User talk:RHaworth/2019 Jan 27

Emotional Speech Blocks Deletion Syndrome
[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Cardano pre review
Hello RHaworth, are you willing to pre review Draft:Cardano (cryptocurrency platform)? Do you think the article is now good enough to list at articles for creation? Cardano (platform) and the Ada cryptocurrency redirect was deleted. Some where saying it looked like an advertisement, so I tried to write it in a more neutral way.

My apologies for the recreation mess a few weeks ago. The article was deleted and I recreated it quickly. I didn't notice that User:David Gerard moved the article to draft, so when I saved my edit, the article was recreated again - and speedy deleted. Then User:ProgrammingGeek renamed and moved my personal sandbox live and that was moved (back) again to this current draft version. I like the renamed Cardano (cryptocurrency platform) better. Upto then I didn't know the Draft procedure existed. User:David_Gerard gave me some pointers on how to improve this article. That was and is much appreciated.

As stated on my User talk:FlippyFlink I am not paid or compensated to contribute to this article. I also was not asked to start this article. Information security and crypto are one of my favorite topics. So I created several related pages in the English Wikipedia and Dutch Wikipedia. Regards, -- FlippyFlink (talk) 11:25, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Ok. Thank you for your time. --FlippyFlink (talk) 09:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I do not get involved in draft reviewing. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyvio recreated
Hi RHaworth. Please note that User:Cattrina has recreated Draft:List of maze types and names--100.2.221.12 (talk) 17:09, 25 December 2018 (UTC)


 * New state does not seem to be a copyvio. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Binarization of consensus partition matrices
Dear RHaworth, you recently deleted this draft for unambiguous copyright infringement. It's my fault to cite part of an article directly to explain the result of a procedure done by myself. I will delete and rewrite this part of the draft and may I create a new draft? Thank you for your patience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zzhbest (talk • contribs) 12:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
 * So what is the connection between you and who created binarization of consensus partition matrices? Why do the arguments in the AfD discussion not apply equally to your version? You could re-submit but don't expect much joy. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Semyung University
Hi, I wanted to promote User:Md. Foysol Ahmed/sandbox this wiki page so that people can find out info about SMU. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Md. Foysol Ahmed (talk • contribs) 11:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Butting in to say that sounds like promotionalism which is not the purpose of Wikipedia. Looking.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 14:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
 * As this was copied right from the subject's web page, it is not suitable for Wikipedia in any event. Please see User:Dlohcierekim/g12 for more info.-- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 14:58, 27 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Please learn wikilinks and read this. Your piece was totally slovenly. I know an art tutor who recommends his students to view their subject through half-closed eyes. The same applies to Wikipedia articles: I view an article defocussed and see titles which are in bold and shouted . I look no further and zap it.
 * Your page claims "Semyung University is one of ten Flagship Korean National Universities". But list of national universities in South Korea lists ten flagship universities and yours is not one of them. If this contradiction can be explained, work through the articles to which that list points to learn what a Wikipedia article should look like and then write one about your establishment. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:38, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Your 8,294,235th Undelete-My-Article Request
Hi there! I saw you deleted my newly created page Draft:Targeted_Locus_Amplification due to copyright infringements. I work with the company that owns the website from which the source literature was found. Can the copy right therefore be lifted (with my permission) or can I still amend the page so that it complies with copyright regulations? Happy holidays and many thanks in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjekelder (talk • contribs) That is perfect, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjekelder (talk • contribs) 11:48, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
 * You could re-submit in your own words but it would be better if you would kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks this technique is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:38, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

PIP
Please reconsider speedy deletion of Partners in Performance (PIP). You deleted this citing 3 reason. Please reconsider: 1. The original article was dleeted in 2010. The firm has now reached a much higher level of notability. THe admin deleting in 2010 is no longer active on Wikipedia. 2. PIP is a firm with 400 people and offices around the world. COmpare with many other firms on list of management consulting firms PIP is more notable. It is regularly cited and its MD recently won 3rd most influential consultant in Australia, next to McKinsey and BCG 3. The article was properly cited and note written as an advertorial at all. Maybe it's a stub, but given you deleted so quickly there really wasn't a chance to develop it further. Thanks, New but motivated (talk) 05:42, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
 * New but motivated, you really do not deserve this. When I see a page called "Some Sort of Name (SSN)" the presence of the (SSN) bit usually indicates an ignorant, spam-only editor. So if your article ever gets accepted, it will be on a title of Partners in Performance and you may add a link to it in the Pip page.
 * You did not provide a link to the page you are discussing. You used external link format instead of wikilink. You do not know how to format a numbered list in wiki markup. 400 people does not automatically imply notability. The argument "deleted by an admin who is no longer active" is totally specious and you missed a very strong argument which could have easily inferred from the AfD discussion. The previous article was about "a non-profit organization founded with the monetary award that classical violinist Midori Goto received as part of the coveted Avery Fisher Prize in 2001". So, reluctantly, I have restored it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:35, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

Page deleted - why?
Hi, I am new to this wiki thing and I had thought I had done the right things on the wiki page Suplex Professional Wrestling I had created. I had been adjusting it as I go and waiting for it to get past draft state and then it gets deleted. Please explain why? Can it be restored? Thank you, ACJIJN (talk) 05:06, 30 December 2018 (UTC) ACJIJN


 * Kindly have the decency to wait until someone who does not shout and has no CoI thinks your organisation is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:28, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Bangladesh Honda Private Limited
Hello Mr. Roger, I am Mamshad, A 18 years old programmer from Dhaka, Bangladesh. I've recently created a page named Bangladesh Honda Private Limited, which was my first article on Wiki. This article has been deleted thrice I've created this and now it has been protected from editing.I have sent you and email about this and told me to discuss on this in Wiki. I Haven't created this page for any kind of advertisement or commercial promotions. I've created this page so that people all over world may know about this company and activities. But, I forgot to add the links. Is this the reason for my article's deletion ??? Can you please explain me the reasons, why my hard work of many hours is going to be in the dust ???? Can't it be restored ??? Yours Sincerely, Mamshad Shakir Islam User:Mamshad Shakir Islam (talk) 12:50 AM, 31 December 2018 (Bangladeshi Standard Time)


 * " I've created this page so that people all over world may know about this company and activities. " is by definition, advertising. Please see WP:PROMO. Please see User:Dlohcierekim/g11 for more info. Cheers, -- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 21:55, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I am surprised that people are reacting in this way to your article. I would have thought that a company gearing up to produce 100,000 vehicles per annum was inherently notable. To pick Jensen Motors as an example, this page says "just under 19,000 Jensen cars with the original Jensen badge were built" yet they warrant an extensive article. Clearly the total absence of independent references and the use of copyright material were fatal flaws in your version but I would have thought that a properly written article should succeed. Possibly you could solicit support at WikiProject Bangladesh. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:28, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I call your action newbie-biting. Mamshad Shakir Islam is a teenager and does not appear to have a CoI. Surely draftspace is where people can convert a spammy article into a proper one? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:24, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * More than one article/draft with this title have appeared by more than one author but with the commonality of using copy/paste from the subject's webpage. I do not see the biteyness of referring new editors to WP:PROMO or User:Dlohcierekim/g11 to educate them as to how to avoid creating G11 pages. And we do not keep G11/G12 in draft space, regardless of the lack of experience of the editor. My g11 page in fact encourages new users to try again using RS and a non promotional tone. I also note that you are one of the admins who deleted one iteration as spam. -- Dloh cier ekim  (talk) 18:13, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * How is tagging a copyvio for deletion bitey?? Praxidicae (talk) 15:53, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
 * OK, copyvios are always grounds for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:27, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Ad?
You might take a look at the User:Gaztrorio page in the context of the now deleted Surf2Ship.com and consider whether the user page constitutes an advert or not. Oh. And further context provided by this diff, which seems to spell "not here" (and which I'll revert). HNY. --Tagishsimon (talk) 11:19, 31 December 2018 (UTC)


 * I looked and acted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:24, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

VocApp
Good afternoon, I would like to know why my article on VocApp was deleted. I based it on the article about Duolingo, which is quite a similar app to VocApp. In my opinion, VocApp article was as much informative as the one about duolingo. Also, regarding the company's website as the source - can something be more informative than factual information on the website? No blog or newspaper can be more accurate on the content of a given subject than the subject itself. I would like to hear which exact part of the text I wrote was promotional. Best wishes and have a happy new year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaciekKubiak (talk • contribs)
 * I happen to be interested in gaining a smattering of a new language at the moment so I downloaded your app. My Android machine is a 10 inch tablet which I use in landscape mode but your app insists that I tilt my head 90&deg; to view it. Nul points for app!


 * Kindly have the decency to wait until someone who has no CoI thinks your app is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:24, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Officers
Please undo the delete of Draft: Kirk B. Stabler, as the article did not have any copyright violations. All of the information was public domain information from the US government. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiFixur (talk • contribs) 13:55, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Please undo the delete of Draft:Robert A. Hoffmann, as the article did not have any copyright violations. All of the information was public domain information from the US government. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiFixur (talk • contribs) 13:55, 31 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Deletion is now being appealed at WP:REFUND. Isn't this a work of ths US government? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:45, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

EdJohnston (talk), yes, this is a work of the US government, which is why I submitted a request for undeletion. — WikiFixur (talk) 20:14, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

RHaworth (talk), I hope this helps. I provided a link to the licensing disclaimer from the bottom of the site, which states "AF.mil is considered public information". -- WikiFixur (talk) 20:39, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * WikiFixur, article titles should be bracketed with not "". You do not ping me on this page. But you do seem to have learned to sign your messages. The two articles have now been restored but I would still like to hear a definitive answer to my question "is stuff in .mil automatically PD". The disclaimer is hopelessly vague - has nobody in the US military ever heard the word copyright? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:24, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

User talk:Alisoofastaei
Can you undelete this? It contains useful warnings and notices for future reference. — CoolSkittle  (talk) 22:24, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

I see. Thank you for undeleting. — CoolSkittle  (talk) 21:51, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Oops, sorry. See this for explanation. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:27, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Page deletion
Hi RHaworth. I've seen you deleted the page I added: draft:Contis Group Limited. I understand it was judged to be too promotional, which I think is because the reference links either weren't numerous or reputable enough. I want to try again, but this time with many more high-authority references, which will prove the noteworthiness of the company. The deletion note said to speak to you first, so I just want to do that and check if you have any thoughts? I also want to see if there's any way I can get the copy back? No problem if not. And just to be totally clear - I have absolutely no interest in creating a promotional page. I want this to be a proper, impartial reference article. So any assistance you can provide in that regard is of course greatly appreciated :) — Tedwards86 (talk) 14:51, 2 January 2019 (UTC)


 * It is a waste of time accepting paid editing commissions from non-notable companies. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:27, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Commissioner-oneill2.png
Could you explain why you declined the speedy deletion on File:Commissioner-oneill2.png? The provided link for the permission makes no mention of a creative commons license that I an find nd in fact, the link specifically states "The City respects the intellectual property of others and it asks its users to do the same. Service marks and trademarks contained in or displayed on NYC.gov, and the contents of linked sites operated by third parties, are the property of their respective owners (which may be the City). All other design, information, text, graphics, images, pages, interfaces, links, software, and other items and materials contained in or displayed on NYC.gov, and the selection and arrangements thereof, are the property of the City of New York. All rights are reserved.". -- Whpq (talk) 22:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Admins can never win! At above I am being told off for deleting images created by the US military. Now you are telling me off for declining to delete! OK, possibly it is too simplistic to say anything in the .gov TLD is publick domain. Feel free to re-apply the speedy tag. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:27, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

draft deleted
Good Morning Ms. Haworth, I'm afraid I have to ask you why the draft about the topic Federico Albanese was deleted. The biography you're referring to as a copyright infringiment ( http://www.arttourist.com/jazz/labels/neue-meister/federico-albanese.html ) has been actually copied from the the original biography of Federico which appears on his own website (https://www.federicoalbanese.com/about) and written by Albanese himself and his management, which is also related to this other biography ( http://www.schneiderplus.com/en/artists/a-new-artist-template/biografie.html ), Schneider Plus is Federico Albanese's Management. I hope it could be restored and re-reviewed. Many Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredogomez2018 (talk • contribs) 12:17, 3 January 2019 (UTC)


 * (talk page stalker) @Fredogomez2018: I just took a look at the federicoalbanese.com website. There is no copyright statement whatsoever at the website; under Wikipedia policies, we treat that as an implicit statement of an all-rights-reserved license. Unless that website contains a statement that the material—or at least the biography text—is under a free license like a Creative Commons license that allows for derivative and commercial reuse, we have to treat reuse of the text on Wikipedia as copyright infringement. —C.Fred (talk) 12:38, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

@C.Fred There is a "© 2019 Federico Albanese" on the bottom of each page of the website. The bio was written by Federico Albanese himself. So it is definitely an official one which can be used anywhere officially and freely, we've add a creative commons license on the bottom of the biography. many thanks and I hope it can be re-reviewed and restored. If there is anything else which is wrong or unclear we're happy to keep editing until it meets all the criteria. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredogomez2018 (talk • contribs) 12:17, 3 January 2019 (UTC)


 * What does omonymous mean? What is your relationship to and ? This page does have a CC licence at the bottom but the ND clause makes it incompatible with Wikipedia. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks this guy is notable and writes about him here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:27, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Understood,many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.174.47.17 (talk • contribs)

I Believe in Science
I approved this out of AFC after reviewing newspaper sources in Arabic, which was a huge pain in my ass. It certainly was not a speedy deletion candidate. Can you restore (and its talk page) for any future needed deletion processes?--Milowent • hasspoken 13:40, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:27, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Deleted Hugh Charles Welsh
Hello, I recently began to create a page for Hugh Charles Welsh and I was flagged for having a phrase that violated copy write rules. I thought I had properly cited the source, but as I am new to editing and creating pages, I must have not done it correctly. In order to correct this mistake I immediately removed the phrase that was said to be copied. However, shortly after that I discovered that my entire draft had been deleted.

With this in mind, I was wondering if there was anyway to get back all of the work that I had done. I had spent hours creating that page and researching all the information I needed to include (Hugh Welsh is my boss and I was actually working on a project for him). When I try to go back to the sandbox mode I now see that all the content I had created is now blank. Is there anyway that I can get this information back (not to be published but just so I can further edit it in order to be in accordance with the rules)?

I apologize for the confusion but I simply do not understand why all of my work was deleted because of one mistake - like I mentioned previously, I am new to this and any additional clarification on the guidelines would be appreciated as well. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattsepe (talk • contribs) 00:22, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The word is copyright. Learn to use the "show preview" button - there is no need to save every few keystrokes. Restored and cleaned up but the article stands zero chance at the moment because there are no independent references. It still reads like a CV rather than an encyclopedia article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:55, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Edit: Thank you - I will make sure to be more careful going forward and will add the correct citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattsepe (talk • contribs) 15:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Deleted Page: Emotions Unplugged
Hi RHaworth, This is Vishal from India. Recently I created a Wikipedia page for the book, Emotions Unplugged. I was under the impression that we need references for everything we write and a Wikipedia page is deleted if we write information for which the reference is not available. With this notion, I created the page taking much information from one of the sources. However, I understand that I'm violating the content published by one of the references. Hence, I've rewritten the content. Can you please guide me in re-creating the page? Looking forward to your help and support. Thanks & Best Regards, Vishal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishalanand07 (talk • contribs) 20:15, 4 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Kindly have the decency to wait until someone who has no CoI thinks your book is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:56, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

What on earth is an ayacut?
You closed this AfD discussion with no explanation after it had been open for only 12 minutes, with no input to the discussion beyond the nominator. This appears to be out of process. Would you care to explain? -- Michig (talk) 09:33, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I should have given better info. on the AfD closure. I will give user:Daiyusha the benefit of the doubt and say that when he saw the page it did not have the speedy tag saying "copyvio from here". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:56, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, 2 of my AfD nominations happened to have CSD also, one of them had a CSD put up while I was writing the AfD details in Twinkle, and the other had CSD tag removed by the creator. I believe the article in question is one of the two. My AfDs were mistimed, should have monitored the history. — Daiyusha (talk) 16:37, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Sports broadcasting
The page for sports broadcasting rights in India was deleted by you in 2017. May I know what the reason was. I am unable to find any details on the reason for its deletion, nor the type of content that was in that article. However, since there are such pages for a lot of other countries, I do not see a reason for its deletion. I am planning to recreate the page but would like to know the reasons for its deletion so I can avoid the mistakes that were made and forced you to delete it. — Ruppanbabu (talk) 19:00, 5 January 2019 (UTC)Ruppanbabu


 * No reason! I can see eight reasons! Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:22, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Brian Kachejian Wikipedia page
Hello Thank you for looking over my Wikipedia page. I have addressed the issues of notability that you left as the reason for possible deletion of my page. The issues were addressed according to Wikipedia guidelines. I have left more info on my talk page. I hope you find my corrections satisfactory and I thank you for your help. Please let me know if I need to make any further corrections. (Brian Kachejian) (BrianKachejian (talk) 19:51, 5 January 2019 (UTC))
 * "Award-winning always signals to me "non-notable". I am asking for other people's opinions as to whether you have satisfactorily addressed the issues of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:22, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Old sandbox article revival
Dear Mr. Haworth, As a fellow grumpy old man, I would like to be sure I follow correct procedure. I started this sandbox some years ago for my father Peregrine Fellowes. I failed to take it further than a title and I see you deleted it some time ago, as "stale" (which it definitely was!).

I plan to get the thing done this year, in fact, starting today I am assembling my notes. I will write as much as possible offline for my next attempt to publish a page on this man's intriguing career, that you may accept that I will have a complete page done within a short time (I have yet to figure out the protocols, creating the boxes and uploading a picture and so on).

On this basis, would you allow the title to be revived, assuming I apply with the work done as described? In fact, I'm not sure if I have registered a final title, but I hope it can be "Peregrine Fellowes". Among other things, Perry Fellowes was the father of Julian Fellowes, my brother, also known as The Lord Fellowes these days, Oscar winner, Downton Abbey etc. etc.

I have logged in for this talk page, and I expect you have my email, but just in case, it is. I look forward to hearing from you. Yours sincerely, Rory Fellowes (talk) 12:25, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Replied at draft talk:Peregrine Fellowes. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:12, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

LlanfairPG
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch railway station. Since you had some involvement with the Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch railway station redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Another at RfD
An editor has asked for a discussion to address this redirect. Since you had some involvement with the redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:28, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Reassemblage (album)
Hello there. The article for Reassemblage (album) was speedy deleted by you last month because there was not an article for the duo behind the album, Visible Cloaks. I have since made the article for the duo. However, I did not create the article for the Reassemblage album, nor do I ever remember contributing to it. The creator of the article was EditorE, who has been banned indefinitely. I am not asking on behalf of that user to restore the article - we've never met - but I feel it was a great piece of work and if the only issue for its deletion has been addressed now I was wondering if it could be restored? The business of deleting and restoring articles is mostly uncharted territory for me so sorry if it's not my business to ask, but thanks anyway. -- TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 15:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:12, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

User talk:Knanayaca
You may wish to revoke talk page access. -- Cahk (talk) 08:23, 10 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:12, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Please restore film2pro draft article
Hello RHaworth, my name is Filippo Piscopo, I'm new to Wikipedia and I am the author of a draft of an article on my film "It will Be Chaos" on the European refugee crisis that was deleted from my sandbox a couple of hours ago. I have not created this page for any kind of advertisement or commercial promotion. I've created this page so that people worldwide may learn about the film and the related refugee crisis topic thanks to the outstanding Wikipedia application. I understand that you saw the reference to HBO but, again, the article is not on HBO or a TV broadcaster but about a film. Can you please restore it so that I can keep working on it and submit it for review? I've put a lot of work in it ... I also have re-read the guidelines on how to write a Wiki article and I have several edits in mind to conform my article to the Wikipedia style. Thank you very much for your understanding. Best Regards Film2pro (talk) 17:57, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
 * So who are the "we" who are using your account - how many people? Kindly have the decency to wait until someone who has no CoI thinks your movie is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:12, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Deleted page
Greetings, the page Draft:Christ Church of Clarkson was deleted before I could correct the issues involved, namely, the use of an article that I wrote on the [rocwiki] page. Do I understand this to mean that the article that I spent many hours on is now gone for good or can it be restored so that I may correct it? Thanks, Tony — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theologicae (talk • contribs) 17:57, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Learn to create proper links. Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:46, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Vision and the Scarlet Witch
Hi, there. I see that you acted upon my speedy deletion request to the Draft:The Vision and Scarlet Witch page, but you merged the history of that original page in with the proper page Draft:Vision and the Scarlet Witch. That was not my request, as I requested that the original page, Draft:The Vision and Scarlet Witch, to be deleted and for the proper page, Draft:Vision and the Scarlet Witch, to be renamed to the new title, Draft:The Vision and Scarlet Witch. Merging the history of the two pages was not my request, so I'd like it if you could please remove the improper history from the page, being from version 08:01, January 10, 2019‎ Robberey1705 to version 09:11, January 12, 2019‎ Trailblazer101. Thanks, Trailblazer101 (talk) 18:32, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The edits by Robberey1705 have just as much right to exist as yours. If you wish to pursue this matter, try WP:AN. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:46, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

POV pushing par-excellence
Hi RHaworth, on Wednesday you suddenly deleted my article BBC investigation into pre-pubescent rape evidence failures about the extremely serious and newsworthy topic of very young children who were raped being woefully failed by forensic investigators. Please clarify whether you believe my new draft of this article is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. If you don't respond, I will assume you are satisfied with it. Tots & little ones matter! (talk) 18:52, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

The article, which is about the extremely serious and newsworthy topic of how very young children who were raped were then woefully failed by investigators, has no more than a few direct quotes spoken by named individuals in quotation marks and only a very small limited number of reused phrases such as "independently reviews forensic evidence for defence and prosecution cases", which were difficult to rewrite without losing or significantly distorting their meaning. These reused phrases may be permissible under WP:LIMITED. The criterion WP:G12 is absolutely crystal clear that "for equivocal cases that do not meet speedy deletion criteria (such as ... close paraphrasing), the article or the appropriate section should be blanked with {{subst:Copyvio}}" and not speedily deleted.

Your reaction of obliterating the article's information as fast as possible was way over the top. Tots & little ones matter! (talk) 21:39, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Please also see WP:RGW; if it does not apply now, almost certainly will in the near future. Cheers, ——   SerialNumber  54129  21:43, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Have some more wikijargon: you are blatant POV pusher. Wikipedia is neither a soapbox nor is it news. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:46, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Traumatic experience
Where is deleted page multigenerational legacies of trauma so I can insert parts of it in the page you indicated? Sincerely -- SvenAERTS (talk) 20:24, 12 January 2019 (UTC)


 * You bracket an article title with not "". Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:46, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Definitely lost
hi there - if i edit the notes provided will that be ok? trying to get my first post published so keen to get this one right. cheers for your help  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paradise lost 90 (talk • contribs) 18:07, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I have no idea what you are talking about. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:46, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

4th Wish 107.5 Music Awards
Hi, I saw that you deleted the page 4th Wish 107.5 Music Awards. I'm wondering of you could kindly undelete it so I can provide more references? Thank you! elivic (talk) 19:57, 14 January 2019 (UTC) Hi RHaworth, the nominees do not pay anything in order to win any award in the event. Instead, the event gives money to charitable institutions picked by the award winners themselves. This is a public service charity event, not a commercial pay-to-win one. The fans and selected judges vote whoever they think deserve to be the winners. I apologize for this because most third party Filipino media usually do not post anything before the event, and they only provide news about the results. I would like to emphasize that this event is the only music awards in the Philippines (maybe the only one in the world as well) that donates money to charities, which are picked by the winners. The advocacy of the founder made it unique through public service. Thinking and jumping to conclusions that the awards event is a "classic vanity award mill" without checking sources is not what I expected on this site. Also, I would like to get the text for the deleted page 4th Wish 107.5 Music Awards. Thank you in advance! elivic (talk) 15:42, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I looked at the long list of categories and thought "looks like a classic vanity award mill". I am willing to let you have your text - read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:33, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:17, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Deleted page DNMO
Hi, I noticed you recently deleted my Wikipedia page DNMO (see below for previous existing link). I'm not extremely knowledgable on the wiki-world so I'm just confused as to why you did this? A fan of mine created the page and was working on listing all the significant links and information on my project. He was keeping me up to date with it and was very interesting to watch from aside. I'd very much appreciate if you could restore the page. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:241:8E00:79E0:6C:8258:9E49:FD1 (talk) 23:54, 15 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Search this page for places where I have used the word "kindly"! Wikipedia is neither FaceSpace nor MyBook nor Wikia. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:20, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

red eye cocktail
Thanks for the delete. — Nomad5515 (talk) 10:45, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Deleted Page: Rights of Future Generations
Could I please have the text of the deleted page draft:rights of future generations so that it can be edited offline to meet guidelines for future re-submission. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by EMJones333 (talk • contribs) 10:48, 16 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Learn wikilinks. Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:20, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

West-Eastern Divan Orchestra
Hello RHaworth, re: my submission. I do not insist on having my submission published. Just to explain why I created the list of performances by the West-Eastern Divan Orchestra in the first place: The thought behind it - a list of concerts that this particular orchestra has played all over the world - is that this is not an ordinary list of concert gigs. Whereas one might ask why the notion that every single set of Rolling Stones tour dates must be available on Wikipedia contributes to our deeper understanding of that band's history or being, the mere fact that this Jewish-Arabian classical music project continues to exist is in itself something that cannot be taken for granted. In this regard, the list of the WEDO's past concerts (including one in Ramallah) constitutes an important empirical factor in establishing the notion that the project is something extraordinary and worth writing about. Not the single concert matters but the body of appearances on aggregate, simply because it defies all kinds of logic. But as I said, I do not insist. It was just a thought that this might be of relevance. Best regards, Jacqueshobbes (talk) 12:36, 16 January 2019 (UTC) Wed 16 January 2019 13:33 (European Standard Time)


 * Jacques, I saw Barenboim saying sadly "I am alone in this now". I can assure him that he is not alone: the EAPPI is something that I seriously considered serving on. But as far as your list goes, sadly it is listcruft. The layout of the same list on the orchestra'a website is ridiculous - massive amounts of waste space. I suggest you contact the orchestra and offer to re-do the list in a sensible format. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:20, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, okay, I get it. Jacqueshobbes (talk) 08:39, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Deleted Draft:James Hird
I think that you made a mistake in deleting Draft:James Hird. If you were right, please explain. I created the draft yesterday when moving abandoned drafts from user space to draft space. The user page had been an old draft, and, after it was created, an article was created on James Hird. I marked the draft saying that it should be left to allow comparison against the article to see if there was any information in the draft to add to the article, and that it could be then deleted in six months as G13. An IP then seemed to be following up on my work tagged the draft as A10. In reading over the criteria for A10 again, it appears first that it should only be applied to articles and not drafts, and, second, that the guidelines say that it should be used sparingly, because normally redirects are preferred. I tried contesting the speedy deletion tagging, but I think that administrators commonly ignore the contesting of speedy deletion tags because the objection is on the talk page. So is there an alternate way to contest a deletion? I couldn't remove the tag, because I had created the page. So can you explain why you deleted the draft? I realize that this is not all that important when there is an article, but if I don't understand what the actual guidelines are for speedy deletion, I would like an explanation. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:35, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Restored. If that IP address gives you any more trouble, let me know and I will block it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:20, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

NoddyBuck
Please revoke talkpage access for user:NoddyBuck. They are a sock trying to bother other users. &mdash; CLCStudent (talk) 21:13, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Cack-handedness
NYC2019, you have repeatedly removed the above message about NoddyBuck. If you can re-instate your message without repeating that mistake (and preferably in less than fourteen edits!) I will reply to you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:07, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Sorry I am new here, I will try. — NYC2019 (talk) 20:11, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft deleted draft:Jessica Clements
You deleted the draft:Jessica Clements because of copyright infringements. But a few minutes before you deleted it I made changes and wrote it myself, so there should not be any copyright infringements. I think it was deleted too quickly.. Can you fix it please? — NYC2019 (talk) 20:14, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * RHaworth - Just responding to this message to let you know that this user had messaged me about this on my user talk page asking for assistance. I've evaluated all revisions of the draft page, and found the user's latest creation of the page to have resolved the issues and were no longer in violation of copyright (compared to the first two creation attempts that clearly did violate copyright policy). Hence, I restored the draft that was deleted per G12. If you disagree with this decision and if issues are still present on the draft that violate copyright, please let me know as soon as possible. Thanks :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   21:08, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * NYC2019, you shot yourself in the foot when you re-created draft:Jessica Clements - you left in place the speedy delete tag from the previous version! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:17, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Tea Queens
Please restore this page. It is an important school project and is not intented as a hoax. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Okpeletier (talk • contribs) 00:30, 20 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Please get your teacher to give here their justification for allowing, or even encouraging, you to submit fiction to Wikipedia. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Amigo Loans
Hey, you deleted and prevented any further recreation of the article Amigo Loans in 2014, apparently because it was written as an advertisement. The company has since IPO'd and is a FTSE 250 listed company. Plus it has had a lot of mainstream media coverage for its loan shark practices1. Someone has created the article at Amigo Holdings but that is technically the parent holding company which is not as notable as the business itself. I think Amigo Holdings should be moved to Amigo Loans but can't do so because of the article creation protection - could you take a look? — Little Professor (talk) 20:43, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Amigo Loans is an easy pass for WP:N (even in 2014) and I can see nothing in the AfD to justify salting like this. Nor any reason why a blatant advert should be a reason for salting – that needs a better and more balanced article, not the prevention of one. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:58, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Unsalted. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Please restore "City Express Money Transfer"
This page is about Nepal's one of the fastest growing remittance company. There is a page about "IME- International Money Express", so why not about City Express Money Transfer after all both of them are competitors. Why are you deleting all of my articles whatever it be. Okay, I admit I am new to wikipedia. However, I have followed the guidelines. In case, I missed something, you couldn't have taught me to remove/ change or edit the things that are not okay. Please guide me brother. I need to get this article live. Please help me, please!!! Please restore my page and instruct me what to do next. My job is on the line, brother. I have kids to feed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Your suraj (talk • contribs) 03:47, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * You bracket an article title with not "". I see you have recreated it in draft space. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Utente:Marialaura Popolizio01/sandbox
Hi, You moved Utente:Marialaura Popolizio01/sandbox to User:Marialaura Popolizio01/sandbox. I'd question that since the page was created by and  has only ever edited once on itwiki - it:Progetto:Coordinamento/Scuole/Liceo Cagnazzi Altamura. Given that created 3 or 4 such Utente pages today I wonder if there's a problem with the outreach dashboard? I'll move the sandbox in question to User:Luigi Catalani/sandbox. Regards, Cabayi (talk) 21:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)


 * I have no objections. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Exaro
It would seem that the entire (more or less) setup and modus operandi of Exaro News were based on Libel, full stop. Would you recommend wp:RevDel on the article (and Talk:Exaro) and their URL put on WP:Edit filter here on Wikipedia, because I certainly would... -- 194.207.146.167 (talk) 16:06, 22 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

I want to create page vfairs
You have deleted my article, i want to create it again with taking care of the wiki guidelines. please undelete that page so i can remove all promotional things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farhankhalid87 (talk • contribs)


 * I see that you have been blocked. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Image Deletion
Hi Roger, I recently uploaded a front cover image of a magazine I used to be the publisher of - Windows NTexplorer magazine. It was deleted/removed due to an "Unambiguous copyright infringement". Could you help me understand what (c) I need to supply or detail - I was the publisher of the magazine and the ISSN/Copyright was to me. Many thx, Jason — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utahsaint (talk • contribs) 02:30, 24 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Learn wikilinks! As well as link to the article, you needed to link to the image as well. I doubt whether you personally hold the copyright but don't bother trying to prove it. Just upload a much smaller version and give it a fair use declaration. Category:fair use magazine covers points you to thousands of examples. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Thx for the reply roger. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utahsaint (talk • contribs) 02:04, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Standardy kvality sociálních služeb
Hello, please, can you send me the text of my deleted article Standardy kvality sociálních služeb? Thank you Petra Procházková — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prochazkovp (talk • contribs) 16:08, 24 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Learn wikilinks! So how did you expect me to send you the text since you have not set up a usable email address? Please reply. Copied to cz:Wikipedista:Prochazkovp/Pískoviště. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:51, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

User:ZAMBO YOUTH
Why did you delete this as promotional? Looks like a good-faith attempt to write an article about a town to me ... Black Kite (talk) 10:58, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks :) Black Kite (talk) 17:09, 25 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Black Kite, it was only when I had finished my restore to Zambo, Ghana and edits that I realised that all I had been doing was put back the wiki markup that Zambo Youth had removed by copying Eremon the wrong way. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

SILS
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect SILS™ Procedure. Since you had some involvement with the SILS™ Procedure redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:15, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

More &trade;s
Hello, could you please reopen Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 25? It hasn't been open long enough for me to have a chance to comment and I fail to see what speedy deletion criterion they fall under (especially since you neglected to specify). Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 15:36, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of Draft:Lafiosa Enterprise
Hello, I have contested the deletion of Draft:Lafiosa Enterprise based on the important note that appears through the article wizard when creating draft articles. Kindly recreate the draft please so I can continue improving it. — Christopher Odhiambo (talk) 22:42, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * , your draft was deleted for being unambiguous advertising or promotion. I don't see how that note you have provided applies. — CoolSkittle  (talk) 23:32, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Thanks for getting back. My worry is it states that there is no deadline for editing a draft. If it is unambiguous advertising or promotion, I have upto six months to edit it and make it right. Come on. By the way let me ask, to whom am I advertising or doing the promotion? This is an article that is not online, cannot be searched and found anywhere. And by the way, what is a draft? Simple English, A work i progress. Come on, let us enjoy what we do best, writing. No I have taken this in bad faith. — Christopher Odhiambo (talk) 23:43, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
 * , if a page meets one of the criteria for speedy deletion (of which advertising/promotion is criterion WP:G11), the deadline doesn't apply, and the draft may be deleted immediately. I don't know about the content of the draft though, so I'll leave it up to RHaworth to reply further. — CoolSkittle  (talk) 23:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, will be waiting for an inspirational discussion with. But I think experienced people like you then should go and edit the page that has the important note that I presented, because now I guess it is confusing. And how do I open this topic for discussion? Kindly help me do this before you go. — Christopher Odhiambo (talk) 23:53, 26 January 2019 (UTC)


 * I really do no know why I have done this! You are probably a sock puppet of Goest Ryder, have an undeclared CoI and have had the article deleted on three other titles. But I have restored it. I request Randykitty to give you a chance to make it non-spammy. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)