User talk:RPI2026F1/Archive 1

Draft:Great Fire of Troy
Have you thought of expanding the article using information from the Troy Irish Genealogical Society website (extracted from Troy's One Hundred Years 1789-1889) or the Troy Historical Marker or the New York Almanac?? Dan arndt (talk) 01:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I'm actually using all of these right now to expand the article. RPI2026F1 (talk) 01:10, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

A belated welcome!


Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, RPI2026F1! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:


 * Introductory tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Writing an article
 * Five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Community portal
 * Help pages
 * The Teahouse (newcomer help)
 * Main help desk

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Dan arndt (talk) 03:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Great Fire of Troy has been accepted
 Great Fire of Troy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Great_Fire_of_Troy help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Dan arndt (talk) 02:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you! I apologize if my tone was a little rude to you. RPI2026F1 (talk) 02:09, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Its fine - we all get a bit possessive about articles we create sometimes. Happy editing & if you ever need any help on a draft drop me a line and I'll swing by and check it out. Dan arndt (talk) 03:36, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks! My next goal might be to create some more articles from the List of RPI buildings page. RPI2026F1 (talk) 10:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Your Files for Upload request: Mousou Telepathy Volume 1 Cover
Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! I've looked over your request and left a comment. Please check the comment and respond at your request on the main Files for upload page (not here). Your request will stay there for seven days and then it will be archived. Regards,Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 10:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Your Files for Upload request: Mousou Telepathy Volume 1 Cover
Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! Unfortunately, your request has been declined. The reason is shown on the main Files for upload page. The request will be archived shortly; if you cannot find it on that page, it will probably be at this month's archive. Regards,- Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 16:20, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Saint Ambrose School (Latham, New York)
Hello, RPI2026F1, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username TheAafi, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Saint Ambrose School (Latham, New York), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Saint Ambrose School (Latham, New York).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

─ The Aafī   (talk)  17:08, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Browser Company (October 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RPSkokie was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Browser Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Browser_Company Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RPSkokie&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Browser_Company reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 13:16, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Browser Company (October 12)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Browser Company and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Browser_Company Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Browser_Company reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:24, 12 October 2022 (UTC)

The Ratio
Moved to Talk:The Ratio at 15:15, 13 October 2022 (UTC).

Query
Hello, RPI2026F1,

You have only been editing for a week. How did you learn about Twinkle and nominating articles for deletion at AFD? Did you edit here under other usernames? You don't act like a new editor at all. Since you are such a new editor, I wouldn't give advice to other editors on what to do, like you did on that IP's talk page. You are still learning yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 03:02, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

I spent the first few days tinkering around with the gadgets page. I figured out what Twinkle is by clicking each option and trying to guess it’s behavior from all the small question marks. RPI2026F1 (talk) 03:05, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Also, I noticed a lot of recent changes had twinkle on them as a tag so I figured it did a lot of useful things since it was everywhere. RPI2026F1 (talk) 03:06, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Exocentric storage moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Exocentric storage, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Hey man im josh Ok, why was my stub moved to draftspace, and not a similar article on Exocentric environment? At least my stub had references, the similar article has no references and when Googling it I found that basically every other site copied the unreferenced Wikipedia definition. RPI2026F1 (talk) 15:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Monster Mash
Do NOT post templates that do not apply to a user’s edits again or you will be reported. 2604:2D80:6A8D:E200:D14A:7B88:A9DA:A03D (talk) 12:48, 16 October 2022 (UTC)


 * It was a honest mistake. Calm down. RPI2026F1 (talk) 12:49, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Tagging pages for speedy deletion
Hello, RPI2026F1,

You are a very new editor and I don't think you have enough experience to be tagging pages for deletion right now. For example, CSD G1 is for Patent nonsense. Pages consisting purely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. So if a page have sentences with words and you can understand it, then it is not gibberish. Gibberish is for pages with "kewni3920kdn#(P" on them.

Deleting User pages or draft articles is a serious business. Doing so can cause a new editor to stop editing and leave the project. So, there must always be a good reason for a page deletion that makes the deletion necessary, it isn't a matter of just using Twinkle to tag pages that are poorly written or that don't look useful to you. That is why we have Criteria for Speedy Deletion which lay out the acceptable criteria for a page to be speedy deleted. They are specific and quite limited, on purpose. With pages that are not obviously vandalism, copyright violations, attack pages or advertising (and a key word here is "obviously"), then a Proposed deletion or a nomination at Articles for Deletion is more appropriate.

Also, we allow more leeway in Draft space. Pages that would be unacceptable in main space are fine in Draft or User space because they are the namespaces where editors can practice their editing and work on articles over time. There are few reasons that require pages in these namespaces to face swift deletion (they are the "G" reasons only, not "A" reasons). For example, drafts don't need to have references, they can be poorly written and they don't have to even be in English and that is okay. That's why I try to encourage editors that want to patrol, instead of, say, improve articles, to focus on the main space rather than Draft space. Readers will not encounter pages in Draft space so we don't have to worry about mistakes or errors like we do in main space.

If you are interested in patrolling, when you have more experience editing, you should consider volunteering for the New Pages Patrol since that seems to be your focus right now. But the Guild of Copy Editors also always needs help and that would involve fixing article typos and help improve your writing skills. We always need competent, enthusiastic editors, it's just important to take your time, learn the relevant policy and not go overboard. If you have questions about any of this, pleae bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 21:44, 18 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Alright, I have may gotten very overenthusiastic about the tagging of new pages. I figured out how to calibrate recent changes so it only showed me possible garbage pages, and so I was basically going through every item and nominating everything that wasn't an actual attempt at an article. I realized I need to cool down, so I might switch gears to focus more on updating references and fixing typos like earlier. RPI2026F1 (talk) 23:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Egocentric storage (October 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Egocentric storage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Egocentric_storage Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Egocentric_storage reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Exocentric storage (October 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Exocentric storage and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Exocentric_storage Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Exocentric_storage reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:03, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

October blitz bling

 * Oops I totally forgot I was in this thing lol. At least I did contribute to a single big article. RPI2026F1 (talk) 20:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Your DRN case is opened ! I, the DRN volunteer will take care of this case to come to a consensus quickly ! Craffael.09 (talk) 00:31, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Slavery in Afghanistan discussion
Hello! I do not have the energy to continue the discussion on Slavery in Afghanistan, since it appears we are going no were: the User Minahatithan do not appear to understand what the concept of being baised is, and is also rude, in my view. I do not have the energy to continue when I have already tried to explain this to them several times without success. I will leave it to you; but may I suggest, that it would perhaps be a good thing to prevent Minahatithan from editing further on this article. He/she simply does not seem to be able to understand what being biased is and continue to insist in their right to baised editing on the article. I´m afraid I have no further energy for it, but of course I still dont want the article to be subject to biased editing. Best gretings, --Aciram (talk) 19:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I think this requires an intervention from an uninvolved party. Maybe Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents would be a good place to start? RPI2026F1 (talk) 19:36, 22 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I will leave this to you, but I would not protest to such a thing. To be honest, this is now less about the specific issue (I hardly remember it by now). The main problem for me, is that this person whish to edit this article from a biased point of view; to protect the "honor" or reputation" of a certain ethnic group or country. They do not understand that this is an incorrect principle to begin with. This is their viewpoint, and they appear to assume that this viewpoint is shared by others, and thus they will meet oponents with the assumption that the oponent is also editing from a viewpoint of ethnic bias. This is the biggest problem for me, and because of this attitude, which is repeated in almost every post, I cant view the person as a suitable editor of the article. I think that the article should simply be left alone by them, since they do not appear to understand this issue. I would have asked for this person to be blocked from editing the article until further notice, because their argumentation on the discussion page of the article demonstrate that they have a biased view and persist in this attitude. That is what I would see as ideal. This can be seen by anyone simply reading the discussion page of the article, since they demonstrate this attitude in every post they make. I have little time to give this issue, disregarding the fact that I am also simply tired of trying to explain this to them, since I have done so several times without success. --Aciram (talk) 20:29, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * They have, I see, again posted talk about honor and dishonor and shame, which has no place at all when discussion why something should be in an article or not. This is a much bigger problem, as I see it, than the specific issue. It is truly tiring.--Aciram (talk) 20:35, 22 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, I am sorry to bother you again, but I am afraid the same user seem to have begun edit warring in the article again. In my view this user have such a strong bias to the subject of the article that they should simply be prevented from editing it. They have made very clear on the discussion page that they wish to edit the article from the viewpoint of honor, dishonor and the reputation of an ethnic group, and despite numerous explanations to them that this is bias, they simply do not seem to understand it. It seems they must be stopped from editing the article. --Aciram (talk) 15:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Well if they continue undoing edits then they're going to get banned again. They already were banned once on the same article so it'll probably be a whole month the second time. RPI2026F1 (talk) 15:22, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I understand. Then its time for that block now, because they have just done it again, it seems. It should be reverted, but I have not done so, in the thought that maybe its not my place.--Aciram (talk) 19:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I'll take care of it. RPI2026F1 (talk) 19:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Aciram his most recent edit just deduplicated sources, it looks totally harmless to me. RPI2026F1 (talk) 19:42, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I see. That´s fine then, if they didnt actually change anything. I am afraid I dont have much good faith in the user´s credibility due to their stated motivations on the discussion page. Thank you for being oservant.--Aciram (talk) 21:29, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I would be careful with comments like these. No offense, but if I was on the receiving end, I would read something like this and say "look at this, he's slandering me". RPI2026F1 (talk) 22:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Not a "he" in my case, but I understand, and you are correct. Perhaps it would be enough to just say that the discussion and statements made on the discussion page make me feel that I am not the right person to continue it. I do not feel I have the time, nor the patience, to continue it, given the argumentation, and perhaps it is then better to retire from it rather than for it to develop in to a long drawn out discussion. I do not have the energy necessary. That was the reason of my last statement on the article talk page, and I suppose it is a good thing to know yourself well enough for that. In short: I do not believe I have the time, the patience, the energy, or the motivation to continue this conflict. I have an assignment to finnish in my real life as well, so perhaps it is indeed best to just leave this matter, disagreable as it might be. The discussion is there for all to see, and that should be enough. --Aciram (talk) 00:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I understand and don't blame you. I honestly think a third party desperately needs to intervene. RPI2026F1 (talk) 01:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your understanding, and I agree with you completely. After a bit of rest I did post a comment in the Dispute resolution noticeboard. I felt I should at least explain myself, since it had already opened. I can´t promise to participate further, but perhaps that did some good. I have stated that there are facts in the article I wish to keep and that there are references for them, and linked more references. I don´t see that there are anything more I can do. --Aciram (talk) 20:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The same user have appeared again in the same article... Perhaps he should simply be blocked from editing the article because of bias? Are there a way to ask Wikipedia for this? That he is bias is stated more or less openly by him in the first discussion in the discussion page of the article: he openly states that he is Hazara, that he considers it dishonorable to mention that Hazara were enslaved, and questions everything about Hazara slavery in the article. The bias should be clear. Because of this, it should be fairly obvious and non-controversial to block him from the article for reasons of bias? It is so obvious that I should not even be in trouble for saying so. Perhaps this should be the best solution? It seems he is well capable of keep doing this for twenty years, and blocking him from editing this particular article out of bias should be a constructive solution. I have no patience or energy to keep arguing with him, and have said so openly on the discussion page. I am sorry for bothering you with this subject again, but since I sense I have no patience for it anymore, I thought I should at least dra attention to it to someone who might know something to do about it. My best regards --Aciram (talk) 15:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I am so tired and unwilling to think about this, please go to Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and report it there. Probably link his earlier ban and the DRN case. RPI2026F1 (talk) 15:12, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I understand, we feel the same way. I am tempted to just let the user do whatever they want because it is exhausting to deal with them, but it also feels wrong. I spend most of my time in wikipedia just writing articles, so I don't know much about reporting things, and how to go about it. Perhaps you can recomend a user who knows how to deal with biased users and how to block them? If the user was blocked from editing this article because of bias then the whole matter could be finnally just put to rest. But I understand if you don't want to have anything further to do with it. If you can recomend a user with knowledge about how these things work, please feel free to do so, otherwise I understand if you want nothing more to do with it. Best regards--Aciram (talk) 19:23, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello, I just wanted to let you know, that the user has now been blocked from edititing the article due to breaking the NPOW, after I did what you suggested. Thank you very much for the advice! Regards--Aciram (talk) 13:57, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Yea, that should hopefully be the end of the saga. There should never have been a reason to talk this much about such an obvious refusal to play by the rules. RPI2026F1 (talk) 14:02, 12 November 2022 (UTC)

Fred Trump
By your logic the burden of proof was on the original contributor to justify its inclusion in the article. Did that ever happen?

Furthermore, The citations aren't in dispute. What is in dispute is the need for a large physical appearance section on someone who lived in an era with photography--especially someone with many ready available photographs to veiw. Any subjective opinion published about his appearance where there are photographs in existence is completely unwarranted. If other contributors feel a physical appearance section is warranted, then it needs to adherence to an objective standard that supports a its necessity. It doesn't take much imagination to see how this would work. If the information cannot be observed via photograph and isn't hearsay, it is eligible for inclusion in the article.

In this particular instance, over two thirds of the article is dedicated to describing the appearance of a man whose picture is right next to the section. Short of his height, Childhood hair color, and a qualitative description of his hair color none of this thinly veiled propaganda has anything to with providing you information about his appearance.

For example,

and that it was said that "Fred would rise just a little on his toes" to look taller when taking pictures with Donald.

What on Earth does Fred Trump's insecurity about his son's height have to do with Fred Trump's physical appearance as such? The article already mentions he was 6 feet tall. If contributors feel his son's height is somehow relevant to Fred Trump's appearance (it's not) then it should either be stated objectively in this article without editorialization or the reader should use their own initiative to find out what Donald Trump's Height is by other means.

I could continue but I hope this sufficiency proves the point. And I don't think a compromise on including those features list above is out of line but this section, at least in it's current iteration needs to go. 66.76.193.27 (talk) 16:13, 17 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I'm saying it's stupid but there needs to be a good way to figure out what bits of information are worthwhile to move to some other part of the article and what should be deleted. RPI2026F1 (talk) 16:37, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I completely agree. What are your thoughts about the metric I mentioned in the previous post? 66.76.193.27 (talk) 18:20, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I can leave section there, keep the non subjective non extraneous (describing someone's jaw?) information about Fred Trump's physical appearance. 66.76.193.27 (talk) 18:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Someone merged the section with the personal life section but didn't actually delete any content. You should probably leave additional comments at Talk:Fred_Trump. RPI2026F1 (talk) 18:22, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

thank you ...
... for a constructive comment in the Laurence Olivier RfC, to which I referred in my arbccand questions. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:41, 30 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Man my account is 2 days too young to vote on the ArbCom elections, thanks for letting me know at least RPI2026F1 (talk) 13:27, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Mass revert at They Were Expendible
Yeo, User RPI2026F1, you need to not be so triggerhappy with your new edit/rollback privileges and carefully examine and evaluate edits before summarily reverting them. This not only is very bad form on your part, it serves to chase away the tender new users the encyclopedia depends on. As you once were, not so very long ago. How long would you have stayed being treated that way?

(Don't make me report you to RPI! (Insert humor icon here.)  If you are talented enough to get in there you have boatloads in reserve to employ actually assessing new edits rather than summarily reverting them.  Good luck from here on out.) 2601:196:181:BE00:E102:4EFB:8DC:D9D0 (talk) 17:36, 11 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Did you read the message I left for you on your talk page? RPI2026F1 (talk) 17:36, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes - but only after leaving this one here - and replying there. The perils of the same thread ending up split between two Talk pages.  Let's not let it induce any grief for us.
 * You are a student in computer science at one of the top scientific schools in the nation. Nobody, absolutely nobody, needs to have better command of language than a computer programmer - both spoken and written language, and machine language.
 * Everybody else, they can hem and haw, use a malaprop, homophone, or metonym, say "Er" and "Uh" all they want. Clear their throat to buy for time, and everyone, poets and playrights on up to Presidents and Popes gets a do-over most all the time. "What I meant to say is...."  Computer programmers, one false comma, one false letter, one unintended space, a program goes haywire.  There is no acceptable misuse of the language.  You'll be amazed how much better your English will be when you get your diploma in 2026.
 * Good luck getting up to that podium, and in using your degree to good effect ever-after.2601:196:181:BE00:E102:4EFB:8DC:D9D0 (talk)

hello,i have a question
you seem to be very defensive when asked about having other accounts,and i would like to ask, why? im not accusing you of anything,i am just wondering cheers!~ ItsMeKeys (talk) 19:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't like to be accused of something like sockpuppeting, because it's like claiming that someone "maybe plagiarized" on a college essay in that it has significant consequences if it turns out to be true. Also, I don't like having to keep on defending myself, and this is true even on social forums like Reddit or on chat platforms like Discord. RPI2026F1 (talk) 19:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * that does make a lot of sense,and i would most likely be frusterated as well if i was accused of sock puppeting.anyways,have a nice day(also,congrats on getting into that college, it takes a lot of work to get into collage.) cheers!~ ItsMeKeys (talk) 19:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. RPI2026F1 (talk) 19:20, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Sock tags
Your recent edits to sock tags were incorrect. Please leave tagging of sockpuppets to clerks, checkusers and admins. Thank you, Spicy (talk) 19:38, 13 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Oh, I thought all I had to do was look at the SPI case, see who the master is, and tag using the predefined links. RPI2026F1 (talk) 19:39, 13 December 2022 (UTC)

Rollback
Hi RPI2026F1. After reviewing your request, I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ARPI2026F1 enabled] rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! F ASTILY  21:19, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Anti-Vandal Barnstar for You.

 * Thanks! Huggle is so much faster for dealing with an onslaught of vandalism than Twinkle lol RPI2026F1 (talk) 02:24, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Hey RPI, not the IRS, but the RRS ( RemoveRedSky ) person coming back for a reply. You're welcome for the barnstar, and thanks for your recommendation of the service Huggle. I'm gonna have to try both Twinkle and Huggle out and see which one works best for me. / Best regards, RemoveRedSky / (u) (t) 02:27, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You need rollback for Huggle. RPI2026F1 (talk) 02:27, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, I didn't realize that. / Best regards, RemoveRedSky / (u) (t) 02:28, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Clan MacEwen
Dear Sir / Madam,

I take great exception to the table being removed from the Clan MacEwen wiki page. The external links were to the Clan's official website or to already established Wikipedia pages. The table took some considerable time to create and your action without prior discussion is most inconsiderate and profoundly inconvenient. I would be interested in learning which of the links you found to be inappropriate and why.

Kind Regards

Clan MacEwen AnDarach (talk) 15:13, 14 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Good morning. From the diff, I saw a heavy number of external links, and since Wikipedia doesn't use many external links except for sources, I thought that this might have been an attempted spam edit and reverted it. If you think I made a mistake, you can undo my revert. Thanks. RPI2026F1 (talk) 15:51, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Accrediting Commission of Career Colleges and Schools
Hello!

I am working with the director of ACCSC who wanted to more accurately represent the organization here on Wikipedia. I admit to being new to edits, so my apologies for not adequately justifying the changes. The claims on the current page are not representative of the organization and several citations/links are to opinion essays rather than accurate and fact-checked sources. What is the best course of action for making these changes with the necessary justification. 216.136.14.162 (talk) 18:36, 14 December 2022 (UTC)


 * If you are with the organization, that is a clear WP:COI. Ask further in the WP:TEAHOUSE please. RPI2026F1 (talk) 18:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I will do that. I appreciate your help. 216.136.14.162 (talk) 18:41, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

AFD participation
Hello, RPI2026F1,

If you wish to participate in article deletion discussion, please take them seriously. Don't just offer your first impression of an article, you need to carefully examine the sources present in the article and even look at resources available through Wikipedia or other website archives, like local newspaper sites, for additional sources that can be used to improve the article. Ground your article evaluation in Wikipedia policies. If you want your opinion to be taken seriously and not dismissed, you need to do your homework, not just give your opinion of the current state of an article.

Look through AFDs and see the level of participation and contribution given by more experienced editors and try to follow their example. Offering a comment like "Not notable" and nothing else, will cause discussion closers to not take you seriously as a discussion participant. If you think this is too time-consuming for you or requires more knowledge about Wikipedia policy than you currently have, then perhaps you should wait a while before diving into deletion discussions. Just something to consider. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 01:39, 16 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I thought it was determined by the number of votes, and I don't have the time to thoroughly review every single deletion article candidate when there's like 60 per day. How am I supposed to comment all of them if I have to spend more than a few minutes on each? RPI2026F1 (talk) 01:46, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cassina d'Agno (December 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cassina d'Agno and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cassina_d%27Agno Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Star_Mississippi&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cassina_d%27Agno reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star  Mississippi  16:57, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Preventing vandalism?
Greetings, RPI2026F1! I hope you are well. Considering our good and successful collaboration we had at the article Slavery in Afghanistan, I was wondering if you could perhaps give me an advice about the article Huda Sha'arawi. The User RETFrog has been removing a well referenced piece of information from the article. The incident were Huda Sha'arawi toor of her veil and was greeted by applause by women who followed her example is an iconic event in Egyptian feminism, and as you can see, it has several references. Despite this, the RETFrog have been targeting and removing it from the article. Their stated reason for doing so appears to be just a long speech that Egyptian women love the veil and that it is biased to claim otherwise. I have already warned the user. But I am a little afraid that this user are in danger of becoming just as difficult to deal with as the user at the article Slavery in Afghanistan. I do not want to deal with that again. Is there a way to nip this in the bud, so to speak? My best greetings, --Aciram (talk) 02:12, 17 December 2022 (UTC)


 * @Aciram First of all, have they broken the 3 revert rule already? You can report them if they have. RPI2026F1 (talk) 02:14, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Otherwise, you probably want to go through the dispute resolution board again. One can hope that this editor isn't as sporadic as the last one. RPI2026F1 (talk) 02:23, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Not yet. When they removed the information the first time, I reverted it, noticed it did indeed lack references, and added a bunch (its a famous event so references are not hard to find). When the user reverted the information again, with the same reasons given in bot the summary and at the talk page, I reverted it with even more references and warned them in the summary and at the talk page. Experience tell me this is a user that may revert a third time. They behave very similar to the earlier user. If they do, where should I report them? Preferably where I can avoid having to participate in endless discussions? --Aciram (talk) 02:26, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * There’s a notice board for 3 revert rule violations specifically. You can report them there. RPI2026F1 (talk) 02:32, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cassina d'Agno (December 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Blaze Wolf was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cassina d'Agno and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cassina_d%27Agno Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Blaze_Wolf&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Cassina_d%27Agno reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 17:39, 16 December 2022 (UTC)


 * @Blaze Wolf There are really no sources about it other than MapCarta/OpenStreetMap/etc, real estate websites, and local businesses in the area. I'm not sure from where I'm supposed to pull out sources that doesn't exist. RPI2026F1 (talk) 17:41, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If there aren't any sources then it might not be notable. ― Blaze WolfTalk<sub title="Discord Username" style="margin-left:-22q;">Blaze Wolf#6545 17:42, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * It's an area that exists, and there's a reference to it on the wiki page for Agno, Ticino. However, according to WP:GEOLAND, " Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low". Does that include even if no sources exist? RPI2026F1 (talk) 17:45, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Actually upon further investigation it seems to be more like a neighborhood more than it's own area. I assume neighborhoods are not allowed on Wikipedia? RPI2026F1 (talk) 17:47, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Neighborhoods may not be inherently notable and need sourcing that GEOLAND requires more. Please finish it before resubmitting. There is no rush. Star   Mississippi  18:02, 16 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Many neighborhoods have been so much the subjects of reports in Reliable Sources, that a WP article is easy. Examples include Greenwich Village and Mission District. Some have skimpy references and can support a paragraph in an article of broader scope. Thus far, this one seems to have none at all. It won't get anywhere without good citations. Jim.henderson (talk) 23:44, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * It's unfortunate because it's an unimportant place in a whole town of 4000 people in Switzerland. RPI2026F1 (talk) 00:56, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Worth discussing in the town and creating a redirect for anyone looking for the info? Star   Mississippi  02:29, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Probably. Mapcarta did not list the town it was part of otherwise I would have considered a redirect there. RPI2026F1 (talk) 03:07, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Why did you change my edit?
Why did you change my edit? 188.31.121.214 (talk) 19:18, 18 December 2022 (UTC)


 * This edit introduced a reference error, and so I thought it was vandalism since introducing the error was the only thing accomplished by the edit. RPI2026F1 (talk) 19:19, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Quis Afi discogwhatever
Your CSD tag for a history merge seemed at odds with your CSD on the misspelled article for A7. As Draft:Quis_Afi seems to pass A7, I just fixed the cut/paste.

…and of course as I was writing this the author moved that draft to article space. Cyrius|&#9998; 01:04, 21 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I looked at his edit history and noticed that he was trying to fix a typo, so I tag that first. Then I investigate a red link and see that his new article has 0 references plus the draft of the person the list article is about was rejected and also has 0 references, so I tagged that article next. RPI2026F1 (talk) 01:36, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Grey literature
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Grey literature, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.

120.21.174.47 (talk) 22:37, 25 December 2022 (UTC)


 * @120.21.174.47 can you explain how it's relevant in any way to the content of the article? RPI2026F1 (talk) 22:39, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You do not need to label each alternate spelling with a link to spelling differences, that's redundant. RPI2026F1 (talk) 22:40, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * So you didn't think it vandalism, but you treated it as such. Read WP:ROLLBACK — you must not use such tools for disagreements in content.  You're at risk of an ANI request for your permission to be removed.  120.21.174.47 (talk) 22:44, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * It initially seemed like vandalism to me. Once I saw your message on the talk page, I decided to investigate the edit further and arrived at the conclusion above. RPI2026F1 (talk) 22:46, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Adikako. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:54, 25 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Oh man ANI-hungry IPs absolutely are not fun to deal with RPI2026F1 (talk) 00:01, 26 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Claims to be a newcomer; "don't BITE". Right. Adakiko (talk) 00:44, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, RPI2026F1!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! RPI2026F1, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Abishe (talk) 11:55, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 11:55, 1 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much! RPI2026F1 (talk) 12:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

FIS Ski Flying World Cup
Hello, you have reverted my edits to the page, "FIS Ski Flying World Cup" as I have removed a lot without justification. The article I removed was completely outdated and overloaded, I have updated the article with today's edits, I ask you to restore them... Marius70 (talk) 15:59, 5 January 2023 (UTC)


 * @ Marius70 If you think my edits were in error, you are welcome to revert the edit (click the undo button to do so) but also include an edit summary explaining why my edit was a mistake. RPI2026F1 (talk) 16:01, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Cle Shaheed Sloan
Hi, it's my first time editing something on wikipedia and i don't understand why my edit was removed. Cle Shaheed Sloan. I provided a reuters article which detailed how he pleaded no contest to the charges, thus making "allegedly" misleading as he has been proven guilty. What should i do to get the change approved? Thanks. Icehax (talk) 01:53, 9 January 2023 (UTC)


 * @Icehax Sorry, I only saw the second edit and saw that the source alongside that edit said he pleaded guilty. If you think my edits were in error, you are welcome to revert the edit (click the undo button to do so) but also include an edit summary explaining why my edit was a mistake. RPI2026F1 (talk) 02:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

TheCrimsonnova
Hello, RPI2026F1. I'm TheCrimsonnova. I am sorry that you did not find my correction 'constructive'. And I understand that you tried to correct me because I am new to Wikipedia editing. Yet, thank you for the message and if you do ever stumble upon my editing, and if you do find it wrong, feel no guilt editing it, as I do like to learn! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.189.174.139 (talk) 13:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia! Your intentions were good but unfortunately that kind of commentary is not really appropriate. RPI2026F1 (talk) 14:10, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Terena (São Pedro)
Hello, RPI2026F1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Terena (São Pedro), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Terena (São Pedro)


Hello, RPI2026F1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Terena".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 00:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Egocentric storage


Hello, RPI2026F1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Egocentric storage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  23:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Exocentric storage


Hello, RPI2026F1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Exocentric storage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  23:37, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cassina d'Agno
Hello, RPI2026F1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cassina d'Agno, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cassina d'Agno


Hello, RPI2026F1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cassina d'Agno".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 17:44, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Browser Company
Hello, RPI2026F1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Browser Company, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

July 19 WikiWednesday + New York Botanical Garden Edit-a-thon (July 29)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2023 New York City truck chase
Hello, RPI2026F1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2023 New York City truck chase, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2023 New York City truck chase


Hello, RPI2026F1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2023 New York City truck chase".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 21:58, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

WikiWednesday (Aug 23) and Governors Island Wiki-Picnic (Sun Aug 27)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Sunday: NYC Wiki-Picnic @ Gov Island
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Sep 20: Wikimedia NYC Annual Election Meeting
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Sun Oct 1: NYC Hispanic/Latinx Heritage Month 2023
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:59, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Wiki.NYC Pavilion for Open House New York (Oct 21–22) and Wikidata Day (Oct 29)
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:02, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

James Schneider-political figure
I see that your edit of James was removed regarding early life second home information this did not exist and wonder if tge new version is from a reliable source what is the correct info? 2001:2020:341:F105:5465:CBD3:4C8:21DE (talk) 11:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Nov 15: WikiWednesday Salon + Wikimedia NYC Executive Director job
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:23, 10 November 2023 (UTC)