User talk:RSzzzz

July 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Dilnawaz Qamar has been reverted. Your edit here to Dilnawaz Qamar was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/dilnawaz.qamar, https://www.facebook.com/Silver-Lining-267771056913777/?fref=ts) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:04, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dilnawaz Qamar


The article Dilnawaz Qamar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 01:03, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Salaam Namaste has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:38, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Salaam Namaste was changed by RSzzzz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951516 on 2016-08-31T16:38:05+00:00.

Speedy deletion nomination of Dilnawaz Qamar


A tag has been placed on Dilnawaz Qamar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Paste Let’s have a chat. 11:50, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dilnawaz Qamar


A tag has been placed on Dilnawaz Qamar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. red dogsix (talk) 19:15, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Information orange.svg Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Dilnawaz Qamar, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Finngall  talk  22:38, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Dilnawaz Qamar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dilnawaz Qamar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dilnawaz Qamar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. red dogsix (talk) 22:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Dilnawaz Qamar
Please stop adding copyrighted images to Wikipedia. If you have permission, please see WP:DCM. red dogsix (talk) 23:16, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sasural Genda Phool have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:40, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Raja Shahrukh


A tag has been placed on Raja Shahrukh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Raja Shahrukh


A tag has been placed on Raja Shahrukh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. SorryNotSorry ✽ ✉  11:27, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

porposed deletion of Sheena bajj
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Sheena bajj. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! The garmine  (talk)  21:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

reference tags
RSzzzz-do you know how to use the reference tags? The garmine  (talk)  21:56, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Page moves
Please could you make sure you are completely happy with the location you are moving a page to before you do it? Both in spelling and namespace. I have cleaned up all the redirects you created this time around but yeah, please be more careful next time :) —Frosty ☃ 22:28, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop doing incorrect page moves. --Neil N  <i style="color:blue">talk to me</i> 13:25, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Raja Shahrukh


A tag has been placed on Raja Shahrukh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. <span style="text-shadow: 0 0 5px #2f9bf9, 0 0 15px #2f9bf9;color:#004b91">SorryNotSorry ✽ <span style="text-shadow: 0 0 5px #2f9bf9, 0 0 15px #2f9bf9;color:#004b91">✉  14:56, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Raja Shahrukh.jpg


The file File:Raja Shahrukh.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * orphaned file with no clear usability on project

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:30, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sujata Tyagi


A tag has been placed on Sujata Tyagi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Connorcp (talk) 14:51, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Splat
Hi there, I'm not sure how in this edit you interpret Rotten Tomatoes' splat as "mostly positive", but there is no critical consensus up for that film yet, so we should probably wait for that to materialise first before summarising. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:22, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Untitled Imtiaz Ali film, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs:  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:07, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. You have persistently added unsourced content, like here where you appear to be guessing what an untitled film's name is going to be, or here where you appear to be turning an unfavorable summary of commercial response into a more positive light, or here, where despite three references that give us a reasonable range for a film's budget, you fabricate a totally different number out of thin air. Those edits, plus earlier ones like this where you somehow interpret a Rotten Tomatoes splat as "mostly positive" make me think that you are not here to be constructive. So if you wish to be unblocked, you will need to convince a reviewing administrator that you are here to build an encyclopedia, not to change one to your personal worldview. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:58, 4 August 2019 (UTC)