User talk:RPGAdventurer

February 2020
Hello, I'm Jake12195. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jake (talk) 07:39, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''I've noticed that you have persistently edited The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past with the same edit despite being reverted by several different users. You have also been warned in the past regarding the same page. While your edits seem to have originally been in good faith, you should have realized they did not conform to Wikipedia's policies after being repeatedly reverted. Please note you are subject to blocking if you continue to edit this article, or any other, in an unconstructive manner.'' Jake (talk) 08:54, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Nohomersryan (talk) 18:15, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Your recent editing history at The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Uncle Dick (talk) 02:37, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. If this behavior continues, the next admin should consider an indefinite block. EdJohnston (talk) 02:50, 29 February 2020 (UTC)