User talk:RWJP

Welcome to my talk page. Please add new topics to the bottom of the page.

Welcome
Hello, RWJP, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Shadowjams Happy editing! Shadowjams (talk) 10:13, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Page blanking
Hi RWJP!

Regarding your summary "Undid revision 332829854 by Youngwinston (talk) Blanking the page isn't going to help. Please leave the page complete", blanking the page is considered a request from the author of the page to delete it. If you come across this in the future, instead of reverting, simply place the db-blanked template on the page. Regards, decltype (talk) 13:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Heo Yeong-man
Hello RWJP, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Heo Yeong-man - a page you tagged - because: '''The article linked does rather imply he's quite important, from the patchy translation I've used; enough for A7. Take to AfD (PROD would be contested judging by talk page discussion).''' If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Ged UK  17:24, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Recent edits to WikiProject:Airsoft
What I have done based on meta.wiki. — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 09:38, 8 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I am not a random editor. — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 09:39, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

SA80
I'm a little confused by your edit summary. Why should the heading be 'L85 Rifle' when the entire section solely talks about the improved A2 model? Hayden120 (talk) 14:01, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, i'm aware the section only talks about the L85A2, however, the rest of the information is covered in other parts of the article. Within the variants list, each of the weapon variants are described by their basic designation (Eg: L86 and L22) and then by the weapon type (Eg: LSW and Carbine). It makes sense then that the name of the section regarding the rifle variant of the L85 series should be "L85 Rifle" when the other sections follow that same pattern. Reading through it though, the section in question isn't quite as clear as it should be, and should, discuss the rifle variant as a whole, not the A2 variant specifically.


 * To simplify, I don't see why changing it to L85A2 is necessary when it doesn't fit with the way the rest of the Variant Headers are written. RWJP (talk) 22:25, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:51, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

The deletion of the flags at the AR-15 article
RWJP If you have a chance go back to User talk:ROG5728 and read the comments after yours. The person is playing a very old game on WP that has caused a lot of hurt feelings and drove off some good editors. But technically he is right. Also, you will discover something: By his standards there are no armies using the AR-15. So no matter the citation you give (ie with the exception of the US Army Special Ops and USAF Air Commandos) no nation ever used the AR-15) by the letter -- ie not the spirit -- of proof he is right. Finally, you tried to handle it well.  But you wasted your time, like I did, till I figured it out. JACK--Jackehammond (talk) 05:19, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikiproject Airsoft
Hello! I'm trying to revive this wikiproject by contacting a bunch of the participants that seem at least a little active. One of the beginning priorities was to increase the status of Airsoft or Airsoft gun to a featured article. It would be great to do this as airsoft is something becoming more prominent. The only real problem with the Airsoft article is the fact that it cites practically no sources... . If you're interested you can get me on my talk page or right here. Thanks, -- TheFSAviator &bull; T 01:45, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Airsoft Guns
Hey, I was wondering if you still wanted to revise the Airsoft Guns page? I could do it, but I require other's opinons on how to do it.Halofanatic333 (talk) 12:39, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Do you mean the category? Could you specify exactly what page? TheFSAviator ( T &bull; C ) 18:51, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * ? Got to the talk page, RWJP and I were talking about it a while ago.  A whole lot of wrong is on that page.  Halofanatic333 (talk) 01:57, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)