User talk:RPGprogrammers

February 2020
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to IBM i. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 14:48, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Welcome
In addition to this standard welcome, I'd like to add special thanks for editing the IBM i page: there are just a few of us that edit pages like these. As you get started, no doubt people will revert most of your changes, but don't let it bother you, just keep learning how to do it better, always be nice (or they'll block you). Please feel free to contact me for help and encouragement. I hope sometime we can get articles created for the pillars of this community (right now I can only think of Soltis, Klement, Paris) but there ought to be a lot more. Happy editing! Jacona (talk) 13:42, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 14:49, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

I am providing proper information. Our team has done brainstorming and wrote about IBM i, I have been reading this section from very long time. Also, I want to tell you that the content I provided has been used in this article but someone (most probably you) removed our reference. I will better take care to discuss this with you in future editing. Thank you.