietz Jr.
Hi, I was editing the draft which was given for speedy deletion (Draft: Daniel P Dietz Jr.) and I stated that the material used was just a way to organize the various information, more of a template to organize. However, it was deleted as I was editing and I was confused, as this was a draft, it wasn't published as yet, nor did I give it for review, it also stated that I am free to make changes as long as it's not published. I made my case on the draft's talk page, but I wasn't given a response. Is there any way I could recover it as I also stated that I was making future edits and that I wasn't going to publish the other user's information. Thanks! User:Delta fiver (talk) 13:44, 9 April 2019 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Daniel_P._Dietz Hi I'm not sure about the difference between a wikilink and a link but this is the link to the draft, sorry User:Delta fiver (talk) 12:20, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I have just added wikilinks to two replies above but I won't do a third. Give me a link. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Knowing the difference is an important part of becoming a Wikipedian. Please study the footnote in this page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:40, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi again, I'm unsure on how to make these links, could you show me an example? — User:Delta fiver (talk) 15:00, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The footnote in this page contains an example. Have you not looked at it? Every discussion thread on this page contains examples. Your own signature, which I think you created in your preferences, contains two examples. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:50, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of Jhett Black Edition
Hello, I see you've deleted a page that I had contested the deletion request on. Once there was a keep request, the page needs to go through review. It's clear that the the reason I gave against the deletion on the article's talk page was completely ignored. The album charted on the official Japanese music chart Oricon, which is enough for an article to have a page. — Xenobia4 (talk) 02:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Please read my first reply at below. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Jhett Black Edition. I listed the article in the section heading. — Xenobia4 (talk) 00:10, 11 April 2019 (UTC)


 * You listed it but did you provide a link? Restored - fix the excessive amount of shouting . Do you think it would be a good idea to provide an article about the artiste before writing about his works? Please reply. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:58, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Please restore sandbox asap
Greetings User:RHaworth, Earlier today you deleted a newbie sandbox without warning, to my knowledge. This is the edit: 15:53, April 8, 2019 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page User:Leandramarie/sandbox (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion in userspace) The student whose sandbox you deleted is working as a part of a WikiEd Foundation class, and the profile should have been labeled this way. We are now at the end of the semester and the student is waiting for a grade. You are preventing that student from receiving that grade as you have deleted their work. Please restore and provide a justification for this decision.

In the future, I would appreciate you notifying me of your intentions to do things like this. Instructors are clearly noted as being connected to these pages so that things like this do not happen. A note on my talk page, at minimum, would be appreciated. I hope that you will make this a top priority, as your actions may have implications for the class. Best, -- Jaobar (talk) 03:05, 10 April 2019 (UTC) CC: User:Ian (Wiki Ed);User:Shalor (Wiki Ed)


 * Please read my first reply at below. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


 * pinged me about this because of my Wiki Education role. I looked at the deleted version of User:Leandramarie/sandbox, and it's not a G11 - it's simply an expansion of the existing Just Do It page. There are a few words in there that aren't quite encyclopaedic, but a few words don't make it a G11. The only problem I see is that it incorporates text from an existing article without proper attribution. But that's an easy-enough fix.
 * As an aside, could you take a closer look at some of 's G11 noms. They're well-meaning, but this is the second bad nom I've come across is the past day. — User:Ian (Wiki Ed)/Guettarda (talk) 13:00, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you both for your help restoring the sandbox. Best, -- Jaobar (talk) 16:17, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I checked six of Jebcubed's speedy tags. they were all valid. If you are concerned, stalk them yourself and revert speedies which you think are inappropriate. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Request for undeletion/G12
Hi, I'd like to ask you the undeletion of the Draft:Ruben Vergara Meersohn. I would like to edit the page according to your feedback and restore it. — Fcallagher (talk) 08:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * What is the point of my edit notice! There are now four consecutive threads on this page lacking wikilinks. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:28, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Apologies, I thought all the links listed in your edit notice were acceptable formats, now it should be edited in the appropriate format: Draft:Ruben Vergara Meersohn. — Fcallagher (talk) 11:10, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * One step at a time! Link fixed, next step: the page was deleted as copyvio so I cannot restore it, but read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:34, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the explanation, I followed the steps and my email should be connected. — Fcallagher (talk) 15:39, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Email sent. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

File:YoshiinYCW.png
Hi RHaworth. You deleted this file a little over a month ago. I'm wondering if it's similar in terms of licensing to File:Mega Rayquaza.png also uploaded by the same editor. The Mega Rayquaza file seems to be either a outright copyright violation or a WP:DERIVATIVE with the copyright on the original imagery held by the designer of Rayquaza or the company which owns the Pokemon franchise. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:18, 10 April 2019 (UTC) Thanks for clarifying this and also for taking a closer look at the other file. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * File:YoshiinYCW.png was patently a copyvio, from here among other places. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:29, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Stand for Courage Page Deletion
Hello RHaworth! You recently deleted the Stand For Courage Organization page due to A7. The organization has substantial media coverage as well as an upcoming film with nationwide release, so I believe it can meet the notability requirement. Can you provide me with some advice for reworking the artilcle? (I also know the article had major formatting issues, so this time I plan to start the new article in my sandbox. I didn't mean to start in the mainspace. I'm a bit rusty...) Thanks for your time! Queequeg22 (talk) 19:03, 10 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Iff you have no CoI, look at some of the articles in charities based in the United States and its sub-categories. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:58, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Abandoned draft: Michael R. Jackson
Hello, I'm trying to create my first article about Michael R. Jackson, a playwright and composer based in NYC. Wikipedia is suggesting I contact you because I'm unsure if I am re-creating a page you previously deleted. Here is the link that tells me you did the deletion Draft:Michael R. Jackson. Thanks in advance for any information you can give me about this article —Katyein (talk) 19:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I see that you have found it . — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:58, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Regarding deleted page of Rojin Shakya
Dear Sir, I don&rsquo;t know the reason why you deleted the page that i created under the name of rojin shakya i could have made modification if there was any mistakes. Since you are not from my area you may not know him. Please send me the copy of text. Or else enable a option for me to do the modification. His name has been mentioned in wikipedia several times. Thank you looking forward — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shakyarojin (talk • contribs) 04:34, 11 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Please read this and this and give me at least three links to the many mentions of him. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:58, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

deleted article
my name is nilkanth gaikwad. i want to know about deleted article please send me the text of deleted article i dont know what was the problem in my article please send me that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nilkanth Gaikwad (talk • contribs) 12:32, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:58, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Hii this nilkanth gaikwad I dont know why my content has been deleted so please provide my content if you thing it was not fulfilling the criteria for Wikipedia guideline i will not put it again just i want my article. please provide my content — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nilkanth Gaikwad (talk • contribs) 05:38, 13 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I get very annoyed when people ignore me. I told you to read this. To show that you did so please tell me what are the last four words of the message to which my read this link points. Since you are unlikely to become a Wikipedia editor, I do not demand that you comply with the instructions but I would still like to know that you read the message. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

WP:REFUND
Hey RH, can you please refund Portal:University of Wisconsin–Madison and Portal:University of Nebraska–Lincoln? The MfD actually closed with keeping both of those. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:05, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of CerberusOS Wiki article
I had add CerberusOS that is Custom ROM & I provided information for the project like other Custom ROM have for example Aospa, lineageOS, Viper OS etc. I would like you to reconsidered about the article we wasn't advertising any thing just provided information for our project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShantanuSingh555 (talk • contribs) 16:17, 11 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your project is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:21, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Still photography for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Still photography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Still photography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qono (talk) 17:37, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Useras/Les Useres
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Useras/Les Useres. Since you had some involvement with the Useras/Les Useres redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:40, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Deleted Draft:List of Ace of Diamond chapters
Hi! I was the one who created Draft:List of Ace of Diamond chapters, which was deleted by you shortly after I submitted it for review. I just want to ask why it has been deleted. Is the issue the summaries included in the page? If so, I got those summaries from Kodansha USA's page for the series and not from Amazon. I would just like to understand why it was deleted for copyright infringement. It was not my intention to do so. Hope you can elaborate on this to me so I can keep the reason in mind before redoing the draft and sending it again for review. Thank you very much! Perseushunt (talk) 22:43, 11 April 2019 (UTC) Thanks for the response! May I know if it would still be a violation if I cite where I got the summary from? Thanks! Perseushunt (talk) 21:58, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It does not matter whence you got it, it was still a solid lump of copyvio, eg. from this page. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:21, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, it certainly would. -- Orange Mike  &#124;  Talk  05:52, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Deleted:Doubles curling
Hi, you just deleted Doubles curling even though there was no copyright infringement and I pointed this out on the talk page. This is the website that the supposed copyrighted text came from:. If you look it says towards the bottom of the page, "Here is a simplified version at Wikipedia:" and then links to the Mixed curling article that Doubles curling was split from. Right below that line is the text that the Doubles curling article had that matched the website and was supposedly copyright infringement. How is this copyright infringement when they got the text from wikipedia and even cited the originating article? The article shouldn't have been deleted anyway since the alleged copyright infringing text was only a portion of the article and CSD says "where there is no non-infringing content on the page worth saving". Why was the article deleted? - A202985 (talk) 22:12, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I see it has been restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Fight the New Drug
Excuse me? I've never seen the deleted version of the article, so an article I wrote from scratch cannot be a repost of deleted content. This does not qualify under G4 speedy deletion. — feminist (talk) 09:33, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Fight the New Drug. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — feminist (talk) 13:38, 13 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I stick to the world of unambiguous keep/delete decisions. As soon as I see 8k bytes of discussion start up, I bow out and let others fight over it. I have given the nearly headless admin carte blanche. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Undeletion request
Hello, I am working for over four days on the hybrid blockchain draft that just got speedy deleted. I am researching different types of hybrid blockchains and have put that information about Polkadot there so I can continue writing on it in my own words. That entire article is being written by myself, except that little piece about Polkadot because I am not finished yet. This is very complex material and it takes a lot of time to make sure everything is accurate. I apologize for this mistake from my part, I was not aware I am in conflict while still working in draft. I do not understand why the entire draft got deleted instead of just that little part of a long piece of work. Please allow me to continue working on that draft. And I will not make the same mistake again. — JeffreyDutch (talk) 10:18, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * You have my full permission to continue working and I will try and remember if I see it in CAT:CSD, to leave it for someone else. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Disappearance of Brittanee Drexel
Just to let you know I'm recreating this page—deleted after an AfD eight years ago, and then deleted again by you in 2013 after a recreation. Not only is there more coverage in reliable sources, there have been continuing developments in the story with news coverage as recently as two months ago. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:21, 13 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Noted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Charlotte Townsend-Gault
Hi RHaworth, thanks for catching my errors. I am a new editor. I want to re-write the article, without the block quotations, and list of publications, as it appears that I was trying to work with something beyond my editing skill level. I see that I need some sort of permission to do so? Would you be able to advise how I seek that permission? Thanks. FourtyToo (talk) 19:36, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Please read this. You don't need any permissions! Just get down to it and write an article in your own words . — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

deletion of John Edmonds (artist)
Hi RHaworth,

I see you speedily deleted the page for John Edmonds (artist). I was unable to challenge the speedy deletion. I ran it through earwig copy vio and did not have an issue as it was under 50% from what I can remember. Since the page was speedily deleted, I was unable to confirm the copyright issues or lack there of. Is there a way for you to restore the page and for me to continue to work on the page to mitigate the copyvio issues you saw in it?

Thank you, --Wil540 art (talk) 23:06, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Why did u delete my page?
Why did u delete what i put?did i do something wrong?If so let me know and explain what i can do to fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:3051:1BD0:BD14:9E60:CC70:59B7 (talk) 02:19, 14 April 2019 (UTC)