User talk:RITWIK MAHATA

Welcome
Hello RITWIK MAHATA and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Kurmali language, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ; this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! MaxA-Matrix&#128172; talk 14:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks MaxA-Matrix,I have found my fault in my contributions to Kurmali language through corresponding mail from Wikipedia. RITWIK MAHATA (talk) 14:45, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Copy edit
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Inertial_frame_of_reference, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

This was not a good edit. I have reverted it. Apart from the bad punctuation, it is not the set that describes, but the frames that each describe. Plural. - DVdm (talk) 09:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greater Jharkhand (July 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Greater Jharkhand and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Greater_Jharkhand Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Greater_Jharkhand reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:20, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Unsourced edits
Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kudmi Mahato, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for guiding.  Ritwik Mahata t@lk 18:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Please check my recent comment on this talk page regarding this @Ohnoitsjamie
 * @RITWIK MAHATAis deleting sourced citations to push his/her own narrative.
 * A user had provided 3 studies including census which essentially mentions Kudmi Mahatos as doubtlessly Hindus. In the recent study it is established that 99.8% of them practice Hinduism.
 * included this stating "The primary religion of the Kudmi Mahatos is Hinduism" with 3 reliable citations and he quickly deleted and changed it to "The Kudmi Mahatos demand Sarna" as if it's any helpful and explanatory to what beliefs and customs they follow.
 * If there's a religion category then it should be mentioned what religion the community follows. Not something like "they demand X". Even if they demand X it should be included that what religion they follow.
 * As far as I follow the demand of Sarna is a politicised move and not something inherently from the Kudmi society. Thus this page is exploited to gain political interests and to subvert the public from the actual truth by censoring information and including hypothesis.
 * Even previously many users had complained in the Talk Page against the vandalism of @RITWIK MAHATA
 * He reverts any edit which does not suit his political interests. Please look into this matter and help us. Austin-Crix (talk) 07:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Help request
In any page after clicking "comparison between selected revisions" (in log in situation) I see the comparision instantly in source mode only and then it disappear but I can see the comparison between latest two revision (in log out situation) in source mode only. Ritwik Mahata t@lk 14:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * You'll probably have to describe the problem you are seeing in more detail. Is "source mode only" relevant to something? If you see a difference in behavior between what you see when logged in and when not logged in, it could possibly be a userscript that you installed - but I don't see that you have installed any userscripts.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 16:54, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but what you posted on my talk page (you should have responded here) does not clarify anything at all.
 * It seems you are complaining about an apparent change in behavior; something that used to work and no longer does. Can you say how long ago this problem first appeared?
 * It also seems that you can see the behavior you expect when you are not logged in, but if you are logged in something appears only for a moment and is then possibly replaced by something else. One thing this may relate to is what you have chosen in your Preferences for your "skin" - the default skin, the one that is shown to users not logged in - was changed some months ago and it has far-ranging differences, many of which experienced users have refused by setting their skin preference back to something like "Vector legacy".
 * The only place that I know of where "comparison between selected revisions" is shown is in an article's revision history. Or are you seeing this button somewhere else?
 * You keep mentioning "source mode only", so I'm wondering if there is some user interface conflict happening when you are normally in visual editor mode. Have you set a preference on your Preferences|Editing page for "Editing mode:"?
 * After the display you were asking for appears and disappears, what remains? Does the window close? Are you left back looking at the revision history page?
 * I realize this level of detail I am asking about may seem frustrating to you, but few people complain about something like this. Answers to these questions may help figure out if there is a general problem or if there is something specific to your situation that is causing it.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 19:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Greater Jharkhand
Hello, RITWIK MAHATA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Greater Jharkhand, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:05, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Greater Jharkhand


Hello, RITWIK MAHATA. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Greater Jharkhand".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Vandalism
I am noticing that all your edits on the Kudmi Mahato community have been biased and you intentionally vandalise and include false information in the page as well as delete evidential citations.

Someone had recently sourced 3 citations for the primary religion of Kudmi Mahatos and it's mentioned Hinduism. You are trying to politicize and propagandize narratives and included "Kudmis demand Sarna".

Nowhere the category speaks about what the community demands, it speaks about what religion they follow which is Hinduism.

Being a Kudmi Mahato myself, I know what inferior tactics you are using to get registed as an ST tribe by exploiting wikipedia. Revert back the edits or I have to complain about it to the staff. Austin-Crix (talk) 07:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for guiding Ritwik Mahata t@lk 15:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)