User talk:RSWitwer

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, RSWitwer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Resistant starch. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

July 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Resistant starch. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 12:32, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Conflicts of interest
Please be aware that Wikipedia has guidelines covering people with a conflict of interest: WP:COI. In light of these, please could you clarify what real-world connection you have to Resistant Starch? Note that editors with a COI are strongly discouraged from editing conflcited topics. Alexbrn (talk) 08:26, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I have no conflict of interest regarding resistant starch. I make no money off of this topic and do not work for any of the resistant starch manufacturers currently. I have been studying this topic for more than a decade and am an expert on the topic.--98.221.246.29 (talk) 10:53, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * A less than fulsome response (though of course you have no obligation to answer). You would not need to work for a "manufacturer" of RS to have a CoI. Working professionally with RS or the RS industry (especially in an advocacy or marketing role) would also of course count, for example. Your edits have a high degree of WP:ADVOCACY for supposed health benefits or RS which appears to be at odds with the scientific literature. Alexbrn (talk) 12:32, 26 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi RSWitwer. I work on conflict of interest issues, as well as articles about health.  I hear you, that you currently have no financial relationships with any companies that market resistant starch, and that you are familiar with that product from your past work. We can only take that on good faith.   Please do be aware that in Wikipedia, COI is subset of the larger issue of advocacy - people come to Wikipedia to contribute for many reasons - sometimes financial, sometimes passion for a topic.  That passion can be a double-edged sword - it drives people to contribute (which is great) but also can lead to editing that violates our neutral point of view policy.   Please do read the essay, WP:ADVOCACY which lays that out some.
 * Also, please do read our helpful essay, WP:EXPERT - it affirms that we greatly value experts here, but it also warns experts that Wikipedia is a different publishing medium - we have policies and guidelines that govern content, writing style, and behavior. There is learning curve.  I have a little essay that explains how this place works, that I can paste here, if you would like.  But most relevant to the Resistant starch article, please do read WP:MEDRS, which governs sourcing for content about health in Wikipedia.
 * Finally, should you take on a client who wants a Wikipedia article written or edited, please know what we will look to you disclose that relationship at the article Talk page where you are working and ideally on your user page as well. Please note that having a conflict of interest is not the end of the world in Wikipedia - we just ask you to disclose the COI and work through a form of peer review, which I will be happy to explain, once it becomes relevant. (or now, if you like).  Best regards Jytdog (talk) 20:20, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Resistant starch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RDI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Resistant starch. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 18:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)