User talk:RR 2014

Re:
Damn good advice, RR 2014. I'll forego the ever present you're editing too adroitly to be new user drivel to say if you're returning, please be more careful. If you're someone I've blocked or declined an unblock request for, please understand that it was nothing personal. Regards  Tide  rolls  07:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Regarding this IP, I saw Helen's post at the noticeboard when I was posting myself on a number of editors intent on "naming and shaming" so-called "right to be forgotten" applicants. I know her work at the Pistorius trial page and went on the Talk page there to support her. I think she does a good job and is worth supporting. As for the IP, he (she) is plainly misguided about the nature of the project and has worked himself up into a bit of a tizzy. I was just offering him some kindly advice.


 * I propose to write up Lindqvist in the next few weeks and in general continue editing in this rather specialized niche of EU law. I can't really spare more time. I wish I could. At some point in the future I might contribute some fairly technical edits on the subject of tax avoidance. RR 2014 (talk) 17:57, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

I now have some time to work on Lindqvist, but I want reassurance in the first place that I will not be further harassed by you, possibly having my edits reverted or my account blocked, because you feel I am editing too "adroitly". In the first place I have put a message to this effect on your talk page and I await your response. RR 2014 (talk) 11:33, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * No harassment took place so "further" harassment will not be forthcoming. I can only assure you that as long as your edits conform to the policies and guidelines of this project, they stand a good chance of standing without revision.  That being said, every individual that clicks the "Save page" button is subjecting their content to review and reversion.  Regards.  Tide  rolls  12:23, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
 * That is not the reassurance I sought. I shall continue to edit at Costeja and to remind Wikipedia editors of their community's BLP policy when it comes to the naming of non-notable individuals presumed to have made "right to be forgotten" applications, but I am not, in the circumstances, prepared to give otherwise more of my time. RR 2014 (talk) 21:23, 25 August 2014 (UTC)