User talk:RKleaderlikeyou

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 9)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:RKleaderlikeyou/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Whispering was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

 Whispering ( t ) 14:28, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:RKleaderlikeyou/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:RKleaderlikeyou/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. 14:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Hello, RKleaderlikeyou. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See WP:PAID. Thank you.Deb (talk) 15:03, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

Your rejected article
I notice you haven't commented on the advice I gave above about conflicts of interest. I just looked at the Tony Robbins article, which has been worked on by many different editors over a three-year period, and I would agree it's not very good. But I see major differences between this and your proposed article, not least of which is that Tony Robbins is clearly notable, whereas for your subject there is very little evidence of notability. You've fallen into many of the traps that self-promoters often do, such as including external links in the text. I'd suggest you look again at the policies and guidelines linked to Advertising, which should lead you to an understanding of where you have gone wrong. Deb (talk) 11:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)