User talk:R desanc

Your submission at AfC 1946 Montreal Cotton Strike was accepted
 1946 Montreal Cotton Strike, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 07:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry Davis (gangster) has been accepted
 Harry Davis (gangster), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:23, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:R_desanc help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry Davis (September 28)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harry Davis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:R_desanc Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cutest_Penguin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:R_desanc reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

&#8212;  C ute st Penguin Hangout 05:29, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Work on Harry Davis (gangster)
Hello, overall good job on that piece, but a few points:

Here is that happens when you indent, and the whole paragraph will run one single line way off the screen
 * Do not indent the starts of paragraphs, it causes miscodings that make a weird box around the text
 * You're exactly opposite of when you should and shouldn't use spaces around footnotes. The "ref" coding should go right next to the words before it, no excess spaces between "ref" and "/ref" (just normal spaces), and then leave a space after the "/ref" ending. You're doing the exact opposite, an unnecessary space before starting the footnote and none at the end where you need it. Just look at how people do it in all the other articles on WP.
 * When you're citing the same work multiple times, use the WP:REFNAME coding to condense footnotes down together for neatness
 * At one point you had both Draft:Harry Davis and Draft:Harry Davis (gangster); do not ever have multiple drafts on different pages, that's very confusing for reviewers. If you need a draft moved somewhere, either use the [[WP:Move tool or ask a more experienced editor. Never do a cut-paste move of a whole page, as it separates the text from its version history.
 * Don't forget to add WP:Wikilinks to other articles, I added a bunch for you. But do not bold other names, simply bold the title term the first time it appears, there should be practically no bolding in the rest of the article.

Great work so far, we could really use an article on the Caron Inquiry if you're going to continue doing Montreal history (which is great, it's fun to have a specialty). Just bear in mind the above formatting stuff to save everyone time. If you ever have questions on format, take a glance at WP:Manual of style to get ideas on the rules. Thanks for your great article! MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:48, 28 September 2014 (UTC)