User talk:RJaguar3/Archive 1

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. My name is Hdt83. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to the free encyclopedia anybody can edit. If you have any questions about Wikipedia, feel free to leave me a message on my talk/chat page or by typing   at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages to help you. The left column contains tutorials and introductory pages while the right shows ways to help out Wikipedia.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

'''Again, welcome! :)''' -- Hdt83  Chat 02:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Regarding Alexa DiBenedetto (copied from talk page)
It's not autobiographical. I am not Alexa DiBenedetto. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Moo0831 (talk • contribs).
 * Please see the comment I wrote you on your talk page. RJaguar3 16:39, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Chen from MathCounts on Regis & Kelly
Here's the source http://forums.go.com/forums/regisandkelly/v2/info?messageID=5449371&start=0 I was joking by the way because he is my friend, but its true. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Boy jew (talk • contribs).
 * Please look at your talk page for a reply. RJaguar3 01:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Ferret Page
Why did you change the qutoe from the past NYC mayor from weasel to ferret. That is a direct quote(I do not agree with him though). Changing it will make it not what was said in the media and not what belongs in that section. NordicFire 19:19, 15 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I just listened to the recording here.  (scroll to about 2:00 in).  It's ferret. RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  02:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

--Crap, Thanks I could of sworn it to be weasel. NordicFire 19:39, 15 July 2007 (UTC)


 * He does later repeat the same line (or something like that) with "weasel." But given that the article is about ferrets, I think the ferret quote would be better for the article.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  02:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

AIV report
Thank you for making a report at Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators generally only block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. The issue here is that we generally don't block IP addresses unless there's a lot of vandalism after recent warnings. Anyway, thanks for the effort. Keep up the counter-vandalism!--Chaser - T 05:50, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Is there a general rule of thumb for how long ago a final warning has to have been in order to be "recent"? RJaguar3 | u  |  t  06:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

251
Hah, nicely done :-)--Cronholm144 04:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

In an unrelated note. What maths class are you in?--Cronholm144 04:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I've finished taking multivariable calculus, real analysis, and linear algebra (at my local community college). RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  04:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

My my, impressive. You will have a nice head start in college (I assume you will be going for a PhD). DiffEQs are the next logical step. (Complex analysis is fun too.) Have you considered joining WP:WPM?--Cronholm144 04:52, 18 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Not yet. I'll go and do that right now.  Thanks.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  04:54, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Serbian Wikipedia
Hello friend, i am from serbian wikipedia, i a want to ask can i use vp on my wiki. There i have almost 4000 conts. Cheers--Fica Blok38 14:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Be sure to mention that to Daniel, otherwise you will be rejected outright. (with your en.wiki editcount that is)--Cronholm144 14:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Didn't know that. Anyways, like Cronholm said, you'll want to leave him a note saying that.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  14:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Shane McMahon Profile
Shane McMahon's WWE Profile was deleted from the WWE website.

--Ug88 18:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)Ug88


 * I see. I've undone my edit.  Next time, if you delete something, please leave a note in the edit summary stating the reason for deleting the content.  It could be something simple, like "rm dead link".  This way, we can avoid another misunderstanding.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  18:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

User:BoxCrawler
This is a bot account, and your contribution interrupted it, please have a look at the user page before posting to talk pages. Thanks Adam McCormick 03:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Oops. Sorry about that. RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  04:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Wheel of Fortune vowels
I don't want to get into an edit war, so I'm not reverting your revert, but "cwm" is not an English word, and the vowel in "bow" is "O". The show's rules specify that Y is a consonant, but they don't mention W, probably because it never occurred to them that they would have a puzzle with "cwm" in it. :) JTRH 16:23, 20 July 2007 (UTC)


 * See here for "cwm". I agree, it's kind of a moot point, and the abridged copy of the rules does only specify "Y", so you do have a point.  I wouldn't mind if you reverted it.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  19:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, RJaguar3! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. ∆ 22:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

David Ortiz
I did not provide or post any information about David Ortiz. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.168.82.174 (talk) 17:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * You edited History of baseball in the United States. Your edit changed Mark McGwire to David Ortiz.  While Mark McGwire has been suspected of using steroids, David Ortiz's article makes no mention of steroids.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  00:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks
 Thank you for supporting me in my recent RFA which unfortunately did not pass at (47/23/5). I will be sure to improve my editing skills and wait till someone nominates me next time. Have a great day(or night)! -- Hdt 83     Chat 05:48, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

vandalism on autrey mill page
Hey buddy...what the heck do you have against Tin Tin (Tianyi Lu)? Hang on..."CHEN from MathCounts"???? You're not... could you possibly be... Stan? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eyeofdatiger (talk • contribs) 02:46, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Greetings!
Your edits popped up on my watchlist, and I thought I recognized the username, so I thought I would stop by and bid greetings to the great G^2. I was one of your very temporary former coaches for a tournament in Florida circa 6/07. I was the one that didn't hail from Moline. LonelyBeacon (talk) 18:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

add back the shirt links
yes it is not ebay, but people want to get shirts from the show and the links help them find them. it's not for the stores, it's for the fans... reconsider. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.45.84.52 (talk) 08:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * No I won't reconsider. Here's why:
 * Wikipedia has a policy that strongly discourages these types of links.
 * Wikipedia is not intended to be eBay. I do appreciate that some fans might want shirts, but that's why eBay is there.  Adding such commercial links is spam and unencyclopedic.
 * If anything else, fans can Google search and come up with links to these sites.
 * But thanks for discussing with me. RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  03:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Sports entertainment / Legends of the Hidden Temple
Well, the thing about "sports entertainment" is that it doesn't necessarily have to be a sport. It's usually highly theatric entertainment that centers around competition with sporting elements (and not necessarily outright athletics).

From what I remember of the show, I think it would fit, but I also might be confusing it with something else. Check out the descriptions on the sports entertainment page and lemme know what you think. TravelingCat (talk) 03:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I just read the article, and I'm still inclined to say that Legends is not sports entertainment. While there were many physical challenges during the show, that wasn't the focus.  Rather, the main point of the show was for the teams to engage in a historical/mythological quest, not to perform various sporting activities (like Nickelodeon GUTS).  Something like GUTS would be a closer fit to sports entertainment.  Furthermore, nearly every Nickelodeon game show had physical activity to some extent, and I wouldn't want to have to classify shows like Double Dare and Make the Grade as "sports entertainment." RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  17:29, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

College of DuPage
The article has been gutted and cleaned up pretty well, in my opinion. Do you agree with removing the POV tag? Tool2Die4 (talk) 19:41, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Me likey. I gutted a lot more original research (unpublished synthesis of original ideas).  Let me know what you think of my edit.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  03:01, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Works for me. Good job. Tool2Die4 (talk) 10:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Editor review/RJaguar3
Hello, I gave some advice in you editor review.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 11:24, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I appreciate your comments.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  12:38, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

the hidden temple team images (animals)
They were all stolen by the message board user (from the forum) from HiddenTempleTees.com without permission and then used on this wikipedia site without permission. Although the user claims to have made the images himself, the artist recreations were designed for HiddenTempleTees.com in early 2007. Please remove the images or give credit to the HiddenTempleTees.com website right away. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.45.84.52 (talk) 17:37, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * After checking the site, I agree. I just sent MyPartyShirts.com (the owner of the site) an e-mail via their contact form essentially acknowledging the fact and stating that they would have to license those renderings of the images under the GFDL in order for them to be used on Wikipedia.  (I apologize for not having the exact text, since Internet Explorer, like any Microsoft product, crashed right in the middle of going here to post what I had written in the contact form.)  That being said, since I did not visit the site before, and I had no reason to doubt Piranesi's claim that he created the images himself.  I apologize for any inconvenience.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  23:29, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Get the Picture on Nick GAS
Well, Get the Picture has been at 1pm ET/12pm CT for 4 years, at 4pm ET/3pm CT for more than 2 years & 3am ET/2am CT for more than 3 years on Nick GAS and now it will be replaced with any show that is on(Nickelodeon GUTS, Legends of the Hidden Temple, Nick Arcade, Figure It Out & Double Dare 2000) or other show who havent been air in the while like Wild and Crazy Kids, Global GUTS, Finders Keepers, Double Dare, Super Sloppy Double Dare & Family Double Dare. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.230.148.189 (talk) 03:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Um, okay... What are you asking of me?  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  10:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Hmm... I just talking about Get the Picture on Nick GAS. The Main Reason why Get the Picture is still on GAS it has been at 1-2pm ET/12-1pm CT since April 2004 & It has never been replaced by another show that's currently airing or not been airing.
 * I know that Get the Picture has been on Nick GAS for an eternity, just like the other shows they're rerun abused like no tomorrow. Did you want to ask me something about Get the Picture or Nick GAS?  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  01:00, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Get the Picture.
 * All right. I feel comfortable in answering a question.  Go ahead and ask me something.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  22:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you!
Your help = always welcome! LonelyBeacon (talk) 01:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Legends of the Hidden Temple
I failed the GA nomination for Legends of the Hidden Temple for multiple reasons, mostly the fact that two of the sources (a Geocities cite and a Freewebs site) did not meet the criteria for reliable sources; with these sites removed from the article, more than half of it wound up unreferenced. Furthermore, there was some original research in the footnotes, as well as an overly detailed plot summary (gameplay info). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:23, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Please see the article's talk page for a discussion of reliable sources which you might be interested in. RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  15:32, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Your edits to List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon
Hello. While Wikipedia does encourage users to be bold and edit articles, your edits to List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon are construed as edit warring. Please discuss your changes on the talk page rather than reverting the article to your version. Users who continue to revert war may be blocked. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u  |  t  13:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

'''There has been ample discussion on the topic already. That was not vandalism to the article. There is only one user who persists vandalizing the article by adding un-cited information and air dates, and that's Sarge100 who is creating such an upheaval that it appears that more people are against it, but if you look at the talk page, this user is the only one who wants the article to have un-cited information. Please think things through before you accuse people, luckily I'm very perceptive. 216.70.26.237 (talk) 00:35, 29 May 2008 (UTC)216.70.26.237'''

Rollback
After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you do not want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Rudget  (Help?) 15:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback may be removed at any time.

Comment from User:Paraparanormal
Relax. God. Obviously you were to busy eating your Cheetos and mom's mini pizzas to see I left a comment saying I just am starting the page and if anyone can add more it would be great. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paraparanormal (talk • contribs) 18:31, June 12, 2008
 * First, cut the personal attacks against me, as they are very much uncalled for. Second, I have no idea to what page you are referring, and since I am not an admin, I cannot see the page, since it was deleted.  You may want to find an administrator (Special:Listusers) and ask them.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  23:38, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Im talking about Bruno Covington
 * The deletion log shows that User:Edgar181 deleted the page. You may want to leave him a message.  Again, I can't otherwise help you, as I have no access to deleted pages.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  23:58, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Was up yo.How you doin bubba? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paraparanormal (talk • contribs) 23:00, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm fine, thanks. RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  23:58, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

How do you like the award I gave you? Paraparanormal (talk) 00:19, 18 June 2008 (UTC) How do you get that thing that says your offline? Paraparanormal (talk) 03:08, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It's a version of Topaz's status changer (which I have not updated in a long time). To install it, you need to do the following:
 * Copy these lines into Special:Mypage/monobook.js.

inc("User:Topaz/init.js"); inc("User:Topaz/util.js"); inc("User:Topaz/comm.js"); inc("User:Topaz/wputil.js"); inc("Special:Mypage/statuschanger.js");
 * Copy the text of the page User:Topaz/statuschanger.js to Special:Mypage/statuschanger.js.
 * Clear your browser's cache (Ctrl+F5).
 * Put on your userpage in the place you want your status to show up.

Let me know if you have any problems. RJaguar3 | u  |  t  04:53, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Its not coming up all that is coming up is the code. Paraparanormal (talk) 02:13, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Try copying replacing the lines under the first comment in configuration with the following lines:

topaz.statuschanger.statuscode = { online:' ', around:' ', offline:' ', wikibreak:' ' };
 * Also, you may want to blank User:Paraparanormal/Status, so that a sysop can delete it. Let me know if you run into any other problems.  Also, feel free to ask on the help desk.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  03:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

John Birch Society
I noticed you deleted the updates to the John Birch Society wiki page written by Publiusohio. The parts you deleted had correct citations and factual data. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitacore (talk • contribs) 00:52, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, but they are clearly pushing a point of view more favorable to them than should be given. Just because it's true doesn't necessarily mean it belongs on Wikipedia.  All significant points of view, liberal and conservative, have to be given a fair treatment.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  00:57, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The "accepted" John Birch Society article has biased and inaccurate data that mislabels and flat out attacks the John Birch Society. The "accepted" JBS article is not neutral nor balanced. - Vitacore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitacore (talk • contribs) 02:02, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Point out which specific portions you think are unfair. I personally think your revision, in addition to removing negative facts, is trying to impress the belief that the founding fathers would be in favor of such an organization.  Many parts of your revision amount to unpublished synthesis of facts, which is not what Wikipedia is trying to create. RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  02:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

New American
If you thought the JBS article was bad, look at this one! Love the 'many of our articles' bit. AfD? Doug Weller (talk) 06:01, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing that out. I nominated it for AfD due to a lack of coverage from independent sources.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  07:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Wheel of Fortune
Unfortunately, I don't know how to cite this, but it was an advertisement during WOF itself. Samer (talk) 02:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

confused
I am sorry I dont think you know me. Please refrain from messaging me. I do not understand why you even have the time to go to my page try to get me deleted. I wrote nothing inappropriate. I simply wrote out my bio. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ishmay7 (talk • contribs) 01:03, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Greetings!


 * While Wikipedia is not paper, it is also trying to be a free encyclopedia, and not much else. This means that we do not have 3 million articles about every John Doe who happens to have created an article about themselves.  Wikipedia has a notability guideline that subjects of articles must follow, and, also, users are discouraged from creating articles about themselves or anything closely related to them.


 * I hope you pick an article you like and find ways to improve it. If you need any suggestions, just let me know on my talk page.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  01:15, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for fixing my page.--Greg D. Barnes (talk) 01:32, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * More than happy to. RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  10:29, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Prod Notice
Why so serious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.6.189.254 (talk) 11:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Referencing and general stuff
Hello, I recently came across an article you rewrote to avoid copyright infringement. Firstly, nice job on that front. I would like to point you towards the citation templates however. You added sources to the I Can Sing a Rainbow, with the parameter, which is fine, although is generally used when the source would be used more than once. The main thing is, when you add refs, it would be extremely useful if you used the cite web template (or its equivalents for books, news etc.), as this provides more information in a structured way, making the references or notes section much more presentable and informative. It looks a it of a behemoth when you look at it, but after a few uses it's pretty easy to pick up. This template is also usually required by GA reviewers, so it's good to use it when adding a source, just so somebody doesn't have to go through an article and change them all manually! But yeah, just that really. You're doing an excellent job by the looks of it, I can certainly see you being admin material one day! If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask.

Oh yeah, the message you left on the guy's talk page wasn't signed. You might want to tick the "automatically append sig" box in the huggle message user feature. -  Toon  05  23:13, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Legends of the Hidden Temple (2nd discussion)
''Editorial note: This section was renamed from "Legends of the Hidden Temple" to avoid a duplicate section header. RJaguar3 | u  |  t  10:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)''

Hey, I'm sorry I never got back to you on this back when I reviewed the article in May, but here goes. I've been asking around on #wikipedia-en, and the consensus is that personal websites, even if by trusted users and "experts" on the subject, are generally not reliable and should be removed. This means that the Geocities, Freewebs, etc. links. Furthermore, how do we know that the links in question are by authoritative sources? I can't imagine an authoritative source using a free hosting service to get their info across. The sites you cited seemed to be by children of the 1980s who just happened to be devotees of the show and did a lot of their own research; hardly an authoritative source. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 19:29, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'm at a loss for what to do now. I've looked, and there's not much out there I can find.  Got any ideas?  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  10:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
 * EDITED TO ADD: And to what extent can I use the show itself to verify portions of the articles?  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  10:06, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

A barnstar
After you beat me to the revert button, I thought you deserved this.

Message from 86.14.47.166
''Editorial note: Section heading added for navigation. RJaguar3 | u  |  t  22:03, 5 August 2008 (UTC)'' Up yours! That was a ttly constructive edit. Freakin' nubbinz. -Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.14.47.166 (talk) 21:59, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * We're trying to build a serious encyclopedia, and not much else. Generally, standard English is preferred to leetspeak and other online languages.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  22:03, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. M0M3NTUM (talk) 04:31, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * This is patent nonsense. A PhD in garbage?  Seriously?  Furthermore, you reverted back to my version.  I don't see what the problem with my edit was.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  04:34, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Edit conflict
Did you get an "edit conflict" message when you applied the AfD tag to List of players with 22 goals and 17 assists in one month (NHL)? You actually created a new article with just an AfD tag! It might have been simpler to leave the article deleted and let me salt the title. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 22:59, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I still have no idea what happened. I went to AFD the article with Twinkle, someone else decided to speedy it instead, and that was the result.  Go ahead and salt the article; I don't mind.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  23:03, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

In fact it was an hoax - see this page - search for RJaguar3! &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 23:58, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I blush and chuckle. This proves I know next to nothing about the NHL.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  01:31, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Calvin Ayre wikipedia page
Why are you changing/adding negativity to Calvins wiki page? Answer truthfully. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.78.19.1 (talk) 16:12, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I would like you to explain why you are deleting the categories and external links from the bottom of the page. That's the only reason I'm reverting your edits.  If you think there is a problem, you can leave a message on the talk page, where editors can reach consensus on what belongs in the article.  Happy editing!  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  16:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Im not going to go to some section and chat with internet hacks "editors" about being immature and wasting peoples time. A wiki page is supposed to be about specifics relating to the topic, not to only talk about negative things to do with that topic. You seem like you are really dedicated to ensuring that people know about everything negative speculated about Calvin. You are either one of the many haters on the Calvin band wagon, OR you are involved with the Roberts clan of scum bags. Either way I wish you would move on, grow up, and do something with your life besides work towards wasting others time and making people look bad based on speculation. I wish you all the best in your life. Regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.78.19.1 (talk) 16:20, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * First, while specifics, such as accuracy are welcome, there is also an issue of neutrality. Generally, this means that all major points of view about the subject should be represented according to how common they are, without editorial comment.  Just from a quick glance at the article (since I don't personally know much about Calvin Ayre), most of the article seems to be neutral.  The fact that he was convicted seems to be pretty important, and some of the external links reflect that (and of course the official page belongs).  But like I said, you may want to leave a message on the talk page with your concerns, since editors who are more knowledgeable about Ayre than I am may be able to understand your point of view better.  Again, I don't claim to know everything, because that's simply not true.  I hope you leave your concerns there.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  16:25, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Killer Kowalski
This confirms he is deceased. D.M.N. (talk) 17:39, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * As far as I can tell, he's been removed from life support, but is not yet dead. When he does finally die, we can add in the death date.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  17:42, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The source above (which I have known in the past to be very reliable) confirms he is deceased. His official site also says the same. D.M.N. (talk) 17:45, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Okay. Thanks for the pointer.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  17:46, 30 August 2008 (UTC)