User talk:RJR3333/Archive 4

Claims against me
I know that you are going to delete this, but you need to stop using my name this way. I did not state that all of your edits are bad. I stated why I objected to some of your edits, and I gave you advice time and time again. In our recent discussion on this very talk page, in fact, I gave you advice that is pretty much the same advice you received in this diff. So stop using my name inappropriately, that is as an excuse to remove your edits and whatever else. Once you submit content to Wikipedia, it is Wikipedia's property anyway and therefore there are times when undoing your edits because you don't like them are invalid. In this case, though, some of your edits have been contested and none of them will harm the articles upon removal, so you should be fine to revert them. Flyer22 (talk) 19:16, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * You did say that most of my edits were bad, at least in the topics you were interested in. So I was not entirely misrepresenting what you said just exageratting. You never said anything positive about any of my edits. And it isn't a claim against you if I'm taking the edits down I'm admitting you were correct. --198.51.130.170 (talk) 00:08, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I responded in this link, as you would have seen regardless. Flyer22 (talk) 01:41, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I would like to take the opportunity to clarify that I am sorry for having been rude to Flyer22. However, I don't see where she's coming from when she says I'm editing the articles in a biased manner. All I wanted to add to the pedophilia article was the fact some people want to change the minimum age to 18, I did not advocate portraying it as a done deal or even endorse the proposal. I have been trying to edit the articles in a neutral tone. --RJR3333 (talk) 23:42, 27 June 2012 (UTC)