User talk:RM395/Course/Week 02/Group4

Topic
The vision of the Wikimedia Foundation (the organization behind Wikipedia) is "Imagine a world in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge.
 * What does this mission mean to you?
 * To what extent does Wikipedia meet or fall short of the goals implied in this statement?
 * Would you change anything about the Vision?

Just posting this here so we don't have to flip between tabs. --Katerwaul (talk) 16:46, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Ideas for how to go about this
Maybe have 1 header for each question and we each answer it and then try to find a way to collectively merge them all together? --MangoDango (talk) 16:45, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Maybe we can have one person per header answer the question (3 headers/people total) and one person edit it all, smoothing it out and combining the headers?--Tabbboooo (talk) 16:48, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

I will do the paragraph of how the vision falls short--SJRick (talk) 16:47, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Sounds good. I'll do the first one, then. --Katerwaul (talk) 16:48, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I'll edit them if you guys want. Just type done under the header/after the last word in your paragraph?--Tabbboooo (talk) 16:50, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, then I'll be doing the last one? --MangoDango (talk) 16:50, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Roger that. --Katerwaul (talk) 16:52, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Going to erase convo under response, FYI.--Tabbboooo (talk) 16:54, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I put in my section on the downfalls. We have to make sure to put them in order--SJRick (talk) 16:56, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Posted my crappy sentence already in the interest of time! --Katerwaul (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

"Would you change anything about the Vision?"
(Sorry I am having trouble with this, I am kind of stumped) ugh sorry there was an edit conflict and time ran out D: I would say that this vision is pretty good, especially the "free" part. Since there are times where some issues may not have a "perfect" right or wrong answer, wiki tries to handle by trying to show both sides in a neutral way, hence "sum of all knowledge." --MangoDango (talk) 16:58, 14 January 2013 (UTC)