User talk:ROAJSAHSI

November 2019
Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Newton's law of universal gravitation—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 14:57, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Newton's law of universal gravitation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 15:11, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. – Gilliam (talk) 18:20, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Punjab plains
Hello ROAJSAHSI,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Punjab plains for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Centre Left Right ✉ 08:13, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 6.022×10^23
Hello, ROAJSAHSI

Welcome to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, 6.022×10^23, for deletion because it seems to be incoherent gibberish. If you want to practice editing-skills, please use the sandbox.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 16:13, 19 January 2020 (UTC)