User talk:RNNmarketing

Hello RNNmarketing. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:RNNmarketing. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Melcous (talk) 13:27, 9 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * Thank you for your message. I am going to be completely honest and would require your input for any matters in the future.
 * I work as Marketing Manager at RNN Group and work to promote the college. However, I am not compensated for the edits I have made on wikipedia. I only wanted to update the wikipedia pages of the colleges with the recent Ofsted Update, the edits I have made do not eulogize the colleges but state the information as facts. The college received an update from Ofsted and I shared that, in fact I did not even edit the negative news about the college just in the paragraph above the one I added. No money is being made by anyone through this edit, it is simply describing the college status and its offerings. The Rotherham College page indicated that the Chief Executive is John Conolly while the actual chief is Jason Austin, so I did not see a problem in editing that.
 * Even with the points I have made, if you still think there is something that needs to change, please let me know I will edit or remove it.
 * Also, there is another educational institute under the group called University Centre Rotherham that does not have a wikipedia page. Please let me know if I can make that and if there are any guidelines for publishing the page.
 * Regards,
 * Shahid. 195.195.173.11 (talk) 14:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)