User talk:RJFJR/Archive4

Archives

 * Archive for November 28, 2004 through June 17, 2006 now at User talk:RJFJR/Archive1
 * Archive for June 17, 2006 through October 24, 2006 now at User talk:RJFJR/Archive2
 * Archive for October 25, 2006 through 16:00, 24 September 2008 (UTC) now at User talk:RJFJR/Archive3

Re: technical status
The wikitech-l mailing list is normally the best place to look for such updates. From what I remember of it, they needed new disks in order to do the dumps, and the new disks arrived but there was something wrong with them, and so they're waiting on a new set of new disks. You're likely to get a better answer either by asking on that mailing list, or over IRC in irc://irc.freenode.net/wikimedia-tech, than from my memory; those are the right places to ask. --ais523 18:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Baruch HaBa Melech HaMashiach
Hello, ברוך הבא מלך המשיח

שהחיינו וקיימנו והגיענו לזמן הזה Could you tell me please if this song is from Avraham Fried or someone else? And on wich album does it appears? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djampa (talk • contribs) 08:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

thank you

Djampa (talk) 08:03, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I did a google on "Baruch HaBa Melech HaMashiach" (including quotes for exact match) and it found a few hits, including . I can't say whether this is authoritative but it may point you in the correct direction.  You may want to ask at the Reference desk, possibly as language, humanities, or miscellaneous. RJFJR (talk) 15:13, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for your welcome message. I would send you a private message but I dont know if it exists among wikipedians, therefore feel free to delete this message Enisbayramoglu (talk) 10:51, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Here here! JohnXCitizen (talk) 02:52, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Cleanup Task Force
I recently saw that the Cleanup Taskforce was given the historical tag. As a former member and someone who really appreciated the contributions of the group...

ZnCdS
Thanks for filling in the red link at zinc cadmium sulfide. :-) --IvoShandor (talk) 18:11, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!


 Marlith  (Talk)  has given you a kitten! Gifts of kittens promote Wikilove and holiday spirt. Hopefully this one has made your day better. Share the WikiLove and civility with everyone and raise the holiday spirit! Send kittens to others by adding {{subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.  Marlith  (Talk)  04:23, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi!
Thanks for the greetings. Brazilian user here. Best wishes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frajolex (talk • contribs) 11:59, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Help!
Please see this discussion Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games

There is an ongoing issue with Kung Fu Man over an edit dispute which is getting out of hand, and I'm fairly certain the user is relying on sockpuppets to make revisions to the article. Check the revision history yourself to verify this. Also, I've been receiving harassing comments and threats from this user and am not sure where to turn for help. Please get involved and try to act as the voice of reason. Thank you. 74.242.123.2 (talk) 01:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Deflation is a contraction in the volume of money and credit relative to available goods and services.
I strongly oppose the removal of items from article without discussing it first. If I revert the item removed without discussing it, then I will be blocked for "edit warring" and for being a "disruptive editor." The person who removed the item does not get blocked for "edit warring." The person removing the statement without discussing it first, is not labelled a "disruptive editor".

So, let´s discuss this matter. I think the statement: "Deflation is a contraction in the volume of money and credit relative to available goods and services." should stay in the lead since it accurately defines what deflation is.

Discussion regarding all the above matters invited.

PennySeven (talk) 17:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

I am not the original author of the statement.

PennySeven (talk) 17:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Ideally various editors should partake in the discussion and not just two. I state again, RJFJR, who agrees with you to remove the statement: "Deflation is a contraction in the volume of money and credit relative to available goods and services"? Remember, I did not put it there in the first place. Another, third party, editor put it there. He/she and I agree that it should be in the article. You take it out. Democratically that is 2 against one. The statement should stay. Please put it back, thank you.


 * PennySeven (talk) 18:20, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I wish to point out again that I am not the author of the statement. So, I have no personal interest in this statement, except for improving Wikipedia.


 * PennySeven (talk) 17:24, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove statements from articles without first discussing it as you did in Deflation.
Please do not remove statements from articles without first discussing it.I know you will not be blocked for "edit warring" or for being a "disruptive editor" as I would be if I should revert your removal, but, please discuss statements on the talk page before you remove them.

PennySeven (talk) 18:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Justification for new page: Squeeze job
Irv (talk) 20:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Sorry -- pls disregard if I left this on the wrong person's User Talk page. Irv (talk) 20:42, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

thanks
thanks for the note about the 'post, looks like someone fixed it already. -- phoebe / (talk to me) 16:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank You for Welcome
Thank you for welcome message on my talk page... :) slash (talk) 20:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Jill Davis
The subject's publisher's website is a pretty frail reed to lean on, especially for NPOV reasons. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:27, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It's not that it's a website, but that it's her publisher's website. A publisher is a commercial enterprise, whose goal is to sell books. They do that in part by selling the authors, as well as the books. The more notable they make an author sound, the more likely they are to sell the reader on that author's book. Thus, there is an inherent COI and an uncertainty as to reliability of source. These pages are the venue of the publisher's publicity department, not editorial. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:14, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Hydrogen spectral series
Hi, do you have a source for the information you added in this edit? I'm trying to get this article properly referenced. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 17:32, 18 March 2009

AfD nomination of Article title
An editor has nominated Cryptic Fate, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)(UTC)

Oooops! sorry forgot the important bit. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

I need your help to write a thesis.
Dear RJFJR,

I am a student in Seoul National University in South Korea doing a research project on Wikipedia. I am very impressed about your insight and active contributions. I thought you could provide some opinions really worthwhile. So, would it be possible for you to take some time off and give an online interview via E-mail? It would provide my project a lively voice of an actual administrator. And this will be of a great meaning; your experience, concerns, opinions and ideas would add a lot to my project. Actually I'm in real need of something concrete; for my project is about the mechanism a biased version of explanation is settled, and as you will probably guess, understanding such things involves a lot more than just watching explicit process. Again, I would really, really appreciate your help.

If you are willing to give some help, would you mind mailing me swiftly? I have a list of questions about Wiki. Thanks a lot. I also leave this message to other administrators' user talk for my research. And further I'm a starter so I couldn't find your e-mail address. Please don't be upset about that.

bongeun319@hanmail.net Sincerely, Bongeun Myarchives (talk) 07:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Forces sweetheart listed as a Stub
I have noticed your recent edits to Forces sweetheart. You have added the template. This is fine and your contributions are appreciated. But in future, to aid in the expansion of articles, such as this one, please use a more specific stub template. A list of stub templates can be found here: WikiProject Stub sorting/List of stubs. Thank you. -- Patchy1 (talk) 01:26, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Japanese cultural artifacts controversy
An article that you have been involved in editing, Japanese cultural artifacts controversy, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Japanese cultural artifacts controversy (2nd nomination). Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Enki H. (talk) 23:05, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

June/July
Oops, my mistake. I must have put July without noticing. Sorry about that; I was editing in a hurry after a long day. Copana2002 (talk)

Help_desk question: white space at top of article because of pictures
 Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 13:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Androuet du Cerceau
If you are going to do the split, please finish it properly - links between the new articles, categories, removing material only relevant to one family member etc. Thank you. Johnbod (talk) 20:45, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from Doc Freemans
Hello RJFJR, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Doc Freemans has been removed. It was removed by Jclemens with the following edit summary ' (Decline prod, has sourcing, probably meets GNG. Feel free to AfD.) '. Please consider discussing your concerns with Jclemens before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 21:30, 18 August 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Thank you
Thanks for moving the list of chapters back to its own page. It was like that before but someone decided to move it to the main article which I found to be a tad messy.crazzycorbe (talk) 04:13, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Andrew Wailes
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Andrew Wailes, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.rmp.org.au/conductor.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

A redirect you edited has been listed at RfD
You may want to add your input to the discussion at Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 August 28. -- &oelig; &trade; 03:39, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Dabomb87 (talk) 22:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of The Bowmans
I have nominated The Bowmans, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The Bowmans. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 19:45, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Carbon Burning process
I just did a re-write of Carbon burning process, an Astronomy article. I added a couple of references which covered all my changes. The page previously had lots of warnings about lack of references and style. I am hoping that I have improved it enough for some of these to be lifted. I also contacted user:Rursus who posted on the Carbon burning process talk page and who's page says he's an astronomer saying roughly what I am saying here. I only did minor edits before so would appreciate some feedback. I have chased up all my links and checked the page history for the version prior to my edit. Thanks for your time Puzl bustr (talk) 13:11, 17 October 2009 (UTC)


 * As a follow-up, I've added some more footnote refs, some of which I have combined as journal article refs and external links, whilst leaving the external links section blank. This is probably bad style, so would like some advice. I'd like to have the article footnote ref in the ref list and the URL in the external link, but don't know how one does this so that the reader can connect the footnote to the URL except the way I've done it. I also explained why one needs stellar models to computer temperatures and densities for carbon burning, and the figures vary based upon the stellar mass, and linked to a database which gives these figures. Hope this helps explain why it was not so easy to give a simple reference for the temp and density for the fusion processes sections which you queried about.Puzl bustr (talk) 14:53, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

R136
Tried to clean up this Astronomy article by explaining the difference between R136 and R136a, about which there had been confusion. Changed all refs to ADSABS citations, and tried to make the refs complete. Gave simple explanation of what R136 is and what its component R136a is. Removed star chart for R136a (since article supposed to be about R136, see above about confusion) and all references to section on R136a, now defunct. Added refs for all this. Hopefully it can lose some warnings now. Puzl bustr (talk) 17:01, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing LDR
Brain fart, and I usually check but I was writing it as I was being called to a meeting. Thanks again. SPhilbrick T  16:08, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Real estate license
There was an unclosed ref tag, i.e. "&lt;/ref" ... meaning everything after this was being included in that ref, including the reflist tag itself, which thus couldn't be shown... Evercat (talk) 18:16, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

PPE
Hi, I've recently expanded List of personal protective equipment by body area. I'd like to move this article to Usage of personal protective equipment. Thoughts? username 1 (talk) 20:38, 3 December 2009 (UTC)


 * That list was split off from Personal protective equipment because it was too 'listy'. With your reorganization you might want to put some of your new material into the section PPE by hazard at Personal protective equipment. RJFJR (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

quick question
hey RJFJR, i just recieved your message in my inbox, i assume it was a reply to my minor edits to some pages. did i do something wrong or is this standard to send out that message to new people who have made small edits? im not trying to step on peoples toes or their hard work on their articles, i was just adding a few links within wikipedia that i thought may be helpful to readers.

i may be confused here, im just wondering if im doing the right thing, i mean no harm and if im doing it wrong/without permission etc please let me know ill stop and revert what ive done pronto.

sorry, im just confused. :S        have a nice day!! -mack  Mackdiesel5 (talk) 18:03, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Why did you redirect Condorcet criterion?
The Condorcet method article doesn't make a lot of sense when it includes links to itself, via this redirect. I don't see any discussion of the proposed "merge and redirect" on either article's talk pages, so I'm reverting it. I may be missing an AfD discussion or something, but before you remove large amounts of content please discuss it with others. --BlueGuy213 (talk) 00:57, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Whoops. I didn't see the archived talk pages on Condorcet method, where several people suggested the change. Sorry, I've reverted myself. However, removing the links to Condorcet criterion within the major article would probably be a good idea. --BlueGuy213 (talk) 01:29, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Re:Perry the Platypus Good Article Review
Gee, thanks! But could you create the GA review page with what you just told me, because I'm pretty sure it's essential to have that. Or just put it on the talk. Thanks again!  The Flash  {talk} 16:45, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, okay; I didn't notice that. I just looked over the review and it looks fine. Thanks again,  The Flash  {talk} 16:49, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'm pretty sure that's everything as well. :)  The Flash  {talk} 16:55, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Julie 84
In issue 42 of PS238, Dax, an Argonian royal, tells Julie she looks like a member of the First Royal House of Argos. Then Atlas unveils his Argonite, and poor Julie is so badly affected she falls off the spaceship. On the cover of the next issue, 43, she is seen flying the Flag of Argos! So far, this is strictly factual. Speculation: Atlas, Julie, and most if not all of the 84 FISS people (including the first Meta in the PS 238 universe) are Argonian Royals sent to Earth and kept in the dark to keep them safe from the cut-throat civil wars of the Royal Houses of Argos. I've never played the RPG. What more information does it provide about Argos, Atlas, Julie, Ron, and the FISS Metas? Das Baz, aka Erudil 17:40, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Wow, thank you for all the information! Gotta say the following: Das Baz, aka Erudil 19:23, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Only Argonians are vulnerable to Argonite, just as only Kryptonians are vulnerable to Kryptonite. So if poor Julie is affected badly by Argonite, of course she is from Argos.
 * It's a Thereain'tnojustice shame that such a nice kid as Ron should be afflicted with such a rotten name. Of course, in the Argosian language it probably means something very positive and cool. It's just bad cosmic luck it means what it does in English.
 * Atlas, Ron, Julie and Dax are all related, members of the Royal Family of Argos. The other 81 FISS metas are also probably refugees from Argos (of course they don't know it.)
 * Julie has thought of herself, all her life, as a poor underprivileged ordinary meta-girl - and now she is about to find out she is the lawful Queen of a great planet! That is going to blow her mind.
 * Remember Mr. Terrific? Also from Argos, I bet.
 * In the original concept of Kryptonite, it was totally harmless to earth humans. Later it developed that if you wore it next to your skin for a long time, it would give you cancer. Then in "Smallville" it developed that it causes meta-mutations in Earthlings. If you give it to Spider-Man, it will make him more powerful. What effect, if any, will Argonite have on Earthfolk?
 * Argosians seem to be afflcited with low self-esteem (Ron, Julie, Forak) or arrogant bullies like Dax. Maybe Dax has an inferiority complex turned inside out. That happens with Earth bullies.

Danielewicz article
Greetings,

As i receive several notes to improve my article and now also face some possible "clean up" of the page i write You in hope to get some helt here.

First, as You noticed, Im quite new on Wiki so I still have to lear lot of things. Is there anyone on Wiki that can help me in creating an article? I found on some page that there is possibility to write help talk to get soem assistance but I dont understand how to do that. Yesturday i learned how to sign message and it took me 30 minutes to find out how to do witch make me feel a little stupid here.

I reviewed my article and i can not see anything wrong with it! The references and the sources are there! Maybee I just dont undertand some policy and what more is required of me but since I do not understand and english is not my native language i really need some help here. Im not used with creating side or articles at all, the only way I learn is to watch how other people do and I copy that.

Could You please review my article and tell me what i should do? The inline citation message is something I dont understand, how pratically to change something.

I would be very helpfull of any help!

Best regards, Camdan (talk) 22:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Article One, cite needed

 * Article One of the United States Constitution has a few "citation needed" templates. &bull; Ling.Nut 12:20, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems

 * Greetings again :)


 * I have some problems with the copyright of the pictures i have in the articles of Danielewicz and Bohdanow. I did wrong firt time so I reloaded pictures again adding some tags and information abour sources and it seems still not correct. I really dont know what to do! Can You tell me what to change to make it right!? I supose to add some tag...i thought i already di and I have no clue how to change or improve!

Best regards, Camdan (talk) 13:06, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Feedback on DarkSpace
Hello,

A while ago you worked on the article DarkSpace. I have recently tried to improve the article and I'm looking for feedback. I realize you're an admin and are probably pressed for time, but since you took an interest I wanted to let you know there have been changes. If you have any suggestions let me know! --Culix (talk) 04:43, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Article One of the United States Constitution/GA1
Hi there. The review process at the above article lapsed, but i have corresponded with Reywas and have taken over reviewing this article. While it is the best of the pieces on the US Constitutional Articles, i think it has a long way to go, including some systemic problems that all the Article articles share. I have outlined the issues at the GA review page. You might want to take a look. Sorry you have had to wait so long on this. I may drop a note on the page of a few other active US law editors. Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 23:28, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Your edit at Highlife
Hi there. Just wanted to bring this to your attention. Amsaim (talk) 18:56, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Article feedback

 * Greetings,


 * I need some help with an article im working on and it start to be quite big already and its just half of it. Suggestions about how to devide it more properly, common feedback and so on. I would aprriciate a lot if You could just look at it and suggest something. The artile name: Clan of Ostoja.


 * Many thanks for Your help before!

Camdan (talk) 17:30, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Christy Byrne


The article Christy Byrne has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No significant coverage of this individual found at RS - all the mentions I can find are very minor (most as part of a list of players, others mentioning role in a specific game, but no more than a short sentence). Unreferenced for almost 3 years.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Phantom Steve /talk &#124;contribs \ 16:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Please note that Christy Byrne occurs in the template on that page and something should be done to the template as well if deletion occurs. History page says it may have been prodded before. RJFJR (talk) 18:26, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Joe Cali (inventor)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Joe Cali (inventor), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Joe Cali. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:22, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Joe Cali (author)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Joe Cali (author), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Joe Cali. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Heel Manager
Your question has been answered at Talk:Georgia HaseTrackinfo (talk) 19:17, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joe Cali (inventor)


The article Joe Cali (inventor) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Rettetast (talk) 08:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of CyberBunker
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is CyberBunker. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/CyberBunker (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joe Cali (inventor)


The article Joe Cali (inventor) has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Clubmarx (talk) 16:37, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I deprodded it. Now fix the article.  DGG ( talk ) 21:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

What mean your message
Could you explain to me why you did wrote on my page: " ( ~) " ?

Arthur MILCHIOR (talk) 15:26, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Oh ok. Out of curiosity, what was the page I edited you were watching ? "logspace" ? I mean, I did edit many pages since I created the account. (By the way, is there a way to find all the pages I did edited ? I guess this information is in wikipedia's database since my nickname should be in the history of the page I did edit; but I don't know if there is a way to find this information quickly) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthur MILCHIOR (talk • contribs) 03:59, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Removing cleanup tags
Hi, I still think this needs some heavy cleanup. Geschichte (talk) 07:16, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Saying Hello
Dear RJFJR,

thank you for your message! Have a nice day!

Tardigrada2008 (talk) 20:42, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Manuel Agrella
An article that you have been involved in editing, Manuel Agrella, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. jmcw (talk) 13:48, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello RJFJR! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created  is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Joe Cali (inventor) -

Bishop Edits
Hi, not meaning to be hostile about this but: Edward Bishop (Salem) was under construction. Were you bored ? Lots of folks get bored and just run through making thousands of edits because they are bored. I was working on that article and your trying to put that one section into a "neat little package" didn't really help at all. The article is part of a task group. Is there going to be a problem if I continue working on this article or was this just randomly a case of that you wanted to do some editing ? John5Russell3Finley (talk) 15:56, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Re: your comment, how's about if YOU finnish editing the article up to the point where YOU can remove the cleanup tag all by yourself, failing that I will treat your actions as vandalism and take the apropriate action John5Russell3Finley (talk) 23:18, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome.
I appreciate it, and plan to look at the suggested resources - as I do find basic edits pretty tough still. Wikipedia is amazing and I plan to stay as involved as I can. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phenylphree (talk • contribs) 09:10, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

RE:Louchely
Haha, it's probably not the most appropriate word, really, I just like the sound of it. Bob talk 15:59, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Clinical Research Investigative Studies Program for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Clinical Research Investigative Studies Program, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Clinical Research Investigative Studies Program until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dondegroovily (talk) 00:34, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

How to have 2 footnotes for the same book but at different page ranges?
Given I know I can use that ref again as but then it would reference page 3. How can I have another footnote to that same book but to page=6  ? Is there a better forum for this question? I tried looking it up in the template:cite_book help and ref help. --Javaweb (talk) 05:26, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Javaweb Thanks for the quick response and suggesting Help_desk. I'll tell you if I get a solution. Javaweb (talk) 23:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Javaweb Template:Sfn looks like my answer. Javaweb (talk) 23:37, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Javaweb

Grace period for new articles
I greatly appreciate your efforts to police Wikipedia, but today I started an article, and got called away before being able to work on it. Within a matter of hours you put a proposal for deletion tag on it.

Clearly, a 1 second "grace period" on new articles would be silly (we'd be wasting too much time flagging "works in progress"), but one week seems far too long. If there's a happy medium, where is it, and why? Do we have any historical data that could be used to drive a sensible policy (e.g.: 24-48 hours) ?

JonDePlume (talk) 19:47, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Just an alternative idea: When you are starting an article, put it in a sandbox page rather than publishing it to the world: From Wikipedia, put this in the search box: User:JonDePlume/evercookie and then tell wikipedia you want to start a page by this name. When you are ready for worldwide publication, you can move the page to its new home. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Javaweb (talk • contribs) 21:42, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Joe Cali (inventor) for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Joe Cali (inventor), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joe Cali (inventor) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gigs (talk) 15:59, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Blocking or Banning Serr2161
This is a new id contributing nothing but vandalism. See Special:Contributions/Serr2161 Reversing the edits are squandering editor's time Could you take a please take a look when you have a chance? I will be putting a polite note on the User_talk:Serr2161 page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Javaweb (talk • contribs) 19:52, 14 November 2010 (UTC) UPDATE: Problem has been resolved by others. Please ignore this request for help. --Javaweb (talk) 19:58, 14 November 2010 (UTC)Javaweb

24.113.35.16 vandalism
Special:Contributions/24.113.35.16 shows that ip address generates vandalism. Could you take a peek and see what can be done to minimize future damage, perhaps a block or ban? The ip address has been warned on the Talk page Javaweb (talk) 23:55, 17 November 2010 (UTC)Javaweb Thank you for your quick reply and the guideline. Javaweb (talk) 00:02, 19 November 2010 (UTC)Javaweb

There's a reply waiting for you at...
Talk:List of life extension-related topics  The Transhumanist 22:02, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

lists on Klein talk
Can I refactor this slightly so it's clear what was a list and what was a talkpage section? And I completely agree with you on removing them. tedder (talk) 17:13, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Feel free to refactor. RJFJR (talk) 17:15, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

About Malleswaram article
Hello, The article on Malleswaram is just written like an essay. For example: 'Huge student community is visible from the numerous tutorials that are available and more so if one visits the CCD, the Mantri Mall, Sankey Tank and numerous chaat shops. Even shops like Veena Stores and CTR give you a picture of the whole of India having a dish of "idli-vada" and asking for some more "chutney". and this too: New CCD coming up in front of Sankey Tank and McDonald's just opposite to the 13th Cross Malleswaram Market / Bus Stand on Sampige Road. Only thing missing is a non-veg fast food joint which is affordable. Even the section Prominent Landmarks' looks like an advertising of the area. I believe that the section should not be included and the entire article reviewed and re-wrttien to look like an encyclopedia. Thanks, Abhishek191288 (talk) 12:59, 24 December 2010 (UTC)


 * The section "Prominent Landmarks" lists some eat-outs, schools & colleges, book stores, temples, Hindu religious establishments (Matha), grocery stores/ vegetable markets, etc in Malleswaram. This is clearly not encyclopedic. Infact, I was about to delete it, but by then you moved it to the talk page. Abhishek191288 (talk) 15:46, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Monster Player Kill


The article Monster Player Kill has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for reference found a single published (gBooks) WP:RS mention in Geektionary: From Anime to Zettabyte, an A to Z Guide to All Things Geek, Adams Media, 2011 . Given the 2011 publication date it could well be sourced from this long unreferenced article. Fails WP:N and WP:V

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 23:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

WikiProject Dacia
 Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in ancient Dacia. Would you like to join the WikiProject Dacia? It is a project aimed to better organize and improve the quality and accuracy of the articles related to these topics. We need help expanding and reviewing many articles, and we also need more images. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards! --Codrin.B (talk) 21:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of USA Bowl


The article USA Bowl has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable semi-pro football game, fails WP:N, WP:GNG, and WP:NSPORTS. No sources cited, fails WP:RS (only link is organization's website). Any team that could be declared a "national champion" ought to have a source available somewhere if it's even remotely notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paul McDonald (talk) 14:34, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Black album
The songs require songwriter credits. :) WikiProject_Albums/Article_body. Cheers! Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Mathesius
He was a senior partner in a notable firm, the article has a source and others can be found, at least I've scoped a few on Google Books that would work. It certainly doesn't qualify for a prod. Like I said, you can take it to AFD, I really don't care, and it won't bother me at all. But it should be done right. IvoShandor (talk)

Page for you to watch
Apologies if this is to the wrong person or in the wrong place. You are the most recent admin I could find who has been involved with the page in question.

Rothesay_Netherwood_School I reverted that due to some blatant vandalism (a school run by elves, located in the glorious Emerald Forest  among other things). You might want to keep an eye on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.225.222 (talk) 03:03, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Thanks
NIce surprise to have a personal welcome! Slightly curious as to why you, not that it matters, just curious on wikiprocedure being new and all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filmmaker2011 (talk • contribs) 17:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

I guess it could have been the page move request I asked for, which I noticed still hasn't been done, could you oblige old chap? Filmmaker2011 (talk) 18:01, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

vandalize your own user:talk page?
After so many contributions and so much work, I was reprimanded by one of the wikipedia administrators concerning a comment I posted in the discussion section for Nelly Furtado. I cannot and do not wish to remove all my previous contributions but some form of hara-kiri is demanded. Is it possible to remove my user:talk page? If so, how?TonyMath (talk) 03:17, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

New user/old user
Halo RJFJR!

Thank you very much for your nice words of welcome!

Here comes my questions. I’m present on english Wikipedia with username Krzysztofiaczek (since 20 January 2008). I have created a global account on polish Wikipedia and I’like to delete my old Krzysztofiaczek (User ID: 6240065) account because I dont't need it. How can I do this? I’d like to transfer all old edits history to the present account and copy my old user page and paste it to the new one to introduce myself. Is it possible too?

Awaiting your reply with great pleasure.

Kind regards! --Krzysztof 13 (talk) 13:19, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Service award level
 There has been a major revision of the the Service Awards: the edit requirements for the higher levels have been greatly reduced, to make them reasonably attainable. Because of this, your Service Award level has been changed, and you are now eligible for a higher level. I have taken the liberty of updating your award on your user page.

Herostratus (talk) 13:50, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Actually you jumped two levels, to Master Editor. Congratulations, and thank you for your many contributions! Herostratus (talk) 13:50, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome
Thanks for the welcome message on my talk page! Nice palindrome username too. I have followed your advice and have written my first article. Hope it followed the rules correctly! Here is my first article, Gala Inc Mtstaffa (talk) 03:39, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

I-75 in FL
I see that you had added the weight/inspection stations to the exit list. They should be added though as separate lines like the toll plazas. removed your additions, but I think if you had added them like the toll plazas, he might not have reverted that addition. I'm still in favor of moving all of that stuff into the exit list though, so ping me if you need help. Also, we have a discussion at WT:USRD about old and new exit numbers that will affect this article.  Imzadi 1979  →   22:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, I did like the idea of adding them in the same way as toll plazas at first, as per the discussion. But then I realized that this format was eliminated from a segment of Interstate 95 in Maryland that had it's own page, and that these features are considered motorist services, so perhaps they're better off in the existing chapter. DanTD (talk) 12:38, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * And I disagree. The fact that one article did something isn't binding consensus. Many other articles list services in the junction/exit list tables. U.S. Route 491, a featured article that appeared on the Main Page for July 4 included an inspection station in its junction list. In fact every British motorway article lists their motorway services in the junction list as separate entries unless combined with a GSJ (grade-separated junction) complete with "Services" as the junction number. Since we seem to agree to pull the old exit numbers, I can convert the entire table for the article over to the jctexit//jctbridge templates which will simplify adding in the various additions. Why should we have three mileage-based lists (exits/toll plazas, weigh stations and rest areas) when they can be listed all in one place?  Imzadi 1979   →   19:16, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay then, so why were Maryland House, Chesapeake House, and Delaware House eliminated from the exit lists of I-95 in Maryland and Delaware? And are you planning to add this to other highway articles? DanTD (talk) 20:36, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Once again, I don't know. MOS:RJL says that they should be added back.  Imzadi 1979  →   22:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Redirects / Un-redirects
Thank you for your most gracious welcome. I do have questions relating to redirects. I successfully did one for Agum-Kakrime, a legitimate alias, but I wish to start an article for Kurigalzu I and I find somebody else has already redirected it to a table of kings in the article on the Kassites. This may have been sensible in the absence of an article, but frankly, this is a rare example of a Kassite king with a fair amount of material worthy of a dedicated article. How do I un-redirect, so I can create a new article?

I am contemplating redirecting the character “Nazi-Bugash / Shuzigash” to the tail-end of the Burna-Buriash II article, where he is briefly referenced as “son of a nobody”, which is, I believe, the ancient Mesopotamians telling us that he isn’t notable enough for his own article. Obviously I wouldn’t want to do this if later evidence emerges to the contrary, so the ease of un-redirecting is critical.BigEars42 (talk) 02:21, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your message and one more question
Hello! Thank you for your welcome message. Thank you! MajaEdits (talk) 17:11, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your welcome message
I really appreciate the way, new contributors are greeted here. What you could not know, is that my first edit in the german wikipedia was back in 2004, and since then I have been contributing there regularly. Only in the last months I have started to edit the english WP as well. Have a good time and "herzliche Grüße" from germany! --J.Ammon (talk) 10:05, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for welcoming me to Wikipedia. I may call upon your services very soon; the article I am working on is proving to be quite tricky. Tristanlbailey (talk) 13:03, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you from Uri Levy
Hello RJFJR, I truly appreciate your greetings: ("I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!")

Now:

1. If you can send your regular e-mail address to me, I will have, as a beginner, much easier way of communication (I hope it is "legal").

2. Delete "Hidden Categories"

In the "Magnetic Tower of Hanoi" article, I find these hidden categories: Category:All articles with dead external links Category:All articles with unsourced statements Category:Articles with dead external links from November 2009 Category:Articles with unsourced statements from September 2011 What are these categories? How did they get in? How can they be removed?!

Thanks again,

Uri

~

Thanks from Mn-imhotep
Hello RJFJR, Thank You for Your Greetings and Your intention to help, when help is needed. all the best.Mn-imhotep (talk) 07:17, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Bushmen healing and rock art (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * was linked to Hunting and gathering

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:17, 16 November 2011 (UTC)