User talk:RRwater

August 2014
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Tommy Wiseau does not have an edit summary. In the mean time, I have (again?) undone your edit to because it seems an incorrect editorial judgement.

The edit summary appears in:
 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list and
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! DMacks (talk) 18:22, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Reverting other editors
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Tommy Wiseau. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.--McGeddon (talk) 18:44, 25 August 2014 (UTC)