User talk:RM395/Course/Week 02/Group5

We should use the talk page for discussion
 * Looks like we have main issues of accessibility and the limitation of format (i.e. language). Anything else?--Jeflicki (talk) 16:47, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Those are the only problems I can think of. Any ideas on if it should be changed? --Youngpenn (talk) 16:49, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * "Wikipedia is limited in the fact that it almost entire covers through written language" - not sure what you mean by this --MartellRedViper (talk) 16:49, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * It only uses words. Not too much in other forms of communication like video or sound. (Took the liberty of moving this.)--Jeflicki (talk) 16:52, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Would it not be better to say it  Wikipedia is limited in the fact that it is expressed in written language.--Youngpenn (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Group 4 Invasion
Any notes we make go here! --Katerwaul (talk) 16:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I am not exactly sure what this sentence is saying "Wikipedia is limited in the fact that it almost entire covers through written language" isn't this not a limitation since it covers a lot of languages? --MangoDango (talk) 17:00, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I reworded that one. What's being said is that there are concepts that can't be explained with text, and Wikipedia is almost entirely text. --Katerwaul (talk) 17:03, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm finding a citation for this bit: "only 34.3 % of the population does have internet access" --Katerwaul (talk) 17:04, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The grammar of that sentence could be reworded as well.--SJRick (talk) 17:06, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think that written language stunts Wikipedia because information has to be conveyed by some means.--SJRick (talk) 17:07, 14 January 2013 (UTC)