User talk:RRoyce624

October 2014
Hello, I'm SummerPhD. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sum mer PhD (talk) 14:15, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Wharton reverts
Please be aware of WP:3RR and engage the community in discussion on the article's talk page as needed. —Eustress 14:33, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014
Your recent editing history at Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 21:13, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 22:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, you can verify that the edits do not violate the 3 reversion rule, as several of them (including 628259566|21:53, 4 October 2014) are not reversions at all, but addition of new content taking into account suggestions. This focused on the research contributions of professors, and added new citations. Also, there is active participation on the article's talk page, which can also be verified. Thanks

October 2014
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Acroterion   (talk)   23:27, 4 October 2014 (UTC)