User talk:RL0919/Archive 2013

Disambiguation link notification for January 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Larry J. Sechrest, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libertarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Non-free cereal box cover


A tag has been placed on Template:Non-free cereal box cover, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Redirected template, redirect has no meaningful incoming links

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Template:Non-free cereal box cover listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Non-free cereal box cover. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Non-free cereal box cover redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Nice article on Ayn Rand influences!
I was actually just thinking of writing this exact article, just the other day, no joke! Given Ayn Rand's philosophy, I was planning on titling it "List of Individuals influenced by Ayn Rand", but other than that, I had the exact same idea just a few days ago and was beginning to write it as I stumbled upon your article. Way to beat me to it! Nice work! It feels like one of those cosmic coincidences where one person beats the other to the patent office just a few days prior. Lenschulwitz (talk) 03:44, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, glad you liked it. There are still no dates or brief descriptions for most folks on the list (I only did non-living ones initially), so there is still plenty of opportunity to contribute. :-) --RL0919 (talk) 04:36, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, I most definitely will. There are a couple doozies the article is missing.  For one, Howard Roark himself (aka Steve Jobs). ;) Lenschulwitz (talk) 09:11, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Template:Empty section
Empty section is up for deletion at Templates for discussion/Log/2013 May 1; I thought you might want to know because you were responsible for closing the DRV on it in 2011. Nyttend (talk) 20:31, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Verna Hillie
Allen3 talk 00:04, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Night of January 16th, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbara Bedford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doris Nolan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Woods (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Decline Speedy Deletion?
Regarding these two articles: 1. 2.

The reason why I requested Speedy Deletion is because that both of the user's articles aren't in English. They appear to be in Spanish. Spanish Wikipedia has their own article on Regular Show here. 76.117.166.209 (talk) 10:53, 5 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Coherent non-English text is explicitly excluded from the "nonsense" speedy deletion criterion. These pages are user pages, not articles, so they cannot be speedy deleted as duplicates. If the user does nothing with them, I will nominate them for the appropriate deletion process. --RL0919 (talk) 14:07, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Tu ne cede malis

 * Just doing what I can. Thanks. --RL0919 (talk) 03:21, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Rothbard talk page
I have used two of your phrases in a Talk:Murray Rothbard comment. Please let me know if you'd like me to attribute them to you. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 01:46, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Now a moot point. More discussion followed, so I decided to be more explicit as to where I came up with the phrases. Thanks again. – S. Rich (talk) 02:10, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Creationism
Imagine you were editing evolution and ran into a fellow who asked you for a reliable source to back up some detail. You go ahead and give him a college biology textbook, and he tells you that the only truly reliable source in matters of biology is the Bible, which is literally true in all ways.

What do you do then? It's not like you can ever convince him of anything because he's not on the same page as you. You can talk until you're blue in the face, but you'll just get frustrated. He just doesn't understand biology and doesn't want to. Sure, he's got a strong opinion, but it's not worth a damn and there's no reason to listen to it. All you can do is shrug, like Atlas, and move on.

So when you told me you couldn't understand what "popular philosophy" meant in those sources, you were admitting that you don't have what it takes to understand the issues. You might as well have said you only accept the words of Ayn Rand as a reliable source, for all that it matters. And all I can do is shrug and move on. As far as I'm concerned, you're pretty much like that imaginary Bible-thumper: too biased and incompetent to contribute.

Now, I can't stop you from taking this as an insult, but it's really all about your demonstrated behavior and ability, so it's not personal at all. I don't hate you, I just don't think your opinion about Ayn Rand can be trusted, so I can't give it any weight at all. MilesMoney (talk) 06:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * I've been editing here for years and have earned the occasional thanks, and even some responsibility in the process. If you think not accepting your particular arguments in this case means I am am incompetent dogmatist, well, that's your opinion. It is insulting, attempts to disclaim insult notwithstanding. But I've gotten worse treatment than you are likely to descend to (although there's time for you to prove me wrong!), and I'm still chugging. It's too bad that you feel frustrated, but you should look elsewhere for the source of that. --RL0919 (talk) 07:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

The Fountainhead
Before I rv you, could you please point to some source for your assertion that it is "an urban legend"? More to the point, we presently have no explanation for the title (and having recently read the book I can confirm there is nothing in the text to explain it) and Rand's quotation would appear to be an adequate explanation. YOu have some alternative? --AlisonW (talk) 19:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * It is the addition of the content that needs to be sourced, not the omission of it (see WP:BURDEN). The origin of the legend appears to be from promotional materials for the novel -- I've found the wording in ads and cover blurbs, not any of Rand's own writings. Normally the publisher's publicity department writes that stuff, not the author, and in any case it would be written after the title was decided upon. When this quote was first added into the article, it was worded as, "The book's title may be interpreted as follows: 'Man's ego is the fountainhead of human progress.'" Another editor later changed the wording to say it was a quote from Rand. From there it spread over the web. Probably all innocent, but this is what happens when WP editors work without sources.


 * The origin of the title is accounted for by Jennifer Burns in her book about Rand, Goddess of the Market. On page 85, she says that Rand originally titled the novel Second Hand Lives, but her editor pointed out that this emphasized the villains rather than the heroes. Rand suggested The Mainspring as an alternative, but another novel had recently used that title. So they went to a thesaurus and found fountainhead as a synonym for mainspring. --RL0919 (talk) 19:23, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Comments on my talk page
Your comments on my talkpage regarding bleeding hearts libertarians (used in Ludwig von Mises Institute) are being invoked to justify what I believe is an improper group blog addition to the LvMI article. My contention is that BHL is SPS and cannot be used as it involves 3rd parties. I have tagged the LvMI article section & refs as SPS. Please comment. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 02:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

RSN notice
– – S. Rich (talk) 01:54, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Alexandru Buziuc and Valter Heil Deleted Pages
Hello!

I'm kindly asking you if it's possible to restore the deleted pages of Alexandru Buziuc and Valter Heil. I don't know what kind of problems the original creator has caused but the pages contained real information. Hope you can restore them, if not please notify me so I could re-create them.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ostasul (talk • contribs) 05:29, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * These were very brief articles with only basic information in them, and each had just one source in Romanian. So it is probably best for you to recreate them rather than me restoring content that I cannot properly verify. --RL0919 (talk) 09:20, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Declined speedy
I declined a speedy on Colin Ratushniak, which I see you declined as well. I'm tempted to give the user what she wants and nominate it for AfD so it can run through another deletion discussion, but I kind of think that'd be seen as a bad faith nomination. I'm just slightly worried about another admin deleting it without really looking at the article's history. I know we can all be a little trigger happy now and then. We can always un-delete it, but I'd prefer to work on stopping the deletion nominations now rather than let it get deleted first. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:07, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and AfD'd it. I'm a little puzzled why she suddenly went from creating and defending it pretty hard in the last AfD to wanting it deleted now, but I think that she'd otherwise keep nominating it for deletion. The article's deletion page is at Articles for deletion/Colin Ratushniak (2nd nomination), if you're interested in keeping tabs on it. I don't have any true opinion on it one way or another, but I figure that this will clear the air once and for all. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:23, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi
2:10 . . RL0919 (talk | contribs) changed visibility of 2 revisions on page Acharya S: content hidden ‎(RD2: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy)
 * I keep see this beeping on my watchlist, seems to be a very regular occurence and likely to increase given the 2012 book. Would you object to a RFC to revist this linking to the two Google Books but instructing participants in the RFC not to actually mention the first name until the RFC is finished done and closed? In ictu oculi (talk) 04:08, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
 * No objections from me. I don't particularly care about the name issue per se; I'm just trying to make sure WP:BLP is being observed. If the consensus is that there is no BLP problem anymore, then so be it. --RL0919 (talk) 12:09, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Sanctions on LvMI
With virtually unanimous approval, can you or another admin just wrap things up now? The biased editing and personal attacks are already intensifying on LvMI related threads, so admin scrutiny will likely be necessary in the near future. Steeletrap (talk) 17:41, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately I am very much WP:INVOLVED, both in the ANI discussion and in unrelated conflicts with some of the participants at the LvMI page. So I don't think it is appropriate that I close the discussion and log the sanction. It would almost certainly become a point of appeal when someone eventually gets blocked or placed under restrictions. But I do agree that it is ripe for closure. --RL0919 (talk) 17:48, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 by , Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted. New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis?? New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration Read the full newsletter ''Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 19:51, 27 October 2013 (UTC)''

Data granularity
Please see Template talk:Infobox book and don't make further such changes until the matter is resolved. Thank you. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 00:28, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 14:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Riggenbach
RL, do I read this correctly? "If you can connect him to multiple works from Category:Audiobooks by title or series...then I'm happy to reconsider." As I understand, if Riggenbach is listed as the narrator for books fitting into the category, such as the Manchester book I mentioned, then he qualifies. The category has print books that include audio versions (such as The Program (novel) & World War Z). And some of the listings are strictly audio (which would diminish their distribution). If listing Riggenbach as the narrator of major recorded books is the criteria needed for notability in this category, then that's the sort of gnomish editing I enjoy. Thanks. – S. Rich (talk) 19:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I was going on the assumption that the listings in the category were actually notable audiobooks, not notable print books that have an audio version. Looking at the category more closely, it seems that isn't the case. I will adjust my remarks accordingly.


 * The general idea here is that if a production is notable, then independent sources have discussed it. If a person is a major performer in multiple productions that are widely discussed, then probably their performances have been discussed. Hence they are probably notable. But if all the sources are actually about some other version of the work, then it doesn't have that impact. For example, if a high school drama club performs a famous play, that doesn't make the performers notable, because the production isn't notable.


 * So, in the specific case, if the audiobook version of a work is notable and he is a major performer for it, then that supports his notability. But if he performed in a non-notable audiobook of a famous print book, that doesn't help. --RL0919 (talk) 19:57, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Acharya S
Please don't revert me. Unless you want to spend thousands of hours in yet another protracted battle over this article, which I for one really want to avoid. I'm an admin and OTRS volunteer and please believe me when I say you don't want to know about this. Cheers, Guy (Help!) 23:19, 12 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Oh, dear, are you an admin? Well in that case ... you should discuss your content concerns on the article talk page like any other editor in a WP:BRD situation. Waving the mop around doesn't impress me, especially since I have one of my own. If you are acting on an OTRS ticket, then please say so explicitly. Otherwise your participation as a volunteer there is irrelevant as well. There won't be any "protracted battle" if you explain your edits like a normal person and have decent reasons to support them. Haughty declarations of status don't have any argumentative weight. --RL0919 (talk) 23:35, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

james chodewick
my teacher says his name is james chodewick so thts why i changed it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lilmonsta98 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Linda Taylor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!
Nikkimaria (talk) 20:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)