User talk:RJaguar3/Archive 2

Regarding Jerod Gunsberg
''Editorial note: section relocated. RJaguar3 | u  |  t  21:24, 6 September 2008 (UTC)''

This article should be deleted. I am not notable. I am not a musician and am no longer in the music business (I have not been in the music business for over two years). Furthermore, one of the edits to this article are inaccurate, distorted and NPOV (to say the least!): "Instead of addressing the issues in the lawsuit, Gunsberg left New York in late 2003, relocating to California and filing for bankruptcy."

Also there is extensive discussion of Stan Hartman, which does not relate to me. The bottom line is that this page should be deleted altogether. Thank you much. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerodg (talk • contribs) 16:05, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I only made one edit to the article, and from what I saw, it seemed to be an unexplained deletion of sourced content. Otherwise, I have no opinion on whether the article should or should not be deleted.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  21:24, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi
No kidding, you probably reverted a dozen pages just before myself XD.

Jeopardy!
Thanks for the heads-up. It was a slip of the mouse. I meant to hit Undo and hit rollback. In any case, this is a case of a breakdown of the good faith consensus process. This editor has declared war on this section and refuses to indicate, by tagging, what information he believes to be unsourced or to propose ways to, as he insists, integrate material from the offending section elsewhere into the article--as if it would fit appropriately into any other part of the article. He's also still operating on his initial premises which I long ago disillusioned him of--that (a) "nobody cares" about the content, (b) that "no other article on Wikipedia" contains similar content, and that (c) "nobody could ever know for sure" that the content is accurate. Though he has since relinquished all three of those positions, and though I am not the only one who has reverted him, and though I attempted to compromise with him by deleting the crufty "list" part of the section, he continues to wage the delete campaign on the section. So what next to do? Robert K S (talk) 04:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It seems to be a two-editor dispute. Have you tried getting a third opinion? RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  17:47, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism
How does adding a picture of an oil painting to an article about oil paint constitute vandalism?
 * According to the image name, it wasn't a picture of an oil painting. Either way, it's inappropriate for an article on oil painting when other more suitable works could be used. RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  21:51, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Unmarried relationship
I've removed the prod and redirected this to Cohabitation. If the creator restores the original article, send it to AFD.
 * Okay, that seems reasonable. The text of the article seemed more like the plot of Frindle than an actual Wikipedia article.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  03:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Now he's trying to use the text of Cohabitation to support his new word "Tugaged". --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I found it just before I saw your message and elected to AfD it. RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  04:13, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks...


...for reverting the nasty vandalism on my page. La Pianista ( T • C • S • R ) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

We Hugglers have to hold out for each other, eh? :) &mdash;La Pianista ( T • C • S • R ) 21:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * La Pianista, I know exactly how it feels. I think my userpage has been vandalized at least a dozen times since I started using Huggle.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  21:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, true. But on the flip side...we could see that as proof that you're doing a good job. Keep up the good work, and best wiki-wishes! :) &mdash;La Pianista ( T • C • S • R ) 21:58, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Pacman_Jones
I would like to solicit feedback concerning moving this to Adam Jones (football). It makes sense to me, but is there consensus? Please opine in the section of the article talk page. Cheers, Dlohcierekim&#39;s sock (talk) 20:37, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

About Talk:Life of Mars
Your comments are appreciated; however, please read the talk page guidelines. In particular, the talk page is for discussion of the article and reliable sources, not for general discussion of the topic. RJaguar3 | u  |  t  20:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage! D ARTH P ANDA talk 21:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't believe it
Holla Jaguar!

I just IP tagged the latest vandal, and the whois search turned up that this IP is assigned to the Office of the President of the University of California. You have indeed made powerful enemies. Next time, go revert the edits of a president from a Big 12 school. :-) Hope all is well. LonelyBeacon (talk) 05:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * To be fair, I Googled it, and it doesn't refer to the President of U of C but rather some student activities organization. In any case, I hope to keep up the good work.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  19:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I also left a warning at your most recent anonymous admirer's page ..... I agree that this much vandalism from vandals is a sign you are on the right track. LonelyBeacon (talk) 03:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I saw that too. It was only because you posted a message to his talk page that I finally realized he was harassing a lot of other people in the same way, which led me to remove the comment.
 * In any case, if you're talking about vandalism, you should see my userpage history. :) RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  03:17, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh, I've seen it ..... usually someone else gets there before I do. You're a trooper as always. LonelyBeacon (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Overdue -

By the way...
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page on October 6! ... disco spinster   talk  00:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Nice catch
Looks like you also deemed 203.59.209.31 highly suspicious. Changing a load of articles high speed is weird on its own, especially when it started reverting your reverts high speed. I took the liberty to rollback each and every recent edit changing names as i doubt they were true as well. Nice work catching it! And with kind regards, Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 18:30, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I think I dealt with this guy last month, too. Thanks for helping revert the dubious additions.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  18:32, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Comment by Anon User
''Editorial Note: section relocated and title added. RJaguar3 | u  |  t  00:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)''

MY MESSAGE TO YOU -

I AM NECRYPSYS I DECIDED TO CHANGE MY TALK PAGE FUCKING STUPID ASS
 * Greetings! Since Wikipedia does not generally release IP addresses, there is no way for me to tell if you and the user in question are one and the same.  In the future, you may want to log in to edit your userpage, so that it is clear that it is not some random IP editing a userpage (which I have had happen to me).  I apologize for the misunderstanding.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  00:19, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Ohhh its coolll homie no worriessss Lets still be friends, k??

lolll the thing about the oil painting above cracked me up —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.204.190.103 (talk) 20:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Darnit
You are way too fast for my NPP edits. Abestic28 (talk) 02:06, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you Melburnian (talk) 02:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lifja
A tag has been placed on Lifja requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. FlyingToaster (talk) 02:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for both the user page rollback and the report of User:216.246.172.6. You beat me to both! --Matt (talk) 03:58, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
I trust you were not too shocked! LessHeard vanU (talk) 19:50, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for removing vandalism from my talk page. :) Soliloquialtalk 03:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Hello
Thank you very much for the warm welcome RJaguar3. --SkinnardOlympics (talk) 04:48, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It's always a pleasure. Let me know if you have any questions.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  04:49, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * RJaguar3 where can i start a new article? If you need something to be started I would gladly help out. Thanks --SkinnardOlympics (talk) 04:55, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has a lot of articles on millions of subjects, but there are always articles still waiting to be created. You can check the subject listing at Wikipedia's requested articles if you're looking for something to create.  You can also edit existing pages that need improvement.  Finally, if you have a particular interest, you may want to join a wikiproject and collaborate with others on articles in that same subject.  Happy editing!  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  05:05, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Vandal
I think you are mistaken. I didn't vandalize the page. I reverted. 76.87.219.138 is who you are looking for. 24.18.240.159 (talk) 20:22, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * My bad. I saw that Beaver Falls was changed to *** Falls, and thought it was a hoax.  I apologize.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  21:43, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

If you think my edits are vandalism.
Then stop deleting articles about maltese people. Soulfruits (talk) 22:05, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I think you may want to read Why was my page deleted. In particular, you should not take it as an offense to you.  Wikipedia does have notability policies, and there is not a bias.  I deleted the article that you created because it seemed to be a bad-faith creation.  You may also want to see Your first article.  Happy editing!  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  22:10, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you


Res2216firestar has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thanks for the vandal revert on my talk page.--Res2216firestar 18:37, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Fraserburgh Page
I am editing this page because the "Drug problem" is only speculation created by the British tabloids: NOT BASED ON FACT! I live in this town and the drug problem is almost non-existant, yet we are plastered with abuse whereever we go because of sites like this who allow people to post without relevant facts to back it up!

Also James Hutcheson is a former shelfstacker now offshore worker: He is NOT an author of a non-existant book!! If you wont take down the drug problem section, then please take down the James Hutcheson section! Unless you can find a copy of the book he is said to have written???

Also, I DID discuss the edits in the edit summary section! If you chose to read them you would have noticed that!

Comment from User:Rsandrock
''Editorial note: section added. so, when you set my page for speedy deletion, and i contest it, it gets deleted anyway without any answer? how am i supposed to know why it didn't pass? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsandrock (talk • contribs) 01:42, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * See WP:CSD and WP:WWMPD. You may also want to contact User:Akradecki, since he deleted the page.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  01:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

SCANDALOUS!
i would've had that european union edit but my computer froze! —Preceding unsigned comment added by JJ cool D (talk • contribs) 23:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Regarding Dreamgirls
Editorial note: section moved RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  23:37, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Please stop reverting my edits and look into what means, when used properly. Thanks. Thegeneralguy (talk) 23:33, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * My apologies. I'm sorry, but I'm all too familiar with the other meaning, and I thought it was meant to be ...-come-... instead of ...-cum-...  My mistake; please accept my apologies.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  23:37, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Jerry Garret
Hi. This spurious claim ("In computer programming classes around the world, he is often quoted by textbooks as an example of a perfect programmer.") makes the article inappropriate for speedy. However, I strongly recommend AfD where the claim can be analysed to see if it has any truth. --Dweller (talk) 18:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Nominated for AfD as such. RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  02:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of rooms of the Hidden Temple
I have nominated List of rooms of the Hidden Temple, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of rooms of the Hidden Temple. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. RJaguar3 | u  |  t  06:00, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

List of rooms of the Hidden Temple
Well, one reason I've been involved editing in the page is because Legends of the Hidden Temple is one of my most favorite programs of all time. --98.192.44.39 (talk) 14:32, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I was just notifying you of the AfD on the sub-article. Don't consider it a punishment, as it is not; the AfD simply means that there will be a discussion as to whether the article should be on Wikipedia.  And, for your reference, I happen to know a lot about the show (as you might be able to tell from my screen name), but WP:ILIKEIT is not a good argument in a deletion discussion, should you elect to participate (which I certainly hope you do).  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  16:38, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your welcome
My only other account was banned due to suspected sock puppetry, so thanks for welcoming me. --Suckpuppet (talk) 04:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It's always a pleasure. RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  04:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

man am I sorry
I think you know what.... Thingg &#8853; &#8855; 18:09, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
For reverting vandal, now that was quick. :-) BigDunc  Talk 21:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for reverting the edit to my user page - I had no idea I was so "popular" Ruhrfisch &gt;&lt;&gt; &deg; &deg; 04:28, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It's no problem. I've been popular too (as a quick glance through my userpage history will illustrate).  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  04:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

BrainSurge
I overturned the deletion per the apparent consensus at DRV, but the article is still severely lacking. Since you asked for undeletion, I'd like to ask you to provide a few reference to avoid another deletion and handle the presumed advert issues. - Mgm|(talk) 12:23, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Greg.collver.articles
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  18:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Geronimo
''Editorial note: section heading added. RJaguar3 | u  |  t  06:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

All I did to Geronimo is link to Wikipedia entry for presidio which was appropriate. I believe you're confused. s2grand
 * Yes, it was me messing up. I clicked on your talk link instead of User:68.32.24.14.  My bad.  Please accept my apologies.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  06:31, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey, why did you want to delete my Alydar offspring category? My information was correct. ~RacehorsesNCars —Preceding unsigned comment added by RacehorsesNCars (talk • contribs) 20:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Deletion guideline G7 says that "if the author blanks the page (outside user space), this can be taken as a deletion request." That's what I did.  Thanks for clarifying that you wanted the page kept; now I know that I was wrong to do that.  I've removed the tag.  Happy editing! RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  20:07, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mia Washington
An article that you have been involved in editing, Mia Washington, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ol Yeller '''Talktome 04:11, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reporting that guy haha. Ertemplin (talk) 21:44, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Flora Gomes
Hi RJaguar, I hope you don't mind, but I've removed the speedy tag from Flora Gomes as I take Director of prize winning film to be an assertion of importance.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  21:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. I see that there are also sources as well.  Good work.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  23:04, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

...
Do you have eyes, my friend?That page is not about Partizan Belgrade, but Partizani Tirana!I didn't vandalize anything...You have to correct that! —Preceding unsigned comment added by N.U.S.K.N.V.P. (talk • contribs) 20:13, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I know nothing about Eastern European football. If you have an issue, you can be bold and constructively change the article, or you can leave a comment with your issues on the talk page at Talk:KF Partizani Tirana.  Removing the whole content of the article to make a point doesn't help resolve the situation.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  20:17, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

OK, you don't know anything about Eastern European football (altought these clubs are from Balkans, which is in South-Eastern Europe, but never mind...), but can you read? There are written, that club is from Belgrade and topic is "KF Partizani Tirana".This is huge mistake and great shame for Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by N.U.S.K.N.V.P. (talk • contribs) 21:48, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Bearian
Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my page. Bearian (talk) 22:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

sorry–
Sorry for the vandalism,it wasn't me it was my little cousin.i leave him by the computer and he logs into my accounts and vandalizes,i explained to him not to vandalize so he won't anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kus1234 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Do you happen to know if your cousin just recently got blocked from Wikipedia for vandalizing the same articles? In any case, you haven't been blocked; just be careful not to leave your computer open.  I can't tell who's editing from any given account.  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  03:52, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

RGCSM
Just for your information, I have posted a prod at RGCSM. You have previously nominated a similar article for speedy deletion, although the deletion is not completed by an admin. Thank you for your kind attention.  Kayau  Jane Eyre  PRIDE AND PREJUDICE   les miserables  04:15, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Falafel
Please do not revert if you are unwilling to provide justification beyond a template. Good editors will provide a reason for a revert instead of resorting to the lazy use of a template. In the future, I advise you to put effort into your editing. --24.118.83.241 (talk) 05:47, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Last I checked, Bill O'Reilly has nothing to do with falafels. It was a completely unnecessary link.  Is there a good reason why he should be linked there?  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  05:48, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi!
This is to inform you that I held responsible for the file that I have uploaded entitled: Malayan Hmyn.png. Thanks and more power! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhakki18 (talk • contribs) 05:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 * So, that is to say you own the rights to the music and lyrics? Am I understanding you correctly?  RJaguar3 |  u  |  t  05:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

The writer of the song was written by the president of our college... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhakki18 (talk • contribs) 00:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * A couple of questions.
 * Who holds the copyright to the song?
 * Do you have permission to put the song in the public domain?
 * RJaguar3 | u  |  t  04:13, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

re:Comparison of collegiate quiz bowl formats
Bully! Great job!! I wonder if it is possible to extend this to high school, providing referencing is available. LonelyBeacon (talk) 23:15, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks...
...for the swift revert on my user page! Much appreciated :). ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ bomb 23:30, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

It's All Your Fault
The edit I made was undelibrate. I use Mozilla Firefox and the page "Editing It's All Your Fault" was selected by accident. I figured I could bring the page back, but my connection to the internet was terminated... And after I got it back I forgot to edit the page again. Sorry for all the details!! Why were the pages for "It's All Your Fault" and "Ave Mary A" deleted? Are they even deleted or the content was just replaced by "#redirct..."???Ahmedfarhat (talk) 20:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The content is still there and can be found at . It is a redirect to Funhouse (Pink album).  In the future, please be more careful.  Thanks for sharing that with me.  <font color="#D00000">RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 03:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Chris Nickson
I have nominated Chris Nickson, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Chris Nickson. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 03:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 16:19, 22 June 2010 (UTC)